Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Could Sensitivity Be Directly Related To Diet Compliance?


Mike M

Recommended Posts

Mike M Rookie

Having personally dealt/coped with Celiac for some time now and the more I learn, I am starting to make observations that may have some merit in my opinion (or maybe not!). So, I have a question(s). Could it be that those that appear to not be so sensitive to smaller amounts of gluten exposure, may have "desensitized" there immune system by consuming small amounts of gluten on a somewhat regular basis? Now I am not talking about eating gluten on purpose here. Casual gluten exposure is what I am saying through minor cross contamination or just eating products produced in a mixed facility ect. Could this be why there seems to be such a reaction gap in those that are ultra sensitive vs. those that seem to not react? These immune systems possibly can cope with small amounts of gluten without such a bad reaction? I don't know, hoping to hear other views.

P.S. I do have some other observations I would like to discuss. I would like to discuss these things in a positive way. Thanks and all the best, Mike


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



YoloGx Rookie

While I do agree that may be part of it for some folks, I think that for others they just haven't had celiac that long thus they react less... It is an interesting question no matter what however. I know for myself I am sensitive to a lot more than gluten, so I am on the ultra sensitive side it appears. No fun but that's the way it goes. And from what I am learning, everyone is affected by their diet to some extent or other, "normals" included. The standard American fair according to Dr. Mark Hyman (Ultra Mind Solution etc.) is making most everyone either sick, crazy or crotchety!

Bea

Sailing Girl Apprentice

I, too, have wondered about this.

When I first went gluten-free (because I was nursing and my daughter needed to be gluten-free), it was really just major-sources-of-wheat-free -- I was living in a mixed home, still drinking *beer* and eating foods with soy sauce on occasion, using the same non-stick pans, etc., as the gluten eater living there. I didn't know any better. But I felt better than I had in my entire adult life -- all sorts of nagging little health problems went away.

Then (once DD weaned) I added back some very limited bread sources -- and my health started to decline again. I was still incredibly gluten-light, but I started to have major neuro symptoms and horrible gastro symptoms. Eventually those led me to this site, and I realized the need to be completely, utterly gluten-free.

I don't have a gold standard Celiac diagnosis, but I do have a significant amount of medical expertise, and based on my medical history (and my daughter's), there's little doubt I'm Celiac. I'll never get the gold standard diagnosis unless they develop a test for it that doesn't involve a gluten challenge.

I've spent the last 19 months methodically (some of my friends would say neurotically) eliminating gluten sources from my diet. And while my health is now back to superb, I've become dramatically more sensitive, and I react to products made on shared lines and many labeled "gluten-free." I also react to grain-based alcohols and vinegars.

So I do think our bodies react more noticeably to minute gluten once we're almost 100%. But it's also possible that we were reacting all along to those microscopic amounts of gluten -- and we just didn't notice because our antibodies always were activated anyway with the larger quantities of gluten we were consuming.

Mike M Rookie
I, too, have wondered about this.

When I first went gluten-free (because I was nursing and my daughter needed to be gluten-free), it was really just major-sources-of-wheat-free -- I was living in a mixed home, still drinking *beer* and eating foods with soy sauce on occasion, using the same non-stick pans, etc., as the gluten eater living there. I didn't know any better. But I felt better than I had in my entire adult life -- all sorts of nagging little health problems went away.

Then (once DD weaned) I added back some very limited bread sources -- and my health started to decline again. I was still incredibly gluten-light, but I started to have major neuro symptoms and horrible gastro symptoms. Eventually those led me to this site, and I realized the need to be completely, utterly gluten-free.

I don't have a gold standard Celiac diagnosis, but I do have a significant amount of medical expertise, and based on my medical history (and my daughter's), there's little doubt I'm Celiac. I'll never get the gold standard diagnosis unless they develop a test for it that doesn't involve a gluten challenge.

I've spent the last 19 months methodically (some of my friends would say neurotically) eliminating gluten sources from my diet. And while my health is now back to superb, I've become dramatically more sensitive, and I react to products made on shared lines and many labeled "gluten-free." I also react to grain-based alcohols and vinegars.

