Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With Understanding Blood Test


heartofgold

Recommended Posts

heartofgold Rookie

I am in ontario canada so i am not sure how to read these tests meaning i have seen some blood tests posted but I could not compare anything cause the labs may post differently here. LIke you said maybe someone can help me on it here .

Gliadin AB IgG 36 H (which is high i am sure ) then it says 20 KEU/L CMH

Gliadin Ab IgA 21 H 20 KEU/L CMH

tTransglut IgA 45 H 20 KEU?L CMH

Interpretation Positive findings of IgA Endomystal antibodies (IgA Transglutaminese) are essentially diagnostic of Celiac Disease or Dermatitis Herpatiformis. The IgA Endomystal antibodies should disappear with a strict adherence to a gluten free diet and can be used to monitor adherence to diet.

*** i know i dont have the D.H. skin disease.

Again i hope someone can interrupt this as it is a canadian hospital that did them.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Those are postive blood tests.

Most likely they are read thus

Tests run- Your result- High or Low - Top of normal range

Gliadin AB IgG -36 -H -20 KEU/L CMH

Gliadin Ab IgA -21 -H - 20 KEU/L CMH

tTransglut IgA -45 -H -20 KEU?L CMH

kaiess Contributor

I'm not one to give advice yet, b/c we're right there with you on this one, but I do remember our gastro telling us that normal TTG is under 20 and my son had a first reading of 95 and a second reading of 145 (6 months after the first). We are in BC so I assume they have the same tests as Ont. My son was scoped after the first reading of 95 and it was negative. Even after the 145 reading they still would not diagnose him with Celiac. Instead we have just done a 3rd reading (12 months after the first) and I am awaiting results. They said if it is over 200 then that is a definite Celiac diagnosis, but again they will want to diagnose with a scope/biopsy.

Not sure if I'm any help as far as your testing.

Kathy

mamaw Community Regular

I agree with Ravenwoodglass... you should be gluten free

heartofgold Rookie

Those are postive blood tests.

Most likely they are read thus

Tests run- Your result- High or Low - Top of normal range

Gliadin AB IgG -36 -H -20 KEU/L CMH

Gliadin Ab IgA -21 -H - 20 KEU/L CMH

tTransglut IgA -45 -H -20 KEU?L CMH

[/quote

hi Raven. do you mean that the highest normal in general is -20 so thus the -35 and -45 are fairly high showing celiac disease in my blood tests . thanks again.

heartofgold Rookie
I'm not one to give advice yet, b/c we're right there with you on this one, but I do remember our gastro telling us that normal TTG is under 20 and my son had a first reading of 95 and a second reading of 145 (6 months after the first). We are in BC so I assume they have the same tests as Ont. My son was scoped after the first reading of 95 and it was negative. Even after the 145 reading they still would not diagnose him with Celiac. Instead we have just done a 3rd reading (12 months after the first) and I am awaiting results. They said if it is over 200 then that is a definite Celiac diagnosis, but again they will want to diagnose with a scope/biopsy.

Not sure if I'm any help as far as your testing.

Kathy

hi kathy.... i read a posting a doctor had online about the fact we have 22 feet of small intestines so when they do biopsy they might not hit right on the gluten effected area. so we could in essence be biopsied over and over . the blood tests are suppose to be 90% right so i think if our numbers are up we do have problems with gluten thus gluten free diet. i did not want to go back for a second biopsy right now so i went gluten free. hope i am doing it as well as i can though as i am so new at it last 3 weeks. thanks for helping me with the blood test results.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
hi Raven. do you mean that the highest normal in general is -20 so thus the -35 and -45 are fairly high showing celiac disease in my blood tests . thanks again.

Yes, that's correct.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,210
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BJ OConnor
    Newest Member
    BJ OConnor
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.