Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Exempt From Labeling


phakephur

Recommended Posts

phakephur Apprentice

I'm annoyed that a local dairy is exempt from labeling requirements because they put their products in glass bottles (calico_jo, you are probably familiar with Maple View Dairy). The ingredients are not listed on the web site. Nutritional brochures are supposed to be available at the store, but when I asked for one at Whole Foods it wasn't readily available and took about a week to get.

The milk is produced without hormones. It's cheaper than national brands and I like the idea of supporting local agriculture. I have a copy of the nutritional info now, but who knows when that will be outdated. I'd like to buy their chocolate milk, but I can't apply the rule of "every label, every time".

I just don't think there should be a labeling exemption for recyclable packaging. They could alter the cap to inclue the information.

Has anyone else run into something like this? Now I'm curious about what products or packaging qualify for exemption.

Sarah


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lotusgem Rookie

Sarah,

that's ridiculous! Are you in the U.S.?

Paula

phakephur Apprentice

Yes.

This is a local dairy that bottles their products in those old style glass bottles that you take back to the store for deposit refund. So because the glass bottles are actually reused (not recycled as I mistyped earlier), there is some sort of exemption in play. But they have small platic bottles with chocolate milk, etc. in them which are recyclable and can not be returned for refund and those also have no ingredient list or nutritional information.

Additionally, there is no contact info given to find out ingredients as there is, or used to be, on some small packaging. Sometimes you'll see the ever lame "for nutritional information write to..."

I never paid much attention to it until my boyfriend who is mostly gluten-free for my benefit but doesn't have to be (which I nice until he lords it over me, but that's a topic for another post) got some buttermilk from this dairy to make fried chicken. Having read the ingredient lists for other buttermilk products I was a little alarmed, given the amount of thickener and other crap that goes into making something that should in theory be an elemental food.

So now this begins to irk me because I suspect some kind of regulation is being broken, but I'd like to find out for sure. If anyone has knowledge of this, I'd appreciate a post. Otherwise, I'll investigate and report back. I'll be at the Harris Teeter customer service desk tonight with a half gallon of chocolate milk "I need to know if there is bat urine in this"

Sarah

lotusgem Rookie

Hi again, Sarah.

That exemption thing sure sounds fishy to me, but I don't really know anything about the rules and regulations. When I was a kid, bottles were the ONLY containers for milk, and I remember what the lids were like. I can't see any reason why they couldn't at least list the ingredients on the lids; there'd be enough room. I didn't realize how late in the day it is (too much time spent cruising the Celiac message board!) and when I called the FDA I found out after a five minute tour of their telephone menu, that they close at 4pm EST. Their number is 1-888-463-6332 in case you'd like to talk to them yourself.

Let us know what you find out.

Paula

Guest ajlauer

I'm pretty sure the recyclable (not reusable) bottles must have the info on them. Either that or, "this item not labeled for individual sale". There's no reason for the exemption on the glass bottles either. They could very easily make a plastic or paper label to put around the bottles. Let us know what you find out.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Jmartes71 commented on Scott Adams's article in Multiple Sclerosis and Celiac Disease
      4

      Gluten-Free Diet Linked to Reduced Inflammation and Improved Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (+Video)

    2. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Product Labeling Regulations
      2

      FDA Moves to Improve Gluten Labeling—What It Means for People With Celiac Disease

    3. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      nothing has changed

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Is it gluten?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,350
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bea71
    Newest Member
    Bea71
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.