Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Options


lil voice

Recommended Posts

lil voice Newbie

Hello - I'm new here & am overwhelmed. I'm sure what I'm going to post is probably on the board somewhere, but I haven't got the energy to look (not because I don't care - I most definitely do). I just need pointed in the right direction, I guess.

My son is 22 months old & probably has celiac. It's been a long, rough, tiresome journey & beyond frustrating. I'm sure others of you can relate all to well. Anyway, I'll get to the point.

His GI doctor wants to test him for Celiac, wants to wait until he's older because of how very sensitive his system is. He also informed us that our son will have to have gluten in his diet for at least 2 months prior to doing the test.

Small snapshot - we took him off gluten/casein when he was 10 months old & had only had it for about 3 months. We figured out on our own that it was BAD for him. He was having developmental delays and even started regressing. The docs we saw all thought we were being too extreme & unnecessarily making our lives harder than need be. After only 3 weeks he started having huge improvements. If we hadn't seen it with our own eyes, we wouldn't have believed it. But that's a completely different story... I won't go there now.

So, we with every fiber of our beings, do NOT want to put our son through the misery of having gluten back in his diet. No way, no how. I've scratched the surface of our story & my limited reading so far shows that there are other tests available.

Can anyone tell me about the tests available for testing celiac. My husband & I heard that we could get tested to see if we have the genetic markers. What test is that? How reliable is it? And will it help us get a diagnosis for our son without him having to ingest "poison"?

I really appreciate any feedback or help with this.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Your doctor can order the genetic tests for Celiac. Having the genes does NOT equal having Celiac. About 1/3 of the American population has one of the genes, but less than 1% of Americans have Celiac.

You can ask your doctor to order:

HLA DQ2 and HLA DQ8

You do not have to put your child back on gluten. Your doctor can want you to, but you don't HAVE to.

You may want to find a local support group to provide referrals for doctors in your area who deal with Celiac.

ShayFL Enthusiast

I agree that you do not need a doctor's permission to keep your son gluten-free.

If your doctor will not order the genetic test, you can use Enterolab or Kimball (pay out of pocket, but dont need a doctor's order).

Congratulations on getting your son well!!

sbj Rookie

Hi Li'l Voice:

Perhaps you could write a bit more about your story so that the smart ones here can provide a bit more help. Your post confused me a little bit - probably because you had to leave out some detail. Please come back and provide the detail - we're interested!

Why are you seeing a gastroenterologist right now (at 22 months)? It sounds like you stopped gluten at 10 months and it helped. So what is happening right now even after being off gluten? I am concerned that he is still having problems even after being off gluten for a year. And I don't understand why your doc wants to test for celiac when he is having other problems. Maybe the doc wants to do an endoscopy to look for other things and would like to check for celiac at the same time?

If I were you I would tell your doctor, "We took him off gluten already. I don't care if he has celiac - I want to find out what's bugging him now! Because it ain't gluten!"

What kind of test does your doc want to do? Is he telling you that a blood test is too much for the little one? Or does he want to do an endoscopy? A blood test coupled with positive reaction to the gluten-free diet is enough for a celiac diagnosis - there should be no need to perform an endoscopy for a diagnosis.

You never have to let your son eat gluten again. Don't let this joker boss you around when it comes to your child's health!

The problem with testing outside of your own doctor is that you probably won't get an 'official' diagnosis. I believe someone else already wrote, a positive test for the genetic markers won't tell you if your son has celiac disease. The other testing available from Entero won't diagnose celiac disease, either. At most I think that either of these tests are going to tell you that your son has the genetic capabiity for celiac or has gluten intolerance.

But you already know that your son has gluten intolerance, right? So why not save the money?

lil voice Newbie

Just checking in & actually on my way out the door. I appreciate the comments so far & would be happy to give you my son's unabridged story - I did leave out quite a lot. For right now I'll try to hit more of the highlights.

Loads of allergies suspected - 3 skin prick tests & on 4th allergist, who I finally like. She explained that even though his test didn't show reactions YET, she thinks he's highly allergic to many things & when he's 4-5 years old we'll be able to tell better (with more exposure build-up). She recommended the GI doc route because she suspected celiac or some other gi issue.

GI doc based on my very detailed notes & his examination doesn't think it's any kind of inflammatory issue with the gi. He strongly suspects celiac is the culprit.

My son has only truly been gluten free for about a month - we missed some hidden sources like medications, just lack of knowledge on our part and no professional help until recently. My son also was ingesting large quantities of rice milk as his dairy from 10 months until 15 months - that with a lot of digging we were able to find out had loads of barley in it & not labeled! As soon as we stopped the rice milk his "seizure-type" activity stopped.

GI doc said he had to have gluten in his diet for 2 months prior to test to get more reliable results. He said it was a blood test. And depending on the results of that an endoscopy would need done.

Still leaving out tons of details, but hope this helps more. When we read the symptoms for the disease, it seems to fit like a glove... and it was our gut thought to the initial problems that started.

For doing the HLA tests - that would be my son doing them not us? Is it reliable with him already being gluten free?

Thanks again for the input.

happygirl Collaborator

Gene testing would be your son, correct.

Genes are not affected (in terms of testing) by being gluten free or not. You either have none, one, or both. About 95%+ of those with Celiac have one or both of the genes.

TracyB Apprentice
Just checking in & actually on my way out the door. I appreciate the comments so far & would be happy to give you my son's unabridged story - I did leave out quite a lot. For right now I'll try to hit more of the highlights.

Loads of allergies suspected - 3 skin prick tests & on 4th allergist, who I finally like. She explained that even though his test didn't show reactions YET, she thinks he's highly allergic to many things & when he's 4-5 years old we'll be able to tell better (with more exposure build-up). She recommended the GI doc route because she suspected celiac or some other gi issue.

GI doc based on my very detailed notes & his examination doesn't think it's any kind of inflammatory issue with the gi. He strongly suspects celiac is the culprit.

My son has only truly been gluten free for about a month - we missed some hidden sources like medications, just lack of knowledge on our part and no professional help until recently. My son also was ingesting large quantities of rice milk as his dairy from 10 months until 15 months - that with a lot of digging we were able to find out had loads of barley in it & not labeled! As soon as we stopped the rice milk his "seizure-type" activity stopped.

GI doc said he had to have gluten in his diet for 2 months prior to test to get more reliable results. He said it was a blood test. And depending on the results of that an endoscopy would need done.

Still leaving out tons of details, but hope this helps more. When we read the symptoms for the disease, it seems to fit like a glove... and it was our gut thought to the initial problems that started.

For doing the HLA tests - that would be my son doing them not us? Is it reliable with him already being gluten free?

Thanks again for the input.

If it were me I would have myself and my husband tested first - because if one of you has celiac than it is even more likely your son could have it. You can then decide from there what to do about diagnosis for your son. There is a higher likelihood of somebody with celiac disease having a parent with celiac so get yourself and your husband tested (blood) to see if one of you has it.

The gene test will not be conclusive to celiac - but at least a blood test and subsequent biopsy if needed, will be proof that you're on the right track regarding your son.

Best of luck,

TracyB


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      nothing has changed

    2. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    4. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    5. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.