Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

2 Negative Tests...no Relief. What Next? 4 Year Old.


avery's mom

Recommended Posts

avery's mom Newbie

Hi, I'm new to this site and have read and read and read many posts. My DD was born prematurely and had a few issues when born. She was only preemie formula for a few months and then found had horrible diareha and switched to soy formula which worked great. We kept her on soy milk when she turned 1 for a few months until she was tested by an allergist who insisted she was not allergic to milk and her pedi said it was ok to put her back on milk. We did that. But, when she was 18 months old and got a bad UTI and as a standard, i guess, was tested for kidney reflux , which she did have. But, on the xrays they also saw severe constipation. We never knew - she had BM's everday and never seemed in pain. Starting then we saw a gastro. We put her on Kondremul for quite a few months and had follow-up x-rays to show she wasn't constipated - we would slowly back off the kondremul and go on our marry way until it started back up again in a month or sow. She did did very well potting training at 2 1/2 , but by 3 1/2 she started having 5-6 accidents a day. seeing a uroligst and gastro - saying that she was having bladder spasms caused by the constipation. so...we've been on a med to help with bladder spasms, miralax for a few months....the meds have helped, she now only has 1 or no accidents in a day. but....my question is: could this be celiacs? the doc's don't seemed concerned about WHAT is causing the bladder spasms or the constipation - all they seem to care about is that it's better now. I don't want her on the med forever and i want to find out what's causing and fix THAT. she was tested for celiacs at age 2 and again at age 4 - both negative. Any thoughts about what to do next? I would appreciate any insight.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



carsondcat Newbie

I feel for your frustration with the medical profession but my biggest insight for you is don't give up trying to find out what the cause of her symptoms are, medications can mask symptoms and that's what they are treating the symptoms and not the cause.... i do know that it can take up to 12 months for the colon to recover from constipation. i also know that you can get negative results for celiacs. So be a pro active mother and make a pest of your self until they find the cause of her illness and good luck i hope you find the answer soon.

ang1e0251 Contributor

A child that young will often test negative for celiac disease even if they have it. That's no comfort. What would you think about working with your dr to put her on an elimination diet to see if this problem can be related to a food sensitivity? If you come from a different angle to your dr, he might be more interested in your search for answers. Especially an answer that doesn't require much work on his part.

happygirl Collaborator

Try the gluten free diet to see if it helps your little one's symptoms - you don't need a doctor's permission to try the diet.

While you are trying the diet, it may be worth it to get your child's records and find another doctor for a second (or third, fourth, etc) opinion.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.