Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoroughly Confused

jbuckeye

Recommended Posts

jbuckeye Newbie
jbuckeye
Posted

I'm hoping someone can help me. Two years ago, with a tTg of 76, an endoscopy (which the gastroenterologist said looked like a "classic textbook case of celiac disease"), and a positive biopsy, I was diagnosed with celiac disease. I went on a gluten free diet; symptoms disappeared; life was good. Fast forward to today. My mom wanted to know if she had celiac disease, so she submitted a cheek sample to Kimball Labs. The results came back DQ2 positive. So she asks me if I will take the test because she wants to know if I'm DQ2 or DQ8. I send off my cheek sample, and it came back today negative for DQ2 and 8 with big writing that says, "It is highly unlikely that this patient has celiac disease."

So--could the gastroenterologist have been wrong? Is there some other condition that would explain a high tTg and positive biopsy? Help. Very confused.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
I'm hoping someone can help me. Two years ago, with a tTg of 76, an endoscopy (which the gastroenterologist said looked like a "classic textbook case of celiac disease"), and a positive biopsy, I was diagnosed with celiac disease. I went on a gluten free diet; symptoms disappeared; life was good. Fast forward to today. My mom wanted to know if she had celiac disease, so she submitted a cheek sample to Kimball Labs. The results came back DQ2 positive. So she asks me if I will take the test because she wants to know if I'm DQ2 or DQ8. I send off my cheek sample, and it came back today negative for DQ2 and 8 with big writing that says, "It is highly unlikely that this patient has celiac disease."

So--could the gastroenterologist have been wrong? Is there some other condition that would explain a high tTg and positive biopsy? Help. Very confused.

A positive biopsy is a little hard to deny. But...I don't know too much about the gene testing and will leave that to others.

bareden Newbie
bareden
Posted

I just read an article the other day that many males who have celiac do not have a positive DQ 2 and 8. I don't know if you are male or not but I will try to find a link to the article if you are interested.

jbuckeye Newbie
jbuckeye
Posted
  • Author

Thanks--am female, though.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

the two common genes do not cover all cases of celiac. not having dq2 or dq8 may make it less likely that you would have celiac, but doesn't in any way whatsoever make it impossible.

kdaley Newbie
kdaley
Posted

I am negative for DQ2 and DQ8, and female. I have 1/2 of the DQ2 gene, and have Celiacs, "Mine was highly unlikely, but still possible (like less than 1% chance, but still a chance - I seem to always fall into that category :))." Science still knows very little about all the factors that result in Celiacs. One member here told me that countries other than the United States include more genes in the diagnosis - I don't know what those are (anyone?).

Anyway, I have my life back since my diagnosis. If being Gluten Free did not solve a life time of pain for me, than I would be searching for a different diagnosis. I am happy where I am at!

Good Luck,

Kelly

aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted

What Tarnalberry said - all the genes for celiac aren't well researched yet, the two most common ones don't cover 100% of the celiacs. You probably just have a version of genes that the lab doesn't test for. I wouldn't argue with a positive biopsy and TTG and positive diet response though, you pretty much can't have more positive proof than that.

Pauliina

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

Mistyping does happen, especially if they use serotyping.

The wikipedia article explains more about that.

Open Original Shared Link

and they found thar some have half the gene and that is mised if they do not do an elecrtopheresis and test both alpha and beta chains.

Open Original Shared Link here they found some mistyped celiacs and some half genes and some DQ1 subtype 5 (why onearth do they just write DQA1*01-DQB*05 and not tell us that this is DQ1 subtype 5? is it so they do not have to give Dr. Hadjivassiliou right in that he found 20% of the gluten ataxia subjects in his research being DQ1??

And they found DQ7 and DQ9 celiacs:

Open Original Shared Link DQ7

Open Original Shared Link DQ9

And, they have found that the DQ genes only predispose only with a half. Now they found another location that predisposes for celiac. Your mom probably has this, and you too.

nora

jbuckeye Newbie
jbuckeye
Posted
  • Author

Thanks, everyone!

fedora Enthusiast
fedora
Posted

Did they tell you what genes you do have?

jbuckeye Newbie
jbuckeye
Posted
  • Author
Did they tell you what genes you do have?

No--they only looked for DQ2 and 8. I wonder if another lab would look for more. Is Enterolab a good lab to use?

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

Enterolab will tell you all the beta chains but not the alpha chains. Kimball I think will only tst for DQ2 or 8 but will check for alpha chains I think. Those not positive for DQ2 or 8 need the enterolab test to find out if they areDQ5,6, 7 or 9 or 4, I think.

I have not seen anyone posting with results form Kimball that they have half a DQ2 gene, though. But they do test for it, it sounds like.

Open Original Shared Link

nora

  • 2 weeks later...
jbuckeye Newbie
jbuckeye
Posted
  • Author

UPDATE:

Kimball reran my lab test and sent the sample out to a larger lab. (They were very helpful.)

Results: positive for DQ8.

Figures I'd have the rarer one....

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted
UPDATE:

Kimball reran my lab test and sent the sample out to a larger lab. (They were very helpful.)

Results: positive for DQ8.

Figures I'd have the rarer one....

Very intersting that they first told you that you were negative, and then re-ran the test and even sent it out to another lab.

D wonder how many others have just given up after they were told the test was negative.

I have re-read the wiki page on DQ and they give several reasons as to why people are mistyped.

