Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Accurate Are The Antibody Tests?


angie315

Recommended Posts

angie315 Apprentice

I have just found out today that my 4-year-old daughter has test positive for Celiac (the antibody blood test). I was wondering how accurate these tests are. We are trying to get in with the only pediatric gastro. dr in are area and they say it could be months before we can get in for a biopsy. Of course they are asking me to keeping her on a gluten diet until after the biopsy. Is there a percentage of false positives with this test? She doesnt have alot of signs of celiac. The reason she got the test was because she just turned 4 and weighed in at 28lbs. It makes me mad that they waited till now to test her. I have expressed worry about her weight since she turned one.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

tests aren't accurate in young children, which is probably (hopefully) one of the reasons they waited. additionally, false positives are pretty much unheard of, outside of the lab returning you someone else's results. her being underweight IS a symptom, but many people - particularly children - show few of the major symptoms like diahrea or significant intestinal distress. you can talk to the doctor about forgoing the biopsy and diagnosing based on blood tests alone, or just wait for the biopsy, but he's right in keeping her on gluten for that in order for it to be a reliable test.

thepeach80 Rookie

I would call and ask them why they need a biopsy and will they diagnose w/out that. Then ask what an 'official' diagnosis will do for you. Ask if the + results and her gaining weight on a gluten free diet will count instead? When my son was having reflux issues it took us 2.5mos to get into the GI and then if it weren't for our nurse, it would've taken us another 3 mos to get in somewhere else for a second opinion. We tested Evan (he's 26# at 3 and 34.5") and his was negative which is more common this age, than a +, especially since he's only eaten gluten for about 1/2 his life. I got tested today and don't plan on getting the biopsy if it's +. I hope the diet helps and I would start it ASAP.

jenilee Newbie
I have just found out today that my 4-year-old daughter has test positive for Celiac (the antibody blood test). I was wondering how accurate these tests are. We are trying to get in with the only pediatric gastro. dr in are area and they say it could be months before we can get in for a biopsy. Of course they are asking me to keeping her on a gluten diet until after the biopsy. Is there a percentage of false positives with this test? She doesnt have alot of signs of celiac. The reason she got the test was because she just turned 4 and weighed in at 28lbs. It makes me mad that they waited till now to test her. I have expressed worry about her weight since she turned one.

I've gotten mixed opinions on accuracy of this test. My 3 1/2yo is only 29.5lbs and is a boy! he's like in the 8th % for his weight. No concerns from our ped though.

thepeach80 Rookie
I've gotten mixed opinions on accuracy of this test. My 3 1/2yo is only 29.5lbs and is a boy! he's like in the 8th % for his weight. No concerns from our ped though.

Weight is so tricky! For us Evan just doesn't fit w/ our family size wise, lol. Sounds terrible doesn't it and I know there's always recessive genes etc, but no one is small in our families. It won't be long before Evan and his sister (2 yrs younger) look like twins, they're only about 4# difference. Evan has obvious bouts where he grew, when he was Neocate only he took off in weight and height and when we introed foods back, he slowed down so it's hard. Right now we're o.k. w/ his 5% weight, it's his height that worries us sometimes (0%).

Juliet Newbie

Angie -

I just found this on the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University website:

"Causes of false positive celiac serologic tests

The endomysial antibody test is virtually 100% specific for celiac disease. However anti-tTG has been reported to be positive in the presence of liver disease, especially cirrhosis [33], diabetes [34, 35] and severe heart failure [36], as well as arthritis [37] and various autoimmune disorders [38]. The use of human tTG as the antigen in the test kit adds some greater specificity. Antigliadin antibodies may be present in inflammatory bowel disease [39], collagen vascular disease [40], and in many healthy people as well [41].

Positive serologic tests in the presence of a normal biopsy

This situation occasionally arises. The presence of a positive EMA with a normal biopsy indicates either the presence of celiac disease that was not detected in the biopsy, either because of too few pieces being taken or misinterpretation. The biopsy should be reviewed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. If it is considered to be truly a normal biopsy the patient may well have latent celiac disease and will probably develop the disease at a later date."

I would think that unless there is a problem with cirrhosis, diabetes, etc., you could take that positive blood test as a positive diagnosis for Celiac Disease. And you can test for these other problems, too, and then if all are negative, it leaves only one possibility.

Like someone else suggested, find out if this g.i. doctor would diagnose without doing the biopsy with a combination of positive blood test and (if you try it) positive response to the diet. You could also get a gene test to see if your child has the gene for it. If your doctor and/or insurance won't do it, you can get one done through enterolab.com. Some of their other tests available are not yet recognized by the general medical community, but their gene test is reliable in the sense that if your child has HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8, then your child has one of the Celiac Disease genes. The other gluten intolerant genes that they recognized are not yet also recognized as so by the medical community (and I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with their position - I need to research more myself before having an opinion). Some g.i. doctors will take the positive blood test with a positive gene test as enough for a diagnosis.

