Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Entero Labs


JamMama

Recommended Posts

JamMama Newbie

I have been diagnosed with IbS for many years, and recently began having symptoms of dairy and gluten intolerance. I'm much better now that I have eliminated them from my diet. I find the Entero Labs views of stool testing vs. blood testing very interesting. Are they really more accurate? And worth the money for a full panel - al most $400?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



leadmeastray88 Contributor
I have been diagnosed with IbS for many years, and recently began having symptoms of dairy and gluten intolerance. I'm much better now that I have eliminated them from my diet. I find the Entero Labs views of stool testing vs. blood testing very interesting. Are they really more accurate? And worth the money for a full panel - al most $400?

Hi there :)

If you look in Yellowlilax's thread on "Enterolab results" I answered your question there.

gfb1 Rookie
I find the Entero Labs views of stool testing vs. blood testing very interesting. Are they really more accurate? And worth the money for a full panel - al most $400?

interesting doesn't mean reliable or accurate.

in case you don't feel like searching here was part of lma88's answer. its worth repeating.

I would only recommend Enterolab testing if you've already had other testing done - for example:

1) The Celiac bloodwork panel, which includes:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

2) An endoscopy with biopsy

Reason being, Enterolab's testing methods have not yet been approved/acknowledged by the current medical community. They claim to be able to detect active dietary gluten sensitivity in the stool, but NOT diagnose Celiac Disease.

  • 7 months later...
mogal Newbie

I am new to this board and to gluten-free life.

I am curious...I used Enterolabs for the

Gluten Sensitivity Stool Test: Antigliadin IgA (CPT 83520)

My results came back with a 33. So, I've been gluten-free since January lst.

I didn't do the panel of other Celiac tests with enterolabs as I don't have health insurance.

The doctor that did my colonoscopy referred me to enterolabs, stating that based on my weight loss (14# in one year) and loose stools for over a decade that I was probably gluten intolerant. But based on what I have read here that Enterolabs results are not standardized and/or reputable by medical professionals???

So, I am wondering if I should have some of the blood work done that is recommended in this post to confirm that I am indeed gluten intolerant...and where is a good place to get those blood tests done?

I am having some chronic pain/muscle aches since I've gone gluten-free...I have never had this type of pain before and so am wondering if this is "withdrawls" or what?

So, I'm thinking that if this pain continues that I may go back to gluten as this pain is no fun and I felt GREAT before I went gluten-free and my only symptoms were the weight loss primarily.

Any help or ideas is appreciated.

thanks!

sandsurfgirl Collaborator

I am new to this board and to gluten-free life.

I am curious...I used Enterolabs for the

Gluten Sensitivity Stool Test: Antigliadin IgA (CPT 83520)

My results came back with a 33. So, I've been gluten-free since January lst.

I didn't do the panel of other Celiac tests with enterolabs as I don't have health insurance.

The doctor that did my colonoscopy referred me to enterolabs, stating that based on my weight loss (14# in one year) and loose stools for over a decade that I was probably gluten intolerant. But based on what I have read here that Enterolabs results are not standardized and/or reputable by medical professionals???

So, I am wondering if I should have some of the blood work done that is recommended in this post to confirm that I am indeed gluten intolerant...and where is a good place to get those blood tests done?

I am having some chronic pain/muscle aches since I've gone gluten-free...I have never had this type of pain before and so am wondering if this is "withdrawls" or what?

So, I'm thinking that if this pain continues that I may go back to gluten as this pain is no fun and I felt GREAT before I went gluten-free and my only symptoms were the weight loss primarily.

Any help or ideas is appreciated.

thanks!

I'm curious to know what kind of doctor referred you because I haven't heard of any MD's using Enterolab. If he did the colonoscopy then I'm' assuming it's a GI doc? That is interesting and makes me wonder if Enterolab will be getting more acclaim in the future.

The problem for you is that the gluten free diet will negate the results of the blood test and the biopsy. You will have to be eating gluten for a month or longer to make those tests worth doing and even then they aren't 100% accurate.

I think it's weird that you felt great on gluten and feel bad off of it. Now with diarrhea you can have electrolyte imbalances that can cause pain. I was getting dizzy spells really badly and somebody on here saved me by recommending I get Gatorade or something that replaces electrolytes. After one bottle the dizzy spells improved and after 2 days of drinking it, they are all gone. Maybe you can try that?

mogal Newbie

I'm curious to know what kind of doctor referred you because I haven't heard of any MD's using Enterolab. If he did the colonoscopy then I'm' assuming it's a GI doc? That is interesting and makes me wonder if Enterolab will be getting more acclaim in the future.

The problem for you is that the gluten free diet will negate the results of the blood test and the biopsy. You will have to be eating gluten for a month or longer to make those tests worth doing and even then they aren't 100% accurate.

I think it's weird that you felt great on gluten and feel bad off of it. Now with diarrhea you can have electrolyte imbalances that can cause pain. I was getting dizzy spells really badly and somebody on here saved me by recommending I get Gatorade or something that replaces electrolytes. After one bottle the dizzy spells improved and after 2 days of drinking it, they are all gone. Maybe you can try that?

mogal Newbie

Yes, he was a GI physician here in KC that recommended me to enterolab, plus my acupunturist ref'd them as well.

