Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Iga


Sharon C.

Recommended Posts

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

My son was diagnosed last Septmeber with Celiac Disease. Since I also have issues with food, I am trying to determine whether I may also have a gluten intolerance.

I discussed it with my doctor who seemed to not have a lot of knowledge about the subject. I asked for the gluten IgA antibody test. The nurses in the office never had to write up that blood test before and they called the lab directly and asked what test it was and filled out a slip for me to take to them.

I had the test done and am waiting for results. My problem is, I have very little confidence that anyone knows what they are doing. I wonder if they did the right test, and I wonder if my doctor will understand the results. I called up and wanted the nurse to give me the antibody level over the phone, but she said she can't. The doctor would let me know if anything was "wrong" when he calls later.

Is there an exact name for the blood test I need? And can anyone tell me the proper number that I, an an adult female, should be over or under to consider myself either tolerant or intolerant? Thanks. I think it shouldn't be over 30, but I'm not sure. If it shows that I am intolerant, I am just going to go gluten free regardless. So I don't know if I need to go ahead with an endoscopy. I won't be eating it anymore anyway.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiac3270 Collaborator

If it's the EMA IgA, it will only read positive or negative (with no numbers). They probably ran the Antigliadin IgA. For that test, normal levels are less than 18. For the tTG IgA, normal levels are less than 13, but I suspect it'll be the antigliadin :)

Now, one positive test isn't enough to diagnose you completely or completely dismiss celiac. It's helpful also to do the Antigliadin IgG.

This table explains whether you should suspect celiac disease or not, based on which tests are positive or negative.

EMA IgA/AGA IgA/AGA IgG/Interpretation

+ + + celiac disease 99% Probable

+ - + celiac disease probable

+ + - celiac disease probable

+ - - celiac disease probable

- + + celiac disease less likely

- - + celiac disease less likely

- + - celiac disease less likely

- - - celiac disease very unlikely

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

Well, I have my results, only, they are not plus's or minus's like the chart above.

My IGA is 6, my IGG is 15. What does that sound like?

My doctor will not likely run any further tests because in his opinion, these blood tests are negative. If I do the entero lab, do I need to eat large amounts of gluten first, or can I take it anytime? Thanks.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

The results don't come in plus and minus' like above. He was using that to interpret the resulsts. The + means a positive and the - means negative and then they are color coded with IgA, IgG, etc. To me the levels don't seem high.. I think they are in the normal range but I am not sure about that one. Did they test you for tTG? There are certain tests that are more specific for celiac then others.

celiac3270 Collaborator

Both are within normal range. Did he do an EMA IgA or just the antigliadin. If the EMA came back positive (it only comes back pos. or neg.), then celiac disease is probable. Otherwise, it is very unlikely that you have celiac.

The + and - symbols said that if you have a positive result in this and a positive result in that, then...it's very likely, unlikely, etc. For actual normal ranges, the Antigliadin IgA is less than 18 (you're 6) and for the Antigliadin IgG, it's less than 24 (you're 15). You tested negative in both. So, if you look at the color-coded thing I had in an above post, you'd see that a positive EMA IgA would mean that you're probably celiac...if the EMA was negative, it's extremely unlikely that you have celiac disease.

Oh, Kaiti was right. They do come in numbers, not as positive or negative. The only test that comes back as + or - is the EMA IgA

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Yeah the one says positive or negative right on the results but the others come in numbers. celiac3270 is right it is very unlikely if EMA came back negative along with your other ones then you probably do not have it. One thing about just the IgA anti-gliadan is that many celiacs can be IgA deficient so you should get the EMA done and other tests done specifically for celiac :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.