Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosed W/ Too Many Food Allergies?


jsb727

Recommended Posts

jsb727 Newbie

I got tested for food allergies (prior to looking into celiac disease), and the test came back with TONS of food allergies. None of which I had ever noticed a reaction to before. Has anyone else experienced what I would call an "over-diagnosis" where they say you have tons of allergies you don't really have? I had the IgG Antibody Assessment through Genova Diagnostics.

The test showed I was allergic to dairy, alfalfa, broccoli, celery, cucumber, lemon, white potatoes, asparagus, cabbage, gluten, lettuce, spinich, avocado, cane sugar, corn, grapes, pecans, tomatoes, bananas, carrots, green peppers, and pineapple. Not to mention several others that were "low level."

My naturopath even said she'd never seen anyone's test come back with so many allergies. She had me go off all these items for 3 months to see if there was any change. I called her after two months (survived this diet from 12/1/07 to 2/1/08) and told her I couldn't take it any more. :blink: I still can't believe I made it through Christmas.

The only thing that concerns me is that even though I know I have celiac now, I have no symptoms if I eat something w/ gluten in it. I've been gluten-free for almost 4 months now (was diagnosed by biopsy in May). I'm sure I have to have had something with gluten in it within that time, either by cross contamination or accidentally. What if I just have no symptoms when I eat food I shouldn't eat?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rachel--24 Collaborator
I got tested for food allergies (prior to looking into celiac disease), and the test came back with TONS of food allergies.

I've been gluten-free for almost 4 months now (was diagnosed by biopsy in May). I'm sure I have to have had something with gluten in it within that time, either by cross contamination or accidentally. What if I just have no symptoms when I eat food I shouldn't eat?

I'm assuming that you must have had symptoms which led you to have the food intolerance testing....and then to be tested for Celiac Disease?

If you are now symptom free...(after having been diagnosed and after 4 months on the diet) I would probably consider that to be a sign that you are doing well on the diet and that you are healing.

If you are concerned that you may still be consuming gluten (without having any noticeable reaction) you can have your bloodwork repeated to be sure that the antibody levels are going down and that they stay down.

The IgG testing is for food intolerances......which are different from food allergies. Allergies are IgE mediated and it would be unusual to have that many "true" allergies.

IgG mediated food intolerances can be temporary and may have been a result of intestinal damage (leaky gut) caused by undiagnosed Celiac Disease.

Food intolerance reactions are typically delayed reactions.....it can be difficult to link a particular food to the symptoms and the symptoms may seem unrelated to diet.

If you are still experiencing symptoms that you think might be caused by accidental glutening or by additional food intolerance....I would recommend keeping a food journal to help figure out what might be causing it.

jsb727 Newbie

The original symptom I had that made me seek help is bone hypersensitivity (sometime around '93). Over the years I got sent to a couple rheumatologists, physical therapy, and a spine/sports specialist, none of which had the answer. I would go through phases where I would tell myself "this is not normal, someone should be able to diagnose this" and then I'd go to a couple doctors and not get any answers. So I'd wait a couple years and then go through the same series again. At one point I was diagnosed with fibromylgia (a diagnosis that didn't seem right to me... but I'm not a doctor). Finally I went to a naturopath, who tested me for food sensitivities, and eventually did the blood test for celiac at which point she referred me to a gastroenterologist for the upper endoscopy.

I have, however, noticed that I no longer get canker sores (which previously I had several of them at a time, and I would have them more often than not). I also don't have the sinus problems I've had for years. Those two symptoms I hadn't previously associated with gluten.

So, I don't get any symptoms from eating gluten or different foods. Although, I've gotten maybe 2 or 3 canker sores over the last several months... I haven't correlated it to eating gluten, but I'll keep an eye on it.

SGWhiskers Collaborator

My testing for food allergies was only for the big 8. I came back positive for Milk and Egg. I had never had what I would consider allergic symptoms before and was surprised by the food allergies. I eliminated every trace of milk and egg in my diet for 1.5 years. The only changes I noticed were elimination of canker sores, and (gross alert) healing of a very small fissure or maybe tiny bleeding hemorroid. This tiny bit of blood came back if I slipped up and ate any milk. Since my other (undiagnosed Celiac) symptoms were not better, I added milk and eggs back with no other problems. 7 weeks ago, I started the Celiac diet and reduced my milk and egg comsumption to just what was in a little milk chocolate. The little blood remained until I again cut out all milk 3 weeks ago. Logic tells me that that tiny speck of blood is indicative of continued damage in my lower digestive system. Not a coincedental hemorroid like my earlier MD thought.

Anyway, my point is that even if you can't see the intestinal damage from food allergies, it may very well be going on inside. My new/good doc has recommended that for the first 6 months of healing, I don't have any allergens. Then I give them a test one by one. I don't think I'm going to challenge for 2 years.

Of course, I don't have as many allergies as you. Or maybe I do and have not been tested. Good luck. I'm sorry about the restricted diet.

SGWhiskers

Juliebove Rising Star

My daughter was initially diagnosed with IgG allergies to wheat, gluten, peanuts, dairy, eggs, soy and banana. About 4 years later she was tested again. Now it is wheat, spelt, peas, lentils, peanuts and almonds.

The Dr. explained that those foods we eat a lot of tend to show as IgG allergies. She said my daughter could resume eating those foods she used to be allergic to, but only twice a week and not on consecutive days.

I was tested once and found to be allergic to dairy, eggs and almonds. I used to get canker sores when I'd get a virus, but have had them only a couple of times since and the last time they went away in a day. The dairy was also causing sinus and ear infections.

Amyleigh0007 Enthusiast

My son was dx with allergies to corn, wheat, egg whites, clam, soy, walnuts, and peanuts. His dr also told us that he could eat these foods but with limits. We have to watch how much he consumes and if he has any reactions (because he has never had any visible reactions). For example, he can have waffles that contain egg but I would never give him a scrambled egg. So far he has not had any reactions except the hives on his esophagus that was discovered when he had his biopsy. The dr didn't think that was a reason to totally avoid those foods. He said the gluten free diet was hard enough to follow, adding all the above foods to that list would make finding foods that a picky 8 year old would eat nearly impossible.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.