So I do think our bodies react more noticeably to minute gluten once we're almost 100%. But it's also possible that we were reacting all along to those microscopic amounts of gluten -- and we just didn't notice because our antibodies always were activated anyway with the larger quantities of gluten we were consuming.

Thanks for the responses. Your post brings up another observation that seems plausible to me.....I read over and over about these possible "triggers" that may cause full blown celiac to "kick in" so to speak. I have read that it was a surgery or a severe auto accident or a serious stomach virus that some folks seem to be able to relate getting this disease too. They all seem to possibly have a common link in my opinion. Could it be the lack of eating for a sustained period of time that allows our bodies to have a break from gluten and give it time to build up more and more antibodies? Could it be that our immune system was so run down that it could not mount up a defense and was running on almost empty with regards to antibodies? When enough antibodies are present, is this enough to finally have the gut damage? I don't know, just asking out loud. In my opinion, those of us with celiac now, may have been born with this disease and it just may be a matter of our bodies performing an antibody balancing act until it tips all the way to full blown celiac (villi damage)? Lots of questions! All the best, Mike

Tallforagirl Rookie
In my opinion, those of us with celiac now, may have been born with this disease and it just may be a matter of our bodies performing an antibody balancing act until it tips all the way to full blown celiac (villi damage)? Lots of questions! All the best, Mike

A study done here in Australia found no relationship between severity of symptoms and severity of gut damage: Open Original Shared Link

Just reading this board I am often suprised to note that often those with the strongest symptoms are negative for antibodies when blood-tested, whereas many who are asymptomatic or with very mild symptoms have very positive test results (myself included).

It would be really interesting if researchers could find out why some are so much more sensitive than others. My personal theory is that some celiacs get an allergic reaction to gluten alongside the celiac disease.

YoloGx Rookie
My personal theory is that some celiacs get an allergic reaction to gluten alongside the celiac disease.

Antihistimines do not help with this however so I wouldn't call it a strict allergic reaction. However it could be a "sensitivity" reaction. Chicken or egg question of course. I have found nevertheless that taking baking soda and apple cider vinegar as well as the usual remedies of probiotics and digestive enzymes really does help so there may be some truth to the "sensitivity reaction" part.

As for me, I have noticed that whereas last year when I first went off all trace gluten I easily got D etc., but then it was usually over with unless I stressed myself out. Now however if I get a good dose of CC, I get headaches, can't sleep, my nerves get shot and my body gets generalized inflammation and body aches. Plus its way easier for me to get congested. This often then will hang on three to four weeks. Major bummer.

I have thus decided not to date for the time being until I improve a lot more since dating seems to be the major way I get CC'd these days. I also have decided to make myself in charge of family parties so I prepare all the food to get around those CC problems... Fortunately I am a pretty good cook so my plan thus far is working out... Now instead of my family focusing on their collective opinion that I am an over sensitive nut case they are instead appreciating what a good dinner I made for them etc. etc.

Bea

tom Contributor

The thread title is "Could Sensitivity Be Directly Related To Diet Compliance?" w/ the post revealing the theory that the sensitivity could be a result of the strict compliance.

Isn't it the other way around?

Doesn't the high sensitivity preclude & prompt the strict compliance?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient
The thread title is "Could Sensitivity Be Directly Related To Diet Compliance?" w/ the post revealing the theory that the sensitivity could be a result of the strict compliance.

Isn't it the other way around?

Doesn't the high sensitivity preclude & prompt the strict compliance?

You could be right. When we first start out we don't know how sensitive we are. I for one was deathly afraid of eating out because of fears of cc. Even now, I can probably count on my fingers (without using toes) the number of times in 16 months I have eaten in restaurants. But I am getting bolder, because I can honestly say that I have never suffered cc from eating out--mind you, I am pretty careful of where I go and what I order. I can pretty much say that the only times I have been caught out with gluten is with medications (I know, my bad for not always being thorough in checking).

So I count myself lucky as not being one of the supersensitive. And yet, with diagnosis (self) at 67, I had consumed gluten for longer than most.

