Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood, Possibly Negative Biopsy


Lisa79

Recommended Posts

Lisa79 Enthusiast

Well DD had her biopsy today, she said it actually looked very good, we don't have the biopsy results yet so it not negative, but this got me thinking what if it is negative, why would you have positive Antibodies if you didn't have celiac??

I am sure this has been mentioned many times but any replies would be great.

I am sure we will decide to keep DD gluten free even if the biopsy does come back negative.

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

There can be many reasons for a false negative on the endoscopy. We have 22 ft of small intestine and the damage can be patchy and there are changes that precede the full villi destruction that some doctors are not aware of to name just a couple. I am glad to see that you are going to put her on the diet no matter what the results of the biopsy are. You can start today and you may have the answer by her symptom resolution before you even go to the return appointment for the biopsy results.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

As Ravenwoodglass said, the damage to the intestines might not have yet reached detectable levels. A less likely possibility is a false positive on the blood tests but some other autoimmune diseases could cause that.

It might be sematics but one concern is that you said "keep" her gluten free which sounds like she might already be on a gluten free diet which could distort the test results.

oceangirl Collaborator

I had positive antibodies and a negative biopsy (however, I had been glutenfree/lite for 4 months prior to biopsy) There is NO Question that gluten causes damage to me and genetic testing furthered that proof for me. I think they will understand in the future that there is a spectrum of disease caused by gluten. By the way, the Mayo clinic just completed a comprehensive study using antibodies (I think only) to determine the incidence of celiac disease in this country and they found its incidence has quadrupled since earlier numbers. (This story was on MSNBC; maybe you can still find it.)

Good luck,

lisa

JennyC Enthusiast

Please don't let the doctor convince you that she does not have celiac disease if her biopsy is considered negative. There is a medically accepted term called latent celiac disease. Latent celiac disease takes place when there is positive serology and symptoms but a negative biopsy. The thought is that celiac disease is present, but not enough damage has been done YET to produce villus atrophy. Celiac symptoms and a positive IgA tTG are very diagnostic of celiac.

Lisa79 Enthusiast

Sorry my mistake, I should have said put her on Gluten free, not keep her on gluten-free, she has been eating gluten prior to the biopsy.

My husband wants to wait for the results, but I would like her to go gluten-free straight away.

I had a negative biopsy years ago, but then saying that, testing has improved since then, but if only I had gone gluten free back then I might not have had all the issues I have had leading up to finally getting a positive biopsy. I had ovarian cysts removed, migraines, anxiety and a gallbladder removed, IBS, major constipation which may have lead to prolapse and then finally get diagnosed with celiac disease.

Thanks for the replies.

Roda Rising Star
Well DD had her biopsy today, she said it actually looked very good, we don't have the biopsy results yet so it not negative, but this got me thinking what if it is negative, why would you have positive Antibodies if you didn't have celiac??

I am sure this has been mentioned many times but any replies would be great.

I am sure we will decide to keep DD gluten free even if the biopsy does come back negative.

Thanks

My doctor said that my small bowel didn't look too bad only minor changes and he did not think the biopsy would be positive. Well when they called with the results it was positive. So they really can't tell by visually looking at it unless it is really bad. They need the histology for that. The biopsy can have its limitations, and with positve antibodies it is likley she has it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa79 Enthusiast

Thanks for the replies, guess we will just have to wait and see what the results say, but I will be discussing with the GI and DH putting her gluten-free even if the biopsy is neg. Interesting about the latent celiac disease.

Thanks

JennyC Enthusiast
Thanks for the replies, guess we will just have to wait and see what the results say, but I will be discussing with the GI and DH putting her gluten-free even if the biopsy is neg. Interesting about the latent celiac disease.

Thanks

Some doctors are really set in their ways. If the GI dismisses you because of a negative biopsy, please find a new doctor for your child. Sometimes we really have to push hard and advocate for our children.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - nanny marley replied to nanny marley's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Manitol and mri

    2. - Scott Adams replied to RDLiberty's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Toothpaste question.

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Theresa2407's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Probiotics

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Colleen H's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Celiac attack confusion and anxiety

    5. - Scott Adams replied to nanny marley's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Manitol and mri


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,789
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    klholt
    Newest Member
    klholt
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • nanny marley
      Brilliant thankyou for the information I will contact them tomorrow, I was just concerned because I'm already in a bowel flare too , and I didn't want to take anything that would cause me more issues , especially with the way sweeteners make be feel I've had a really bad throat from this type of stuff before , and it upsets my digestive system too and I have a wedding in a week 😳
    • Scott Adams
      There is no scientific evidence to suggest that hydrated silica or its relative, silicon dioxide, triggers a celiac-specific immune response or causes intestinal damage in individuals with the condition. The concern you likely encountered online is a common misconception. Here’s the key distinction: the protein in gluten (gliadin) is what causes the autoimmune reaction in celiac disease. Hydrated silica and silicon dioxide are minerals, chemically inert compounds of silicon and oxygen, and are completely unrelated to gluten proteins. They are widely used as abrasives in toothpaste and anti-caking agents in food powders because they are stable and non-reactive. While any individual can have a unique sensitivity to any substance, there is no mechanism by which these silica compounds would mimic gluten or exacerbate celiac disease. Your diligence in using a certified gluten-free toothpaste is the correct and most important step, as it eliminates the risk of cross-contamination with wheat-derived ingredients like starch. Based on current scientific understanding, the hydrated silica in your toothpaste is not an issue for your celiac management.
    • Scott Adams
      There is no single "best" probiotic brand universally recommended for celiac disease. The goal of a probiotic in this context is to help support the gut microbiome, which can be disrupted by the damage caused by gluten exposure. The most important factor is not the brand name, but ensuring the product is certified gluten-free, as some probiotics use wheat-derived starches or are produced in facilities that handle gluten, posing a cross-contamination risk. Furthermore, the specific strains of bacteria can matter; some research suggests strains like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may be beneficial, but individual responses vary greatly. Because the supplement industry is not tightly regulated, choosing a reputable brand that undergoes third-party testing for purity and potency is key. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you are describing, while terrifying and severe, is an experience that others in the celiac community have reported during a powerful reaction. The systemic inflammation triggered by gluten exposure in someone with celiac disease can absolutely extend far beyond the digestive tract, creating a cascade of symptoms that feel like your entire body is in revolt. The severe pain, neuropathy, muscle and jaw tension, and intense anxiety and confusion are all potential manifestations of this body-wide inflammatory and autoimmune response. It's a well-documented phenomenon that a celiac attack can provoke a significant neurological and psychological component, including "brain fog," disorientation, and panic-level anxiety. While your first step should always be to meticulously re-check all foods, medications, and even cross-contamination sources, it's also possible that a previously safe product has changed its formula or that you encountered a hidden source. 
    • Scott Adams
      The substance you're likely thinking of is "mannitol," which is a sugar alcohol, and it is indeed used as a sweetener in some "sugar-free" products. However, for an MRI, the drink is almost certainly "Mannite," which is a brand name for a laxative preparation used to cleanse the bowel before the scan. Its primary purpose is not to sweeten but to create a clear image by distending the bowel and stimulating a bowel movement. While the names sound similar, the function and formulation are very different from a small-quantity sweetener. That said, your concern is valid and should be addressed with your healthcare team. The most important step you can take is to call the MRI department or your referring doctor directly. Explain your specific reaction to sweeteners in detail—mentioning the throat and ear sensations is crucial as it could indicate a more significant sensitivity. They can confirm the exact drink they use, check its full ingredient list for you, and determine if an alternative prep is available or if pre-medication is recommended to ensure your safety and comfort during the procedure.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.