Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Testing


cdog7

Recommended Posts

cdog7 Contributor

I'm so fed up with the whole idea of how celiac is diagnosed (especially after going through 3 doctors that had no clue about it), so now I'm considering the Enterolab test. I can't stand that I would otherwise have to damage my body on purpose, maybe for years just to get a dx, even when I have all the symptoms and a celiac mother. It's maddening!

Here's my question


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



confusedks Enthusiast
I'm so fed up with the whole idea of how celiac is diagnosed (especially after going through 3 doctors that had no clue about it), so now I'm considering the Enterolab test. I can't stand that I would otherwise have to damage my body on purpose, maybe for years just to get a dx, even when I have all the symptoms and a celiac mother. It's maddening!

Here's my question

Guest Lore

Just a work of caution:

I have a friend going through medical school at UCLA who did some research on the enterolab testing for me because I too am curious about getting an accurate test result (for once) and he said that although in theory it makes sense, the doctor who has patented the idea for enterolab testing has never published any of his findings for the public to acknowledge. Although this may not be a factor on whether or not his information is credible, it is something to take into consideration that other people cannot study his official results. Apparently, there was one scholarly journal a few years ago that did a minor study on it and claimed it only worked a small percentage of the time, however, they only had 6 patients try it out. Either way you look at it, the data is not publically available to support the idea. However, it sounds like it could be blossoming soon. The choice is yours, but please consider what sources you're relying on before jumping on board. Good luck!

confused Community Regular

I think it is a good place to start at. Of ocurse if it shows u are highly gluten intolerant and you take away gluten and in an yr, you are still feeling good, then you need to look deeper in what is causing you to feel the way that you do. You could intolerant due to candida, metals, mold, lyme or parasites just to name a few.

i tested threw them and blood test and was positive for both, but i wasnt 100 percent after giving up gluten and casein, so then i had to give up soy. I felt good for awhile then i found out i also had candida and i am now on that diet and feeling awesome.

paula

aikiducky Apprentice

Enterolab doesn't give a celiac diagnosis. Basically what they claim is that anybody who tests positive for gluten intolerance on their test would feel better cutting out gluten. If you already cut out gluten and feel better, you already know that. :)

Pauliina

jenrn Apprentice

I did the enterolab testing for two reasons after I tested negative on the traditional celiac tests. I wanted to see if I had the genes to see if I could basically rule out celiac forever (although I do know there are some people who have celiac without having the two identified genes). I also wanted to do the tests in case they do become accepted by the medical community down the road. Then I will already have the results. I am really happy I did the enterolab tests because it did identify me as gluten sensitive and also showed that I carry two copies of the DQ2 gene. That was enough for me to go gluten free and the results have been amazing for me.

Jen

danandbetty1 Newbie
Just a work of caution:

I have a friend going through medical school at UCLA who did some research on the enterolab testing for me because I too am curious about getting an accurate test result (for once) and he said that although in theory it makes sense, the doctor who has patented the idea for enterolab testing has never published any of his findings for the public to acknowledge. Although this may not be a factor on whether or not his information is credible, it is something to take into consideration that other people cannot study his official results. Apparently, there was one scholarly journal a few years ago that did a minor study on it and claimed it only worked a small percentage of the time, however, they only had 6 patients try it out. Either way you look at it, the data is not publically available to support the idea. However, it sounds like it could be blossoming soon. The choice is yours, but please consider what sources you're relying on before jumping on board. Good luck!

To me I feel better on the diet so i stay on it. If you read all the questions they ask you to see if you may have it and you say yes, you do. To me the test just confirms you answered the questions correctly. The diet is hard when you are traveling or are in a hurry. You have to change your life to fit the diet. If you feel good on the diet stay on it. Other wise get tested to maybe comfirm you have it. Dan


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ginsou Explorer

My blood tests for celiac were negative. If I hadn't had the Enterolab tests done, I never would have known that I also have the double genes, and also have a casein and soy problem. I had stopped gluten on my own, and still was in a lot of pain and ended up in the emergency room with no insurance coverage. All their tests were also normal. I had replaced much of my gluten products with soy products, which was making me even sicker. Without those Enterolab tests, I never would have know what the real problem was. The gastro doctor that I will be seeing in August (I have medical coverage then) not only believes in Enterolab, he encourages his patients to have the tests done when the conventional blood tests are negative.

Gwen B Rookie
My blood tests for celiac were negative. If I hadn't had the Enterolab tests done, I never would have known that I also have the double genes, and also have a casein and soy problem. I had stopped gluten on my own, and still was in a lot of pain and ended up in the emergency room with no insurance coverage. All their tests were also normal. I had replaced much of my gluten products with soy products, which was making me even sicker. Without those Enterolab tests, I never would have know what the real problem was. The gastro doctor that I will be seeing in August (I have medical coverage then) not only believes in Enterolab, he encourages his patients to have the tests done when the conventional blood tests are negative.

