Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With Understanding Blood Test


heartofgold

Recommended Posts

heartofgold Rookie

I am in ontario canada so i am not sure how to read these tests meaning i have seen some blood tests posted but I could not compare anything cause the labs may post differently here. LIke you said maybe someone can help me on it here .

Gliadin AB IgG 36 H (which is high i am sure ) then it says 20 KEU/L CMH

Gliadin Ab IgA 21 H 20 KEU/L CMH

tTransglut IgA 45 H 20 KEU?L CMH

Interpretation Positive findings of IgA Endomystal antibodies (IgA Transglutaminese) are essentially diagnostic of Celiac Disease or Dermatitis Herpatiformis. The IgA Endomystal antibodies should disappear with a strict adherence to a gluten free diet and can be used to monitor adherence to diet.

*** i know i dont have the D.H. skin disease.

Again i hope someone can interrupt this as it is a canadian hospital that did them.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Those are postive blood tests.

Most likely they are read thus

Tests run- Your result- High or Low - Top of normal range

Gliadin AB IgG -36 -H -20 KEU/L CMH

Gliadin Ab IgA -21 -H - 20 KEU/L CMH

tTransglut IgA -45 -H -20 KEU?L CMH

kaiess Contributor

I'm not one to give advice yet, b/c we're right there with you on this one, but I do remember our gastro telling us that normal TTG is under 20 and my son had a first reading of 95 and a second reading of 145 (6 months after the first). We are in BC so I assume they have the same tests as Ont. My son was scoped after the first reading of 95 and it was negative. Even after the 145 reading they still would not diagnose him with Celiac. Instead we have just done a 3rd reading (12 months after the first) and I am awaiting results. They said if it is over 200 then that is a definite Celiac diagnosis, but again they will want to diagnose with a scope/biopsy.

Not sure if I'm any help as far as your testing.

Kathy

mamaw Community Regular

I agree with Ravenwoodglass... you should be gluten free

heartofgold Rookie

Those are postive blood tests.

Most likely they are read thus

Tests run- Your result- High or Low - Top of normal range

Gliadin AB IgG -36 -H -20 KEU/L CMH

Gliadin Ab IgA -21 -H - 20 KEU/L CMH

tTransglut IgA -45 -H -20 KEU?L CMH

[/quote

hi Raven. do you mean that the highest normal in general is -20 so thus the -35 and -45 are fairly high showing celiac disease in my blood tests . thanks again.

heartofgold Rookie
I'm not one to give advice yet, b/c we're right there with you on this one, but I do remember our gastro telling us that normal TTG is under 20 and my son had a first reading of 95 and a second reading of 145 (6 months after the first). We are in BC so I assume they have the same tests as Ont. My son was scoped after the first reading of 95 and it was negative. Even after the 145 reading they still would not diagnose him with Celiac. Instead we have just done a 3rd reading (12 months after the first) and I am awaiting results. They said if it is over 200 then that is a definite Celiac diagnosis, but again they will want to diagnose with a scope/biopsy.

Not sure if I'm any help as far as your testing.

Kathy

hi kathy.... i read a posting a doctor had online about the fact we have 22 feet of small intestines so when they do biopsy they might not hit right on the gluten effected area. so we could in essence be biopsied over and over . the blood tests are suppose to be 90% right so i think if our numbers are up we do have problems with gluten thus gluten free diet. i did not want to go back for a second biopsy right now so i went gluten free. hope i am doing it as well as i can though as i am so new at it last 3 weeks. thanks for helping me with the blood test results.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
hi Raven. do you mean that the highest normal in general is -20 so thus the -35 and -45 are fairly high showing celiac disease in my blood tests . thanks again.

Yes, that's correct.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,601
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dale S
    Newest Member
    Dale S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.