Being new to this gluten-free world, I am learning alot, but wondering which test(s) is conclusive? I may go back to gluten if the pain/aches continue...but will give it a good 3month trial. I could do the blood tests then perhaps.

Besides the aches, I have yet to gain any weight either...with malabsorption/weigh loss being the primary reason/concern for going gluten-free.

I will try the electrolytes...thanks for that tip.

Also,


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Edo Rookie

interesting doesn't mean reliable or accurate.

in case you don't feel like searching here was part of lma88's answer. its worth repeating.

I would only recommend Enterolab testing if you've already had other testing done - for example:

1) The Celiac bloodwork panel, which includes:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

2) An endoscopy with biopsy

Reason being, Enterolab's testing methods have not yet been approved/acknowledged by the current medical community. They claim to be able to detect active dietary gluten sensitivity in the stool, but NOT diagnose Celiac Disease.

Just to throw in my two cents here. I'm relatively new to all this celiac business (about a month's worth of research) so I'm no expert, but this is how I understand it from everything I've researched. I've also had Enterolab testing.

Yes, it's true that Enterolab's testing methods haven't been submitted for peer review yet and thus haven't been accepted like the "official" tests your doctor would give you (the bloodwork panel and endoscopy). And no, Enterolab can't diagnose celiac disease, only gluten-sensitivity. Which is because, as I understand it, the only way to get an official diagnosis of celiac is from the endoscopy biopsy showing that intestinal villi have been destroyed. Isn't it only celiac if the villi are destroyed? Otherwise they call it gluten-sensitivity, right? So of course it isn't possible for Enterolab to diagnose celiac, because they use a stool sample for the test. They can't see your villi from a stool sample. But they can see gluten antibodies if present, which wouldn't be present unless gluten was recognized as a foreign substance by the immune system.

Yes, it's not the official diagnostic test. But just because Enterolab isn't proven to the medical community yet, that doesn't mean we should immediately dismiss it as unreliable or inaccurate. From my own research, the science behind it, although new, seems pretty solid and logical so I decided to trust it. No one can guarantee for certain that Enterolab results are trustworthy yet, but then again, we do know for certain that bloodwork and endoscopy results are frequently untrustworthy. Many people have gotten false negatives on those tests.

I understand the viewpoint that, if one has health insurance, there's nothing wrong with having the bloodwork and endoscopy testing done before resorting to Enterolab. If those tests come back positive, there's no need for any more testing. But it's also a matter of personal preference. For some, the official diagnosis is important to them. Then again, some may not care about an "official" celiac diagnosis, but just want something on paper telling them gluten is the problem. Then, some may trust both tests but really dislike the idea of getting an endoscopy and all that, and prefer the simplicity of the stool sample. Maybe some don't trust any of the tests. Some will tell you that feeling better after going gluten-free is enough of a diagnosis for them and they're happy to forgo the testing completely. It's a personal decision.

I decided to go for Enterolab personally because I don't have health insurance, but I wanted some results on paper. I also wanted to go gluten-free right away, which isn't a problem for Enterolab testing as it is for doctor testing. I was in a lot of pain and didn't want to go through the wait of acquiring insurance, setting up appointments, and having to stay on gluten until the tests were over. Especially if those tests had a good chance of giving me false negatives; then it would be a lot of time, expense, and pain for nothing. I wouldn't have trusted any test results to be accurate unless they were positive (as I understand it, there aren't really any false positives in these tests, only false negatives).

I trusted that Enterolab was more sensitive and had far less chance of false negatives. And though I have heard some claims that Enterolab results are "never negative" and thus it "must be some kind of scam," I agree with the replies to those accusations, which are that most people who are willing to pay for a nearly $400 test are already pretty certain they have a problem with gluten and just want some science to back them up on it. Plus, it's been pointed out that people have indeed gotten negative Enterolab results before. There are even posts here by people sharing their negative results, and I've read them to be certain.

So, after a lot of research and thinking, I decided to get tested through Enterolab and go gluten-free immediately (I was already feeling much better by the time my results came in).

My suggestion to anyone in the pre-diagnosis position would be to do a lot of research and form your own educated opinion. Then do what you feel comfortable with. If you go for a test you don't trust, the results will be worthless to you anyway. In the end, my most trusted diagnosis was that I felt much better after going gluten-free, but I like having the "on-paper" results to back that up. So I don't regret what I personally decided to do. It's important to do what you think is right for you, and don't let anyone decide that for you.

bluebonnet Explorer

after my "at best okay" (doctor qoute) bloodwork i decided to look into enterolab as a backup. i got the $400 testing because i wanted the genetic portion too. after i received my results i spoke with a couple of different people at enterolab and they explained everything in detail. i was/am very glad i decided to use them. its been almost 1 month since doing gluten free (with a couple of accidentals) and i see my doctor this morning for rest of labs/tests. i plan on bringing him a copy of my results for my file. (i did test positive via iga and genetics). i will not do the endoscopy because i feel like with my gluten free response and my paperwork from enterolab that i have enough to consider myself validated in the eyes of the medical field. my friend works at quest labs and she says there are inconsistencies and false tests all the time. it absolutely helps to get a second opinion from another source especially when you are sick with no answers.

best wishes! :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    2. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    3. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    4. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    5. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.