Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Result Q's


SGWhiskers

Recommended Posts

SGWhiskers Collaborator

I had my endoscopy in August. There is no question that I have Celiac and have been following a gluten free diet for 5 weeks with slight improvement. I have a couple of questions for veterans of the endoscopy process.

The results of the biopsy are a bit vague for my liking. "Duodenum, biopsies: Fully developed Sprue-like changes." Does anyone know what this means?

Also, the endoscopy noted "nodularity" among other things. What is the significance of nodularity in relation to celiac?

Hope all of you are recovering well and thanks for the input.

SGWhiskers


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

SG, you mention nodularity "among other things"...what other types of things were listed?

Here is some information on biopsies/Celiac:

Open Original Shared Link

SGWhiskers Collaborator
SG, you mention nodularity "among other things"...what other types of things were listed?

Here is some information on biopsies/Celiac:

Open Original Shared Link

Happy Girl,

Thanks for the response. The endoscopy report included the following statements regarding my upper intestines. "Diffuse severe mucosal abnormality characterized by scalloping, congestion, flattening and nodularity was found in the 2nd part of the duodenum." "Mucosal abnormality in the duodenum suspicious for celiac sprue." The biopsy report was the vague one that said "Fully-developed sprue like changes." I got some cool photos from the endoscopy where you can really see the flattening of the folds. I also had stomach "erethema" that was from NSAIDS. It took a month gluten free, but I'm off the NSAIDS now without feeling like I'm gonna cry from pain. There were 8 intestinal sampels, so the pathologist should have had at least one good one to describe.

By the way, that website is great. It is new to me and I've been searching the web every chance I get. I'm going back there now to explore further.

Thanks for any information you have.

SGWHISKERS

happygirl Collaborator

Sounds like you have a bona fide Celiac diagnosis - Guess the pathologist recognized it pretty quickly!

This board is a wonderful resource. Read, read, read, and ask, ask, ask.

Welcome to the board - happy you are here.

SGWhiskers Collaborator

Yeah, we pretty much knew going in that I had celiac, the endoscopy was just to confirm it. I wish the pathologist report had been more descriptive or gave a Marsh level. Does anyone know if "fully developed sprue like changes" corrolates to a marsh level, or at least some level of severity?

Also, what significance does the nodularity have? I know it is a sign of celiac, but does it indicate severity? malignancy?

Thanks for your help folks.

SGWhiskers

happygirl Collaborator

I would say that is a question (re: Marsh) that your doctor and/or pathologist need to answer for you .... and an answer that they owe you. Only the pathologist would know - others could guess, but its up to the pathologist's view an interpretation as to what that means.

mftnchn Explorer

I think the fully developed sprue like changes are "Diffuse severe mucosal abnormality characterized by scalloping, congestion, flattening and nodularity." There are some great sites showing endoscopies and celiac changes. Sorry don't have a link at the ready.

This means you had lots of visible damage, and didn't need the microscopic exam to clarify the diagnosis.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SGWhiskers Collaborator

Thank you for the advice folks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,242
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    dolphfan50
    Newest Member
    dolphfan50
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      It can take longer than 6 months for antibodies to drop to the normal range,  My DGP IgA took a few years as I got stricter and stricter about being gluten free  But having symptoms again could also mean you’re getting some gluten in your diet.
    • TexasCeliacNewbie
      Hi, I just had my 6 month check after being diagnosed Celiac 6 months ago.  All of my panel numbers were normal except: Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA (It is 31 with high being over 30)  I have also been having symptoms again. Am I not actually being as careful as I think I am or does it take longer than 6 months for this particular test to come back down?  I can't get ahold of my doctor this week as she is out.     Thank you!
    • Scott Adams
      That is very strange, because it looks to me like two very different test results, but for the same test! It's definitely time to contact your doctor for clarity on this.
    • Redanafs
      Same day which is strange to me. 
    • JForman
      Scott, thank you SO MUCH for this!! She has been through so much in the last three years as we've tried to track down answers. This language will definitely help me help her to reframe.
×
×
  • Create New...