Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should All Celiacs See Endocrinologists


es2443

Recommended Posts

es2443 Contributor

My mom is wondering whether I should be seeing an endocrinologist. I feel fine (no problems other than reactions to gluten and soy protein) but she asked me yesterday if Celiacs go to them. As a precaution should I see an endocrinologist?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Unless you have symptoms of hypo- or hyper thyroidism, or chronic fatigue which could indicate problems with your adrenal glands as well, or signs of diabetes, I see no good reason for seeing an endocrinologist.

2kids4me Contributor

As said in previous post, no unless you have an endocrine issue.

Celiac is an autoimmune condition - not an endocrine issue. Autoimmune conditions do occur more commonly in someone with another immune mediated illness, but it doesnt mean it will happen.

My children see an endocrinologist, but they both have endocrine issues - the celiac is addressed by a GI doc and he is aware of the link bnetween celiac and other conditions so he consults with the endo if he has questions about symptoms.

A GP can also test for conditions like thyroid, adrenal or diabetes and refer you if needed.

ShayFL Enthusiast

And even with symptoms, I found both Endocrinologists I saw COMPLETELY USELESS. Worse than regular doctors by far. When I was extremely hypthyroid and went to one, he said my labs were "normal" so I was fine. It was just stress. When I asked him why my body temperature was not even 97. He said you run cold. If you are every 98.6 then consider yourself to have a fever. I will not see one again. My doctor now knows more about our endocrine glands than those so called "specialists". My 2 cents....

Tim-n-VA Contributor

As usual with these anecdotes, we have only a short summary of the discussion but if your assessment of the doctor as a bad one is based only on his not worrying about a body temperature not being 98.6 than he is probably the well informed one.

An interesting article on this is at:

Open Original Shared Link

ShayFL Enthusiast

Those charts do not really tell us anything. Of course different studies will report different findings. Of course.

What I want to know is the status of every single person's thyroid in those studies. They say xxxx "healthy individuals". Yeah right!! What is "healthy"??

If you have dealt with hypothyroid and correlated it to your body temperature. And then with adequate treatment saw that closer to 98.6 gets rid of symptoms....you would understand. When my temp is 97 I cannot move from the bed. When it is above 98 I can move. When it is 98.6 - 99 I feel "normal". And this is the testimony of many hypothyroid patients. That doctor was bad. If not for his lack of text book experience, his clinical. There is a reason that hypothyroid individuals feel "cold" all of the time. They are.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

What the charts tell us is that there is no reason to accept as absolute fact that 98.6 is some special value. We don't know the status of every person's thyroid in any of the studies to include the ones years ago that lead to the establishment of 98.6 as normal. That is why it is the average temperature. Average is a statistical measure of the central tendency of the population. It is not a standard to where any deviation is significant. Both the general population and the medical profession sometimes look at it that way.

I stand by my conditional statement (that's a statement with an if) in my earlier post.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

Look Im not going to argue with you. 97 degrees isnt normal. Especially if you are freezing in the heat of the Florida Summer. Male doctors tend to dismiss female patients. And I see a gender biased response in here too. When your temperature used to run close to 98.6 and it drops to barely 97 and you are freezing all of the time and your Endocrinologist says it is normal and if you are 98.6 you have a fever, he my friend is a complete and utter idiot. Especially when all it took for a "real doctor" to do was talk to me and assess my symptoms. Prescribe replacement therapy and wait for the good results. Which happened.

Most Endocrinologists are useless. You can go to one, but you have been warned. A good doctor that will actually listen to you is worth more than a million so called specialists.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

The possible link is that Celiac is an autoimmune disease. There are varients of thyroid disease and diabetes that are also autoimmune conditions. Therefore, a celiac should be monitored for thyroid and blood sugar but that doesn't mean an automatic referral to an endocrinologist.

It does sound as if ShayFL had a bad experience with an endocrinologist but that doesn't mean they are all worthless and that no one should see one. That is just dangerous advice and the only reason I've participated in this thread. Otherwise this thread could have end with the good advice from Ursa Major and 2kids4me.

NicoleAJ Enthusiast

There are reasons why some celiacs would want to see an endocrinologist. I was referred to one by my GI who is a celiac specialist because my osteopenia continues to get worse even with aggressive treatment. My husband and I are also thinking about children, so we need to know how long I should be off of osteopenia treatment before trying to conceive. These are questions that most GIs and PCPs are not prepared to answer.

ShayFL Enthusiast

It was never my intention to offend anyone. I apologize to anyone who has been offended by my verbiage in this thread. I have asked the moderators to remove any offensive posts. Perhaps my discontent with Doctors should be left off of this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.