Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Iga


Sharon C.

Recommended Posts

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

My son was diagnosed last Septmeber with Celiac Disease. Since I also have issues with food, I am trying to determine whether I may also have a gluten intolerance.

I discussed it with my doctor who seemed to not have a lot of knowledge about the subject. I asked for the gluten IgA antibody test. The nurses in the office never had to write up that blood test before and they called the lab directly and asked what test it was and filled out a slip for me to take to them.

I had the test done and am waiting for results. My problem is, I have very little confidence that anyone knows what they are doing. I wonder if they did the right test, and I wonder if my doctor will understand the results. I called up and wanted the nurse to give me the antibody level over the phone, but she said she can't. The doctor would let me know if anything was "wrong" when he calls later.

Is there an exact name for the blood test I need? And can anyone tell me the proper number that I, an an adult female, should be over or under to consider myself either tolerant or intolerant? Thanks. I think it shouldn't be over 30, but I'm not sure. If it shows that I am intolerant, I am just going to go gluten free regardless. So I don't know if I need to go ahead with an endoscopy. I won't be eating it anymore anyway.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiac3270 Collaborator

If it's the EMA IgA, it will only read positive or negative (with no numbers). They probably ran the Antigliadin IgA. For that test, normal levels are less than 18. For the tTG IgA, normal levels are less than 13, but I suspect it'll be the antigliadin :)

Now, one positive test isn't enough to diagnose you completely or completely dismiss celiac. It's helpful also to do the Antigliadin IgG.

This table explains whether you should suspect celiac disease or not, based on which tests are positive or negative.

EMA IgA/AGA IgA/AGA IgG/Interpretation

+ + + celiac disease 99% Probable

+ - + celiac disease probable

+ + - celiac disease probable

+ - - celiac disease probable

- + + celiac disease less likely

- - + celiac disease less likely

- + - celiac disease less likely

- - - celiac disease very unlikely

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

Well, I have my results, only, they are not plus's or minus's like the chart above.

My IGA is 6, my IGG is 15. What does that sound like?

My doctor will not likely run any further tests because in his opinion, these blood tests are negative. If I do the entero lab, do I need to eat large amounts of gluten first, or can I take it anytime? Thanks.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

The results don't come in plus and minus' like above. He was using that to interpret the resulsts. The + means a positive and the - means negative and then they are color coded with IgA, IgG, etc. To me the levels don't seem high.. I think they are in the normal range but I am not sure about that one. Did they test you for tTG? There are certain tests that are more specific for celiac then others.

celiac3270 Collaborator

Both are within normal range. Did he do an EMA IgA or just the antigliadin. If the EMA came back positive (it only comes back pos. or neg.), then celiac disease is probable. Otherwise, it is very unlikely that you have celiac.

The + and - symbols said that if you have a positive result in this and a positive result in that, then...it's very likely, unlikely, etc. For actual normal ranges, the Antigliadin IgA is less than 18 (you're 6) and for the Antigliadin IgG, it's less than 24 (you're 15). You tested negative in both. So, if you look at the color-coded thing I had in an above post, you'd see that a positive EMA IgA would mean that you're probably celiac...if the EMA was negative, it's extremely unlikely that you have celiac disease.

Oh, Kaiti was right. They do come in numbers, not as positive or negative. The only test that comes back as + or - is the EMA IgA

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Yeah the one says positive or negative right on the results but the others come in numbers. celiac3270 is right it is very unlikely if EMA came back negative along with your other ones then you probably do not have it. One thing about just the IgA anti-gliadan is that many celiacs can be IgA deficient so you should get the EMA done and other tests done specifically for celiac :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    2. - Ginger38 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    3. - Russ H commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      5

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    4. - Russ H posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      Coeliac UK Research Conference 2025

    5. - Rejoicephd replied to Rejoicephd's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Basic metabolic panel results - more flags


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,376
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Citydweller
    Newest Member
    Citydweller
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
    • Ginger38
      I’m 43, just newly diagnosed with a horrible case of shingles last week . They are all over my face , around my eye, ear , all in my scalp. Lymph nodes are a mess. Ear is a mess. My eye is hurting and sensitive. Pain has been a 10/10+ daily. Taking Motrin and Tylenol around the clock. I AM MISERABLE. The pain is unrelenting. I just want to cry.   But Developing shingles has me a bit concerned about my immune system which also has me wondering about celiac and if there’s a connection to celiac / gluten and shingles; particularly since I haven't been 💯 gluten free because of all the confusing test results and doctors advice etc., is there a connection here? I’ve never had shingles and the gluten/ celiac  roller coaster has been ongoing for a while but I’ve had gluten off and on the last year bc of all the confusion  
    • Russ H
      There were some interesting talks, particularly Prof Ludvig Stollid's talk on therapeutics for coeliac disease.    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRcl2mPE0WdigRtJPvylUJbkCx263KF_t
    • Rejoicephd
      Thank you @trents for letting me know you experience something similar thanks @knitty kitty for your response and resources.  I will be following up with my doctor about these results and I’ll read the articles you sent. Thanks - I really appreciate you all.
    • knitty kitty
      You're right, doctors usually only test Vitamin D and B12.  Both are really important, but they're not good indicators of deficiencies in the other B vitamins.  Our bodies are able to store Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in the liver for up to a year or longer.  The other B vitamins can only be stored for much shorter periods of time.  Pyridoxine B 6 can be stored for several months, but the others only a month or two at the longest.  Thiamine stores can be depleted in as little as three days.  There's no correlation between B12 levels and the other B vitamins' levels.  Blood tests can't measure the amount of vitamins stored inside cells where they are used.  There's disagreement as to what optimal vitamin levels are.  The Recommended Daily Allowance is based on the minimum daily amount needed to prevent disease set back in the forties when people ate a totally different diet and gruesome experiments were done on people.  Folate  requirements had to be updated in the nineties after spina bifida increased and synthetic folic acid was mandated to be added to grain products.  Vitamin D requirements have been updated only in the past few years.   Doctors aren't required to take as many hours of nutritional education as in the past.  They're educated in learning institutions funded by pharmaceutical corporations.  Natural substances like vitamins can't be patented, so there's more money to be made prescribing pharmaceuticals than vitamins.   Also, look into the Autoimmune Protocol Diet, developed by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, a Celiac herself.  Her book The Paleo Approach has been most helpful to me.  You're very welcome.  I'm glad I can help you around some stumbling blocks while on this journey.    Keep me posted on your progress!  Best wishes! P.S.  interesting reading: Thiamine, gastrointestinal beriberi and acetylcholine signaling https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12014454/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.