Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Iga


Sharon C.

Recommended Posts

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

My son was diagnosed last Septmeber with Celiac Disease. Since I also have issues with food, I am trying to determine whether I may also have a gluten intolerance.

I discussed it with my doctor who seemed to not have a lot of knowledge about the subject. I asked for the gluten IgA antibody test. The nurses in the office never had to write up that blood test before and they called the lab directly and asked what test it was and filled out a slip for me to take to them.

I had the test done and am waiting for results. My problem is, I have very little confidence that anyone knows what they are doing. I wonder if they did the right test, and I wonder if my doctor will understand the results. I called up and wanted the nurse to give me the antibody level over the phone, but she said she can't. The doctor would let me know if anything was "wrong" when he calls later.

Is there an exact name for the blood test I need? And can anyone tell me the proper number that I, an an adult female, should be over or under to consider myself either tolerant or intolerant? Thanks. I think it shouldn't be over 30, but I'm not sure. If it shows that I am intolerant, I am just going to go gluten free regardless. So I don't know if I need to go ahead with an endoscopy. I won't be eating it anymore anyway.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiac3270 Collaborator

If it's the EMA IgA, it will only read positive or negative (with no numbers). They probably ran the Antigliadin IgA. For that test, normal levels are less than 18. For the tTG IgA, normal levels are less than 13, but I suspect it'll be the antigliadin :)

Now, one positive test isn't enough to diagnose you completely or completely dismiss celiac. It's helpful also to do the Antigliadin IgG.

This table explains whether you should suspect celiac disease or not, based on which tests are positive or negative.

EMA IgA/AGA IgA/AGA IgG/Interpretation

+ + + celiac disease 99% Probable

+ - + celiac disease probable

+ + - celiac disease probable

+ - - celiac disease probable

- + + celiac disease less likely

- - + celiac disease less likely

- + - celiac disease less likely

- - - celiac disease very unlikely

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

Well, I have my results, only, they are not plus's or minus's like the chart above.

My IGA is 6, my IGG is 15. What does that sound like?

My doctor will not likely run any further tests because in his opinion, these blood tests are negative. If I do the entero lab, do I need to eat large amounts of gluten first, or can I take it anytime? Thanks.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

The results don't come in plus and minus' like above. He was using that to interpret the resulsts. The + means a positive and the - means negative and then they are color coded with IgA, IgG, etc. To me the levels don't seem high.. I think they are in the normal range but I am not sure about that one. Did they test you for tTG? There are certain tests that are more specific for celiac then others.

celiac3270 Collaborator

Both are within normal range. Did he do an EMA IgA or just the antigliadin. If the EMA came back positive (it only comes back pos. or neg.), then celiac disease is probable. Otherwise, it is very unlikely that you have celiac.

The + and - symbols said that if you have a positive result in this and a positive result in that, then...it's very likely, unlikely, etc. For actual normal ranges, the Antigliadin IgA is less than 18 (you're 6) and for the Antigliadin IgG, it's less than 24 (you're 15). You tested negative in both. So, if you look at the color-coded thing I had in an above post, you'd see that a positive EMA IgA would mean that you're probably celiac...if the EMA was negative, it's extremely unlikely that you have celiac disease.

Oh, Kaiti was right. They do come in numbers, not as positive or negative. The only test that comes back as + or - is the EMA IgA

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Yeah the one says positive or negative right on the results but the others come in numbers. celiac3270 is right it is very unlikely if EMA came back negative along with your other ones then you probably do not have it. One thing about just the IgA anti-gliadan is that many celiacs can be IgA deficient so you should get the EMA done and other tests done specifically for celiac :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      2

      Am I nuts?