Did they give you an explanation to why your first test was negative, and the second test was positive?

I suspect one lab used serotyping and the other used a different method.

On the wiki page they mention that the serotyping tests for DQ8 are not so sensitive I think.

Open Original Shared Link

Did the doctor question the gene test result and refer to the positive Ttg result and ask them to re-do the test? Or did you manage to get them to re-do the test?

Added: this may explain why the tests for DQ8 can be a bit difficult, as I can see 5 different Dq8 here:

Open Original Shared Link

and the other wiki page on DQ gives some reasons for mistyping.

nora

darlindeb25 Collaborator
darlindeb25
Posted

This is what I found in another forum, I think back in March--I truly believe this to be true. Scientist just do not know yet what genes truly do cause celiac, they only know a few, not all:

Open Original Shared Link

ScienceDaily (Mar. 5, 2008)
jbuckeye Newbie
jbuckeye
Posted
  • Author

I called Kimball and told them that it was very odd that I would be negative DQ2 and 8 since I was a biopsy proven celiac with a mother who was DQ2 positive and a paternal aunt with Celiac disease. They agreed and said they were going to rerun the test. I called a couple of days later, and they said that the picture was "getting clearer" and that they were sending my sample to a larger lab for gene sequencing--or maybe it was gene typing--can't remember-sorry. Very very interesting, but it makes me worry about other family members who have been told that they are DQ2 and 8 negative--like my son.

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

Wow , really thought-provoking.

Like Dr. Lewey writes. He has two patients who he thinks are mistyped.

I think the wiki DQ page has the anwer to what happened: They maybe used the cheap serotyping first.

"To detect these potential combinations one uses a technique called SSP-PCR (Sequence specific primer polymerase chain reaction). This techniques works because, outside of a few areas of Africa, we know the overwhelming majority of all DQ alleles in the world. The primers are specific for known DQ and thus, if a product is seen it means that gene motif is present. This results in nearly 100% accurate typing of DQA1 and DQB1 alleles."

So we have to request sequence specific primer polymerase chain reaction.

Now which lab does that? Kimball obviously does not. It would be interesting to know which lab does that.

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

Added: here it says Kimball uses PCR testing, the type that is better according to the Wikipedia page on DQ.

https://www.celiac.com/articles/834/1/-Your...dams/Page1.html

"PCR analysis for DQ2 alleles (DQA1*0501, DQA1*0505, and DQB1*0201/*0202) and DQ8 allele (DQB1*0302). "

Maybe their method was not sensitive enought for DQ8, or the method for DQ8 is more difficult, since tehre seem to be several different DQ8 gene types, or you have half a DQ8 gene and they only test the beta chain (according to their site they only test the beta chain for Dq8) ?

Anyway, the wikipedia page says tests for DQ2 are more accurate, leaving DQ8 less accurate by deduction....your case just proved that.

jbuckeye Newbie
jbuckeye
Posted
  • Author

It's VERY interesting and somewhat confusing. We're now waiting for my son's results from Kimball.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,007
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Ellen Watts
    Newest Member
    Ellen Watts
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • wellthatsfun
      confirmed via biopsy, quite depressed

      By wellthatsfun · Posted

      i am australian. we do have plenty of substitutes, but most are very expensive compared to the originals. i believe i'll just stick to home cooked meals and not have many treats at all. it's sad but it's just so much easier. also, ive heard far too many horror stories of people ordering gluten free food from restaurants and cafés, explicitly telling servers and kitchen staff that cross contamination is a strict no go, and they still get very sick. until i find a reasonably priced fully gluten free kitchen somewhere, i am not eating out for my safety and sanity.
    • wellthatsfun
      confirmed via biopsy, quite depressed

      By wellthatsfun · Posted

      thank you all for the kind words and support. it truly means a lot. i know i will adapt, it really just is a grieving process right now though. looking forward to feeling healthier!
    • The Logician
      Gluten Sensitivity

      By The Logician · Posted

      To Trent’s, yes, from what i’ve read it is not uncommon for digestive systems to become less tolerant to gluten over time. Many types of sensitivity or allergies arise in older people who never had a problem. I don’t see why you are focusing on anything but the fact that after years of my sensitivity to gluten, for whatever reason , it has disappeared after a bout of antibiotics. What i’ve read is antibiotics can make gluten sensitivity worse. In any event, in my case, if I can still eat all the wheat products I want with no reaction after a month or more since my hospital stay this is something that should be investigated. Time will tell.
    • The Logician
      Gluten Sensitivity

      By The Logician · Posted

      I had a UTI, blood cultures are standard to insure that the infection does not get in the bloodstream which can lead to sepsis and death. In my case there was bacteria in my blood which necessitated 48 hours of antibiotic IV
    • Wends
      Finally got in to doctor to get my referral and I lucked out and got into Gastro the same day - question about different transglutaminase results

      By Wends · Posted

      Hi Cameo674. just read your post. Well wishes to a correct diagnosis so that you can get on track to healing and feeling better. Personally I know it’s good to have the eosinophilic disorder ruled out too, as this can show anti-ttg igA antibodies too. But usually without the anti-gliadin antibodies unless gliadin is an allergen for you. Thanks for posting the link to look up SNPs rs… numbers on another post. Was useful. Looking at your result, ”Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies?” To me it reads.that you carry the high risk HLADQ2.5 haplotype.      
×
×
  • Create New...