Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results - Interpretation/next Steps?


Tim86

Recommended Posts

Tim86 Apprentice

I just received my results from blood testing for Celiac. They are calling the results "negative for Celiac", since everything is within their reference limits. Do you see anything in here that might indicate differently than the doctor's opinion? Would any of these items hint at a gluten sensitivity, even if it isn't Celiac? What should I do next (request additional blood work or other tests, or just be happy I don't have Celiac)?

Results:

Tiss Transglutamin IgA - 1 U/mL (0-3 reference)

Tiss Transglutamin IgG - 1 U/mL (0-3 reference)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Ab - 2.4 U/mL (0-10 reference)

Anti-Gliadin IgA Ab - 3.3 U/mL (0-10 reference)

Endomysial IgA Ab - Negative

IgA - 247 MG/DL (70-400 reference)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

The good news is your doctor ran the full panel, so you were as thoroughly evaluated (via bloodwork). You are not IgA deficient, which increases the accuracy of your IgA based tests.

Keep in mind:

-some people with Celiac do not test positive on the bloodwork, and only test positive on the biopsy

-some people have a problem with gluten that does not show up on bloodwork

It may be worthwhile to try a gluten free diet for a few weeks to see if your symptoms improve, and keep pursuing other avenues.

Tim86 Apprentice
...It may be worthwhile to try a gluten free diet for a few weeks to see if your symptoms improve, and keep pursuing other avenues.

I tried a gluten-free diet for a month in March, but only had a moderate improvement in constipation/diarrhea symptoms. No improvement in sleep, acid reflux, fatigue, and headaches. It didn't feel like is worth the effort to stay on the gluten-free diet. Now that I have these test results, I'm even less inclined to stick with a gluten-free diet. Should I be more concerned, or do these test results give me a sufficient reason to not bother with the gluten-free diet?

nora-n Rookie

Your numbers are not 0....

Have you been eating enough gluten for the tests to be positive? The tests are calibrated to show positive only with significant damage, and usually one has to consume much gluten for significant damage.

Maybe you are just in the beginning of celiac.

It took me seven months off gluten to get rid of my fatigue.

You can go back on 0,3-0,5 mg gluten per kg for some months if you want to, and then get tested again. that would be 8-15 slices of bread a day or more, depending on weight.

nora

Tim86 Apprentice

Can anyone else offer some advice on this, please?

leadmeastray88 Contributor

In my opinion, a month-long gluten free diet is not long enough to be able to determine that it isn't an issue for you.

I would suggest giving it another go, except for a good solid 3 months. You said you noticed mild improvement, that's still something!

It took 2 months for all of my symptoms to start going away, about 6 for them to be completely gone. I had every single symptom you listed. For 4 years I was on a double dose of Losec for my acid reflux, now I don't have to take anything. I also had chronic constipation, now I am completely regular. I used to have terrible mid-day fatigue, now I have so much energy. Maybe it'll be the same for you, maybe not. You won't know unless you try. Like you, I had negative bloodwork, yet the gluten free diet has obviously done wonders for my health.

What other avenues have you explored?

tarnalberry Community Regular

I agree with happygirl. If you found that a month gluten free made some difference for the positive, then you should probably try it again. A month is hardly enough time to master the diet (no using old toasters, watch out for fries in shared friers, etc.) and even a month 100% gluten free is not enough time for many people to see full results.

Realize too, that positive results on the dietary challenge are positive results - your body is telling you that it's better off gluten. That doesn't mean gluten is the only thing your body is having an issue with. (Dairy is far more likely to give me constipation and headaches than gluten, for instance. But my headaches (chronic migraines) are actually primarily caused by poor neck posture creating constant tension. Dietary changes wouldn't do a thing for that.)

And there's no reason that fatigue would have cleared up in only a month if it was due to iron deficiency or B-vit deficiency from malabsorption. These things take months of heavy supplementation, on a healed gut, to remedy. If you haven't had your vitamin/mineral levels checked, it's well worth doing so.

A good way to test the diet is to go *100%* gluten free for three months, then load up on gluten for the next week. If you feel worse after eating gluten than you did when you were gluten free... well, if hitting yourself in the head with a hammer hurts, why would you?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tim86 Apprentice

Good responses so far. Would anyone else like to add their knowledge on this topic? I'm still not confident what I should do next.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,197
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.