I am pretty sure that my head-on auto accident was my trigger because my symptoms increased big-time after that. That was when I became lactose intolerant. But then again, I had a mycoplasma infection which had major impact on my body at about that time too.

Besides, when I do get glutened the symptoms don't last very long for me, and are not as severe (except when I keep on taking the med or supplement-=duh!! you would think I would wake up sooner.

So while I am very diet compliant, I have no troubles in restaurants or bakery departments of supermarkets, or other places that send some forum members up the wall. And yet I have two other auto-immune celiac-related diseases which are not going away.

So I don't have any answers.

MollyBeth Contributor
Just reading this board I am often suprised to note that often those with the strongest symptoms are negative for antibodies when blood-tested, whereas many who are asymptomatic or with very mild symptoms have very positive test results (myself included).

I seem to be one of the people that is not very sensitive. But before I went gluten free I was sick all the time and am still trying to get all my blood levels up to where they should be. Like my iron and ferratin. My blood test though came back completely negative. When I had my endoscopy though the doc said my villa were completely flattened in the biopsies he took.

I find this entire world of auto-immune very confusing. Everyone's story is soo different. Some people get skinny....I gained a bunch of weight because I was taking in so many calories everyday...even with all my malabsorption problems I still gained weight. Everyone's story is very different.

The thread title is "Could Sensitivity Be Directly Related To Diet Compliance?" w/ the post revealing the theory that the sensitivity could be a result of the strict compliance.

Isn't it the other way around?

Doesn't the high sensitivity preclude & prompt the strict compliance?

haha I'm sorry I just had to laugh at this!! So which came first??? The chicken or the egg??

Jestgar Rising Star
Everyone's story is soo different.

I think this is the key.

I get almost no CC. I don't eat processed foods and I rarely eat out. When I accidentally to get CCd I know within minutes, however, my reactions are very mild and only last an hour or so.

I think your immune system dictates whether it will have a store of cells primed and ready to spit out antibodies, or whether it will clear out those rarely used cells and only give a small response to gluten.

jerseyangel Proficient
Doesn't the high sensitivity preclude & prompt the strict compliance?

It did for me.

I think your immune system dictates whether it will have a store of cells primed and ready to spit out antibodies, or whether it will clear out those rarely used cells and only give a small response to gluten.

I never thought of it that way--so that could explain the wide variation in symptoms from person to person. If that's the case, there's probably not a lot we can do to change it--just be ultra careful about the things that cause reactions in the first place?

Mike M Rookie
The thread title is "Could Sensitivity Be Directly Related To Diet Compliance?" w/ the post revealing the theory that the sensitivity could be a result of the strict compliance.

Isn't it the other way around?

Doesn't the high sensitivity preclude & prompt the strict compliance?

Well, it could very well be the other way around. I have also been thinking that perhaps some celiacs may produce a protective mucous coating that lines the intestines because of the gluten being an irritant and they just don't absorb well because of this. Maybe this is why some have no symptoms and yet have severe malabsorption issues and also perhaps have a negative biopsy? Maybe over time if this mucous idea is true, after a while the body doesn't produce this any longer and then we get the villa damage? Again, don't know! Not sure where I am going with this.....Seems interesting though. Mike

Tallforagirl Rookie
I think this is the key.

I get almost no CC. I don't eat processed foods and I rarely eat out. When I accidentally to get CCd I know within minutes, however, my reactions are very mild and only last an hour or so.

I think your immune system dictates whether it will have a store of cells primed and ready to spit out antibodies, or whether it will clear out those rarely used cells and only give a small response to gluten.

I think it's important to differentiate between your immune system response and your nervous system response.

Some celiacs react very quickly and violently with D, gas etc to even trace amounts of gluten. Others have a less sensitive nervous system, so they are asymptomatic even when ingesting large amounts of gluten. For both types of people, an autoimmune response is still taking place. I won't say that the same amount of gut damage happens in both types, because I think it's a very individual thing, but I would say that a strong reaction does not equal more gut damage.

It's definitely something that needs more research, but at the end of the day, all of us need to strive for as close a possible to 100 per cent gluten-free diet, regardless of "sensitivity".

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,677
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nancy Magil
    Newest Member
    Nancy Magil
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.