Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do Non Certified Oats Really Have Gluten?


sparkly

Recommended Posts

sparkly Newbie

I have a gluten free household, and the cost of Bob's Red Mill certified gluten-free oats is killing us. I wonder if their regular oats are really glutinous...I'd rather eat those because they're organic, and half the price of the non-organic gluten-free ones.

My thoughts:

They clean out their equipment between items, and throw out the first (30?) lbs.

I've been using their other products--say, cornmeal--for years (there didn't used to be a gluten-free cornmeal). How is corn different from regular oats? Both could have been grown with wheat, next door to wheat, etc. Both are made in the same factory.

I used to eat McCann's, after hearing from many that they are considered "safe".

Why isn't there a warning on BRM products like, say, cornmeal, saying that the corn may have been grown with soy, which is not uncommon, or that they are made in the same factory? Both corn and soy are major allergens, after all. (I don't think there's a warning). I feel skeptical, like they realize the gluten-free market is huge and a good money maker.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

Wheat and oats are similar in many physical ways. The farmer will use the same harvesting equipment, transportation equipment, and so forth for oats as for wheat, and this continues all the way along the supply line. As a result, the oats are almost certain to be contaminated with wheat. The reverse is equally true: commercial wheat is contaminated with oats.

Corn, on the other hand, is harvested and processed very differently, and the equipment is not used for other crops.

JennyC Enthusiast

Bob's Red Mill gluten free oats are grown separate from wheat, processed by wheat-free equipment on the field, transported and stored separate from wheat, and processed in a separate factory. BRM goes through a lot of effort to ensure the gluten free status of their oats. Remember that oats do have some structural similarities with gluten grains, and an estimated ten percent of celiac patients react to gluten free oats. If you can tolerate oats, I think the extra cost is well worth it.

Korwyn Explorer

I have a gluten free household, and the cost of Bob's Red Mill certified gluten-free oats is killing us. I wonder if their regular oats are really glutinous...I'd rather eat those because they're organic, and half the price of the non-organic gluten-free ones.

My thoughts:

They clean out their equipment between items, and throw out the first (30?) lbs.

I've been using their other products--say, cornmeal--for years (there didn't used to be a gluten-free cornmeal). How is corn different from regular oats? Both could have been grown with wheat, next door to wheat, etc. Both are made in the same factory.

I used to eat McCann's, after hearing from many that they are considered "safe".

Why isn't there a warning on BRM products like, say, cornmeal, saying that the corn may have been grown with soy, which is not uncommon, or that they are made in the same factory? Both corn and soy are major allergens, after all. (I don't think there's a warning). I feel skeptical, like they realize the gluten-free market is huge and a good money maker.

Gluten is not an allergen (by FDA standards) first of all. So the fact that anyone bothers to label and concern themselves with cross-contamination is terrific. "Secondly, FDA regulations (21 CFR 101.100(a)(3)) exempt from ingredient declaration incidental additives, such as processing aids, that are present in a food at insignificant levels and that do not have a technical or functional effect in the finished food.". FDA Allergy warning letter from 2004. This portion of the requirements still stands, and 'cross-contamination' is not considered an allergen threat.

Many manufactureres ARE labelling potential cross-contamination sources ('Produced in a shared facility...', etc), but once again they are only applying the 'Top 8' allergen list.

Also, the gluten-free labelling which went into effect Jan 1, 2008 states, "In addition, a food made from

oats that bears a gluten-free claim in its labeling would be deemed misbranded if the claim suggests that all such foods are gluten-free or if 20 ppm or more gluten is present in the food." So for them to label oats gluten free they MUST be able to certify a presence of less than 20 ppm. Many oats which are not specifically grown as gluten-free oats do not meet this requirement.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,705
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lyana Chahine
    Newest Member
    Lyana Chahine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wends
      Be interesting to see the effects of dairy reintroduction with gluten. As well as milk protein sensitivity in and of itself the casein part particularly has been shown to mimic gluten in about 50% of celiacs. Keep us posted!
    • deanna1ynne
      She has been dairy free for six years, so she’d already been dairy free for two years at her last testing and was dairy free for the entire gluten challenge this year as well (that had positive results). However, now that we’re doing another biopsy in six weeks, we decided to do everything we can to try to “see” the effects, so we decided this past week to add back in dairy temporarily for breakfast (milk and cereal combo like you said).
    • Gigi2025
      Hi Christiana, Many thanks for your response.  Interestingly, I too cannot eat wheat in France without feeling effects (much less than in the US, but won't indulge nonetheless).  I also understand children are screened for celiac in Italy prior to starting their education. Wise idea as it seems my grandson has the beginning symptoms (several celiacs in his dad's family), but parents continue to think he's just being difficult.  Argh.  There's a test I took that diagnosed gluten sensitivity in 2014 via Entero Labs, and am planning on having done again.  Truth be told, I'm hoping it's the bromine/additives/preservatives as I miss breads and pastas terribly when home here in the states!  Be well and here's to our guts healing ❤️
    • Wends
      Lol that’s so true! Hope you get clarity, it’s tough when there’s doubt. There’s so much known about celiac disease with all the scientific research that’s been done so far yet practically and clinically there’s also so much unknown, still. Out of curiosity what’s her dairy consumption like? Even compared to early years to now? Has that changed? Calcium is dependent in the mechanism of antigen presenting cells in the gut. High calcium foods with gluten grains can initiate inflammation greater.  This is why breakfast cereals and milk combo long term can be a ticking time bomb for genetically susceptible celiacs (not a scientific statement by any means but my current personal opinion based on reasoning at present). Milk and wheat are the top culprits for food sensitivity. Especially in childhood. There are also patient cases of antibodies normalising in celiac children who had milk protein intolerance/ delayed type allergy. Some asymptomatic. There were a couple of cases of suspected celiacs that turned out to have milk protein intolerance that normalised antibodies on a gluten containing diet. Then there were others that only normalised antibodies once gluten and milk was eliminated. Milk kept the antibodies positive. Celiac disease is complicated to say the least.
    • deanna1ynne
      And thank you for your encouragement. I am glad that her body is doing a good job fighting it. I also just want clarity for her moving forwards. She was only 6 for the last round of testing and she's 10 now, so I'm also hoping that makes a difference. It was weird during her last round of testing though, because right before her biopsy, we'd upped her gluten intake by giving her biscuits made from straight up vital wheat gluten, and her labs actually normalized slightly (lower ttg and her ema went negative). Bodies just do weird things sometimes! lol
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.