And (please keep in mind, this is only my two cents and I hope I'm not offending anyone) I would get your child onto a gluten free diet as soon as you can. Every day someone with Celiac Disease is exposed to gluten they are being damaged. This can lead to several other complications besides low weight: other autoimmune diseases, low bone density, liver problems, increased risk of cancer, etc. And some of the emotional/behavioral/mental issues that others experience (and your child may be experiencing as well and you just don't know about because this has been your "normal" for so long) can be very scary. Waiting that long just to get a positive biopsy (and as you can see from the quote above, it does happen) just seems to me a little scary.

angie315 Apprentice
Angie -

I just found this on the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University website:

"Causes of false positive celiac serologic tests

The endomysial antibody test is virtually 100% specific for celiac disease. However anti-tTG has been reported to be positive in the presence of liver disease, especially cirrhosis [33], diabetes [34, 35] and severe heart failure [36], as well as arthritis [37] and various autoimmune disorders [38]. The use of human tTG as the antigen in the test kit adds some greater specificity. Antigliadin antibodies may be present in inflammatory bowel disease [39], collagen vascular disease [40], and in many healthy people as well [41].

Positive serologic tests in the presence of a normal biopsy

This situation occasionally arises. The presence of a positive EMA with a normal biopsy indicates either the presence of celiac disease that was not detected in the biopsy, either because of too few pieces being taken or misinterpretation. The biopsy should be reviewed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. If it is considered to be truly a normal biopsy the patient may well have latent celiac disease and will probably develop the disease at a later date."

I would think that unless there is a problem with cirrhosis, diabetes, etc., you could take that positive blood test as a positive diagnosis for Celiac Disease. And you can test for these other problems, too, and then if all are negative, it leaves only one possibility.

Like someone else suggested, find out if this g.i. doctor would diagnose without doing the biopsy with a combination of positive blood test and (if you try it) positive response to the diet. You could also get a gene test to see if your child has the gene for it. If your doctor and/or insurance won't do it, you can get one done through enterolab.com. Some of their other tests available are not yet recognized by the general medical community, but their gene test is reliable in the sense that if your child has HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8, then your child has one of the Celiac Disease genes. The other gluten intolerant genes that they recognized are not yet also recognized as so by the medical community (and I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with their position - I need to research more myself before having an opinion). Some g.i. doctors will take the positive blood test with a positive gene test as enough for a diagnosis.

And (please keep in mind, this is only my two cents and I hope I'm not offending anyone) I would get your child onto a gluten free diet as soon as you can. Every day someone with Celiac Disease is exposed to gluten they are being damaged. This can lead to several other complications besides low weight: other autoimmune diseases, low bone density, liver problems, increased risk of cancer, etc. And some of the emotional/behavioral/mental issues that others experience (and your child may be experiencing as well and you just don't know about because this has been your "normal" for so long) can be very scary. Waiting that long just to get a positive biopsy (and as you can see from the quote above, it does happen) just seems to me a little scary.

Juliet-

Thanks so much for the attachment. I finally got an appointment with the GI ped. doctor on March 13th but they do have us on a cancellation list to get in sooner. They seem to understand that there is some urgency. My pediatrician has also expressed an urgency on getting her gluten free soon. I am having a very hard time continuing to feed my daughter gluten...I now feel like I am poisoning her. My husband has a lot of signs of Celiac Disease himself. I am sending him in for a blood test to see if that comes out positive. I will defintely speak to the doctor about skipping the biopsy if that test comes positive and about the gene test. Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mom with gf toddler Newbie

Hi,

just reading some of this........its been months since I was on this website. My now 3 year old had the biopsy and it was not bad at all. I am glad we did that because this gluten free diet can be hard at times and I have confirmation with the biopsy and will just keep moving forward gluten free. Also, my husband tested positive....good luck at your appointment.

thepeach80 Rookie

Has your DR called the GI to get your dd in? I know I was going to have to wait 3 mos for a 2nd opinion on Evan, but when our nurse called and explained what was going on, we got in the next week.

  • 2 weeks later...
angie315 Apprentice
Has your DR called the GI to get your dd in? I know I was going to have to wait 3 mos for a 2nd opinion on Evan, but when our nurse called and explained what was going on, we got in the next week.

We are in for March 13th but on a cancellation list. I am going to call again tommorow to see if she has any openings. We are trying different gluten free foods sporadically. We are still not gluten free but I thought it was a way of finding out what she likes so we can be ready. She is SOOO picky. She has not liked anything we have introduced! Ugh.

EmmaQ Rookie
We are in for March 13th but on a cancellation list. I am going to call again tommorow to see if she has any openings. We are trying different gluten free foods sporadically. We are still not gluten free but I thought it was a way of finding out what she likes so we can be ready. She is SOOO picky. She has not liked anything we have introduced! Ugh.

Definitely stay glutened up a lot. Children heal so quickly that any slack could result in less villi atrophy and then a negative biopsy.

Have you considered driving to a different Pedi GI that can get you in more quickly? We drove to Baltimore to Dr. Fasano. I would not say he is the best though, the number of biopsy samples taken was too little, they only took 4, I understand they should have taken at mininum twice that amount.

That is aweful to have to wait that long. I would be on the phone trying every angle I could, even going out of state.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.