    2. - Russ H posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      0

      Anti-endomysial Antibody (EMA) Testing

    3. - Scott Adams replied to JoJo0611's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Just diagnosed today

    4. - Scott Adams replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      2

      Am I nuts?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      28

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,805
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lalan45
    Newest Member
    lalan45
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @GlorietaKaro! As Scott indicated, without formal testing for celiac disease, which would require you to have been consuming generous amounts of gluten daily for weeks, it would be not be possible to distinguish whether you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Their symptoms overlap. The difference being that celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the lining of the small bowel. We actually no more about celiac disease than we do about NCGS, the mechanism of the latter being more difficult to classify. There are specific antibody tests for celiac disease diagnosis and there is also the endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining. Currently, there are no tests to diagnose NCGS. Celiac disease must first ruled out. Researchers are working on developing testing methods to diagnose celiac disease that do not require a "gluten challenge" which is just out of the question for so many because it poses serious, even life-threatening, health risks. But we aren't there yet.
    • Russ H
      I thought this might be of interest regarding anti-EMA testing. Some labs use donated umbilical cord instead of monkey oesophagus. Some labs just provide a +ve/-ve test result but others provide a grade by testing progressively diluted blood sample. https://www.aesku.com/index.php/ifu-download/1367-ema-instruction-manual-en-1/file Fluorescence-labelled anti-tTG2 autoantibodies bind to endomysium (the thin layer around muscle fibres) forming a characteristic honeycomb pattern under the microscope - this is highly specific to coeliac disease. The binding site is extracellular tTG2 bound to fibronectin and collagen. Human or monkey derived endomysium is necessary because tTG2 from other mammals does not provide the right binding epitope. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/3/1012
    • Scott Adams
      First, please know that receiving two diagnoses at once, especially one you've never heard of, is undoubtedly overwhelming. You are not alone in this. Your understanding is correct: both celiac disease and Mesenteric Panniculitis (MP) are considered to have autoimmune components. While having both is not extremely common, they can co-occur, as chronic inflammation from one autoimmune condition can sometimes be linked to or trigger other inflammatory responses in the body. MP, which involves inflammation of the fat tissue in the mesentery (the membrane that holds your intestines in place), is often discovered incidentally on scans, exactly as in your case. The fact that your medical team is already planning follow-up with a DEXA scan (to check bone density, common after a celiac diagnosis) and a repeat CT is a very proactive and prudent approach to monitoring your health. Many find that adhering strictly to the gluten-free diet for celiac disease helps manage overall inflammation, which may positively impact MP over time. It's completely normal to feel uncertain right now. Your next steps are to take this one day at a time, focus on the gluten-free diet as your primary treatment for celiac, and use your upcoming appointments to ask all your questions about MP and what the monitoring plan entails. This dual diagnosis is a lot to process, but it is also the starting point for a managed path forward to better health. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is absolutely valid, and you are not "nuts" or a "complete weirdo." What you are describing aligns with severe neurological manifestations of gluten sensitivity, which is a recognized, though less common, presentation. Conditions like gluten ataxia and peripheral neuropathy are documented in medical literature, where gluten triggers an autoimmune response that attacks the nervous system, leading to symptoms precisely like yours—loss of coordination, muscle weakness, fasciculations, and even numbness. The reaction you had from inhaling flour is a powerful testament to your extreme sensitivity. While celiac disease is commonly tested, non-celiac gluten sensitivity with neurological involvement is harder to diagnose, especially since many standard tests require ongoing gluten consumption, which you rightly fear could be dangerous. Seeking out a neurologist or gastroenterologist familiar with gluten-related disorders, or consulting a specialist at a major celiac research center, could provide more validation and possibly explore diagnostic options like specific antibody tests (e.g., anti-gliadin or transglutaminase 6 antibodies) that don't always require a gluten challenge. You are not alone; many individuals with severe reactivity navigate a world of invisible illness where their strict avoidance is a medical necessity, not a choice. Trust your body's signals—it has given you the most important diagnosis already.
    • Scott Adams
      Some members here take GliadinX (a sponsor here) if they eat out in restaurants or outside their homes. It has been shown in numerous studies to break down small amounts of gluten in the stomach, before it reaches your intestines. This would be for small amounts of cross-contamination, and it would not allow any celiac to eat gluten again.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.