Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With Test Results Please!


Darcie

Recommended Posts

Darcie Newbie

Would somebody please help me? I just got my test results back and I'm confused!

Antigliadin Abs, IgA 1 Neg 0-4

Antigliadin Abs, IgG 1 Neg 0-9

t-Transglutimase (tTG) IgG 1 Neg 0-5

Endomysial Antibody IgA Neg

**Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 42 70-400

I have Hashimoto's thyroiditis (hypothyroidism) and fibromyalgia (could all these symptoms be celiac disease?). My most recent Vit D test was deficient AGAIN (it has been for at least 2 years--this time not just low but REALLY low). I'm not having a lot of the stomach problems that some with celiac have but a lot of the other "silent" symptoms. I have a GI apt in 3 weeks and having to wait knowing what I'm eating could be hurting me more is driving me crazy!! I can deal with the gluten free diet I just need to know if it's celiac or not. I know there's somebody out there with a lot more experience in this than me--what are your thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

You may want to ask your doctor if your IgA total (42) is considered IgA deficient. If you are IgA deficient, the AGA IgA, EMA IgA, and tTG IgA tests won't be as accurate for you.

Keep eating gluten until your appointment and all testing is completed.

Ask your doctor about the new pill cam for diagnosing Celiac. It appears to be more accurate than a regular biopsy.

for info: Open Original Shared Link

From: Open Original Shared Link

Selective IgA deficiency (SIgA deficiency)

SIgA deficiency occurs 10 to 15 times more commonly among people with celiac disease compared to the general population [19]. Patients with SIgA deficiency will lack IgA antibodies including endomysial antibody, tTG and IgA AGA. To detect celiac disease in patients with SIgA deficiency an IgG antibody, typically IgG AGA, needs to be performed together with total IgA level. Alternatively, one may screen with IgG anti- EMA or IgG anti-tTG, though these are not widely available. Typically the patient with celiac disease and SIgA deficiency will have a positive IgG AGA and absent total IgA level. This combination should prompt a biopsy, whereas an isolated positive IgG AGA would usually not.

Darcie Newbie

Thank you so much for your help--I assumed my IgA total of 42 was deficient when the lab report said normal was 70-400 and it was written in bold indicating out of normal limits. My family physician had nothing else to say regarding the results (I know she didn't know what to do as I gave her the celiac panel of blood tests to perform) but she did refer me to a GI doc.

So, from somebody who has not as well versed in this as you, let me try to sum up.

It looks like I very well could have Selective IgA deficiency. However, because that number is low the other tests are not accurate and "to detect celiac disease in patients with SIgA deficiency an IgG antibody, typically IgG AGA, needs to be performed together with total IgA level."

And those results would need to look like this to diagnose celiac disease: Typically the patient with celiac disease and SIgA deficiency will have a positive IgG AGA and absent total IgA level. This combination should prompt a biopsy, whereas an isolated positive IgG AGA would usually not.

So, it looks like more blood tests, wait and see what they say and then possibly a biopsy. I sure do hope the pill camera is available--the alternative doesn't sound like fun...

Thanks again for clarifying this for me--it sure makes it easier to wait.

aikiducky Apprentice

You might discuss going straight for the biopsy when you meet your GI doc. Blood tests are often negative in adults, even if they are not IgA deficient, and some people still show positive on the biopsy despite the negative blood tests. Personally I would also consider trying the gluten free diet anyway, AFTER all the testing is done and whatever the test results are, to see if would help.

Pauliina

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,601
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dale S
    Newest Member
    Dale S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.