This is a good to know. I have just received my results back from Enterolab confirming my sensitivity to gluten, the fat malabsorption test also explains my mild anemia. I have been gluten-free, CF, SF, and can't tolerate Tapioca flour either. These things I worked out for myself because my dr didn't think there was much likelyhood of the disease and would not test me further, since my symptoms when glutened are not terrible, just not pleasant and I was so very tired all the time before now.

However, the numbers will enable me to talk to my family who don't always believe in clearing their crumbs up, and forget not to 'double dip' spoons etc. I also now know that since I carry both gluten sensitive genes that both my kids will need to be aware of possible symptoms and I have more than good reason now to ask the Dr. to test them also for celiac. I also now know that I have inherited these genes from both my parents. My mother already knows she is celiac and has been gluten-free for two years but my father who has 'stomach upsets' several times a year and intermittant lactose intolerance could benefit from testing.

I hope that as more us present information about celiac/gluten intolerance the doctors will get informed and not dismiss the cumalative evidence demonstrating that gluten intolerance is not such a rare thing and avoidance of gluten can prevent other ailments other than villous atrophy.

home-based-mom Contributor
Apparently, there was one scholarly journal a few years ago that did a minor study on it and claimed it only worked a small percentage of the time, however, they only had 6 patients try it out.

Just curious ~ what did they compare it to to claim that it only worked a small percentage of the time? The conventional blood test that is so often a false negative? The scope that is so often a false negative? What made them decide it only worked a small percentage of the time? Inquiring minds want to know! :rolleyes:

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I've had the blood tests and the biopsy. Both were inconclusive, but both suggested that "something" was going on, even if the doctors could not quite put a name to it. I went on the gluten free diet, and have had a terrific dietary response.

I went ahead and did the gene testing for my own benefit, so I could determine whether or not my genes might play into a part of the puzzle, at some point. And, I've discovered that I have a Celiac gene and a gluten intolerance gene. So, being on a gluten-free diet is highly beneficial for me, regardless.

I wish Dr. Fine would publish so that the skeptics would be able to stop being skeptical. =)

Mom23boys Contributor

I have been going to drs since I was 11 to try and figure out what was wrong with me (I turn 42 this year). Hubby (and his siblings) has had this odd rash all his life and has seen drs but with no real info. They all just want to start giving us an arsenal of pills and not really spending the time to find out what is wrong. If we go to a new dr, they just want to reinvent the wheel. Not a one of them have even been remotely close to what is going on.

Last year we took my oldest to a special needs person who is also certified in nutrition. She suggested a gluten-free trial for him. She also said we looked like we needed it too. I don't know what we look like that cued her in but we did it. Research brought us to that lab. We liked the fact that we could order it and bypass a dr's order. We also liked the fact that we did not have to go back on gluten.

The results we have received the better info from this test than we have from drs. It may not be 100% yes or 100% no but it is much more info than we have had. I know we are on the right track now and it is not in our head as one dr suggested. We have confirmed hubby's genes and his Mom is going to be tested. (She will probably go traditional medical route) I know my two little kids have taken off on a growth binge since we have been 100% gluten-free (just a few weeks). Their chiropractor commented at last visit. Hubby's rash is less severe. Even my skin issues have cleared up. My dyslexic kid has gone on a reading binge. I could go on. For whatever reason gluten has been holding us back.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I also wanted to add... you do not have to have a diagnosis of Celiac to have the ability to follow a gluten free diet in a hospital setting.

If you are admitted, for whatever reason, simply tell them that you are gluten free. You'll have to examine your food options and scrutinize every little thing to make sure it IS gluten free, but they can't deny you gluten free meals simply because you don't have an official diagnosis.

Diabetics don't have to "prove" they have diabetes, people who need low or no salt menus don't have to prove they have a disease or condition that warrants it. Same with Celiac. Consider a vegetarian... diet is usually choice. Hospitals don't force them to eat meat.

My daughter was hospitalized last summer, we weren't required to have anything in writing or anything for them to follow the diet with her. Granted, she didn't have a lot of choices, but there definitely were gluten-free options for her.

=)

I HTH!

Mom23boys Contributor
I also wanted to add... you do not have to have a diagnosis of Celiac to have the ability to follow a gluten free diet in a hospital setting.

The hospital food was the only good thing about the hospital I had my first 2 babies in. They made an "issue" specific meal fit for royalty. The chef was the only person there who got it!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,963
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pat Martin
    Newest Member
    Pat Martin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @CeliacNew, If you are Vegan to help you feel better, reconsider returning to omnivore.  Actually, since you are already on a very restrictive diet, transitioning to gluten free might be easier for you.  Read the ingredient labels, Particularly vitamin D and Choline require supplements for vegan diet because our primary source is sun, eggs and beef.  B12 also.
    • Wheatwacked
      Once you've completed testing and still don't have improvement, start a trial gluten free diet.  Looking for imprvement that may indicate Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, which is 10 times more prevalent than Celiac Disease. Deficiencies in vitamins B6, B12, D, and C can manifest as skin rashes.  Virtual guaranty you are deficient in vitamin D.
    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
×
×
  • Create New...