Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dr Has Me Confused


missmommy

Recommended Posts

missmommy Contributor

:huh: i went to meet my new gi today because of pain in my lower stomach. two weeks ago i had an abdominal ultrasound and they saw polyps in gallbladder. but my doc also wanted to send me to a gi to get checked out.

im not really sure how much the guy knows about celiac, but he wants to biopsy my small intestine next week (i have been gluten-free for almost a year and half) he said it is possible for my body to still be acting like im ingesting gluten. i have never heard of this, i think he called it celiac reflux or something that sounded like that. he said my body might still be attacking its self. sorry if im not explaining it that well. he had me totally confused, he was talking real quick. he also said he wants to do it as soon as possible, like in 2 days. (im not going till next week though, i wanted to stall) he also wants me to go get my colonoscopy soon after and something else but i already forgot what it was. he said if he finds my small intestine inflamed he will put me on steroids and proboinics (i not sure i have that right).

im confused, so i was hoping some of you could tell me if this is routine celiac stuff?? i dont want to get stuff done that doesnt have to be done, or by someone who may not really know about celiac. and i cant just get anther dr, its not that easy, we are military and it takes forever! i would need to start all over, go back to my regular dr get new referal, wait at least another month to meet new gi.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Lakefront Brewery
Daura Damm



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
HomeFree Treats


ShayFL Enthusiast

I think this is what he was talking about:

What is refractory celiac disease?

Refractory celiac disease is a rare condition in which the symptoms of celiac disease (and the loss of villi) do not improve despite many months of a strict gluten free diet. Before making a diagnosis of refractory celiac disease it is important to exclude complications of celiac disease and other co-existing conditions that can produce similar symptoms. It is believed by many knowledgeable physicians that refractory celiac disease is a malignant condition, that is, it is a cancer.

What is the treatment for refractory celiac disease?

The treatment of refractory celiac disease is first to make sure that all gluten is eliminated from the diet. If there still is no improvement, medications are used. Corticosteroids such as prednisone have been used successfully in treating some patients with refractory celiac disease. Immuno-suppressive drugs (medications that suppress a person's immune system) such as azathioprine and cyclosporine also have been used. (These drugs also are used in treating some types of cancer.) Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs are potent medications with potentially serious side effects. Many patients with refractory celiac disease are malnourished and have weakened immune systems, and corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents can further increase their risk of serious infections. Thus doctors experienced with treating celiac disease should monitor treatment of refractory celiac disease.

Unfortunately in some patients with refractory celiac disease, malabsorption and malnutrition progress despite drugs. In these patients the intravenous route is the only way to deliver nutrition. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a way of delivering calories, carbohydrates, amino acids, and fat in liquid solutions via a catheter that has been inserted and secured into a vein.

missmommy Contributor

i read the response with my husband.... i hope thats not what my problem is! that is scary stuff!!!

but if its rare, hopefully i just have some common easliy fixed thing ;) i mean if i gotta wish for a gut problem, that aint the one i want :P

Lisa Mentor

It might be a good idea to retest a Celiac Blood Panel to make sure that you are not getting any hidden gluten into your diet.

Refractory Sprue is indeed rare. It would not be unusual for someone to take up to a couple years to heal. And, also for some, an occassional glutening could set healing back for a good while.

It's good that your doctor is trying to rule out other concerns.

Jaimepsalm63 Rookie

Your doctor sounds very proactive, which is a good thing. Most doctors....ok, the ones I've run into as of late, try to pass everything off to IBS (which makes me want to scream). Go with it. It's better to have the knowledge that these tests can give you instead of not knowing anything. If all else fails, it confirms or rules out how well your diet is going and the healing process.

Blessings,

Jaime

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    GliadinX
    Little Northern Bakehouse




    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):

    Authentic Foods



  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Bahama Rice Burger



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX



  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Food for Life


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.