Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I'm So Frustrated, Please Help Me Out!

lyoung2

Recommended Posts

lyoung2 Rookie
lyoung2
Posted

Here's my story

First Dr. in August of 2004 did blood work and colonoscopy not sure what he was going to find. His assistant called 1 week later and said b/w showed celiac disease and get on the gluten-free diet, which I did. When I called back 2 months later to discuss my progress he literally laughed at me for going gluten-free because my b/w was only partially marked by celiac disease. Here are my results.

Blood work from Dr.'s lab:

IgA <20

IgG H39 (moderate to stong positive)

Ttg <20

So, I went ahead and did some testing of my own with Kimball and Enterolab to show him. He of course blew those away also because he said I still didn't have enough markers for celiac disease. See test below.

Kimball Genetics cheek swab:

DQ2 (DQA1*05/DQB1*02) negative

DQA1*0501 or *0505 detected

DQB1*0201 or *0202 not detected

DQ8 (DQB1*0302) positive

DQB1*0302 detected

EnteroLob stool sample:

IgA 39 units (negative <10)

Ttg 37 units (negative <10)

Fecal Fat 88 units (negative <300)

I also tested positive for yeast (21 units) and milk (27 units).

I went for a second opinion with another Dr. who has experience with celiac disease. He also mentioned that "normally" the only confirmed diagnosis that a Dr. will accept is an endoscopy. He did agree that I did not have enough of the celiac disease markers as well.

So after being gluten-free for 8 months, I went off the diet for 4 weeks, feeling horrible and having my migranes return (which went away after 2 months gluten-free). Well, you guessed it, a negative biopsy.

Could it just be that I have an intolerance to wheat and not celiac disease? I just don't know what to do next. I'm thinking of just keeping a food diary for a few months if I have to and mark all symptoms down and take it back to him. I'm just so angry that I can't get a conclusive answer. I've also thought about trying the IBS diet and seeing what results I have with that, but my brain says that the Enterolab results just can't be wrong and I should stay away from the wheat.

Any feedback would so greatly be appreciated.

Laura

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


lyoung2 Rookie
lyoung2
Posted
  • Author

Here's my story

First Dr. in August of 2004 did blood work and colonoscopy not sure what he was going to find. His assistant called 1 week later and said b/w showed celiac disease and get on the gluten-free diet, which I did. When I called back 2 months later to discuss my progress he literally laughed at me for going gluten-free because my b/w was only partially marked by celiac disease. Here are my results.

Blood work from Dr.'s lab:

IgA <20

IgG H39 (moderate to stong positive)

Ttg <20

So, I went ahead and did some testing of my own with Kimball and Enterolab to show him. He of course blew those away also because he said I still didn't have enough markers for celiac disease. See test below.

Kimball Genetics cheek swab:

DQ2 (DQA1*05/DQB1*02) negative

DQA1*0501 or *0505 detected

DQB1*0201 or *0202 not detected

DQ8 (DQB1*0302) positive

DQB1*0302 detected

EnteroLob stool sample:

IgA 39 units (negative <10)

Ttg 37 units (negative <10)

Fecal Fat 88 units (negative <300)

I also tested positive for yeast (21 units) and milk (27 units).

I went for a second opinion with another Dr. who has experience with celiac disease. He also mentioned that "normally" the only confirmed diagnosis that a Dr. will accept is an endoscopy. He did agree that I did not have enough of the celiac disease markers as well.

So after being gluten-free for 8 months, I went off the diet for 4 weeks, feeling horrible and having my migranes return (which went away after 2 months gluten-free). Well, you guessed it, a negative biopsy.

Could it just be that I have an intolerance to wheat and not celiac disease? I just don't know what to do next. I'm thinking of just keeping a food diary for a few months if I have to and mark all symptoms down and take it back to him. I'm just so angry that I can't get a conclusive answer. I've also thought about trying the IBS diet and seeing what results I have with that, but my brain says that the Enterolab results just can't be wrong and I should stay away from the wheat.

Any feedback would so greatly be appreciated.

Laura

celiac3270 Collaborator
celiac3270
Posted

Deleted by poster. See Open Original Shared Link

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

If you were gluten free for 8 months and then only went back on gluten for 4 weeks then a negative biopsy could result in that. They recommend a good 3 months of heavily consuming gluten before testing.

The Enterolab is a good test even though it is not widely accepted by the medical community. I have heard nothing but great things about it and they are on to something big. Also 98% of celiacs have the DQ2 or DQ8 gene....you have the DQ8 gene.

Before you had blood tests the first time were you gluten free? When they did the colonoscopy what did they conclude?

Did you notice a big difference after going gluten free? It sounds like you definitely have a problem with gluten.

darlindeb25 Collaborator
darlindeb25
Posted

Laura--yes, you could be gluten intolerant and are on the way to full blown celiacs--Dr. Green says that if you do have the DQ 8 gene, then chances are good you could be celiac--at any rate--if you feel better gluten-free then go gluten-free--dont let any doctor change your mind about it--i feel you are a celiac and they just have not found the spot that shows them--its your body, your health--take care of it--its the only one you will ever have---Deb

lyoung2 Rookie
lyoung2
Posted
  • Author

Thank you Kaiti for your reply.

The initial blood work and colonoscopy from the first Dr. was NOT gluten-free. When I did Kimball and Enterolab, I had only been gluten-free for 1.5 months.

I definately did feel better gluten-free, but not 100% which was why Dr. #2 wanted the endoscopy. I told him all of my concerns about not having enough damage or sporadic and he assured me he would do multiple biopsies.

I guess there could have been cross contamintation issues as DH is not gluten-free. I will go back to gluten-free and try to be more careful and see if I can't get to being 100% better. I had been sick for so many years, I was looking for a conclusive answer, but I don't think I'm going to get one :(

Thanks again,

Laura

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

It's good you were feeling better though. At least you know there is a gluten issue.

When you went gluten free were you 100% gluten free? Like did you check lipsticks (alot have wheat starch) and other products that you put on your hands, face, and head which can easily get into your mouth.

Is there a reason why you need an official diagnosis. The only way to go for that is go on gluten for 3 months but if that causes problems is that worth it? Especially when you have positive Enterolab and a main gene.

If you need any help with anything let me know :D

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

I agree with Kaiti, if you know that your body reacts badly to gluten, and is better without, then why put yourself through any more frustration and pain with further testing. You DO show markers for celiac, you just may not have sustained large amounts of damage yet. IMHO gluten intolerance is GLUTEN INTOLERANCE and you know your body better than any dr. Especially since most of the Dr's out there are operating under outdated information and with labs that don't know how to read the test results.

I'm so glad my Dr. recognized all of my symptoms as Celiac BEFORE he did test one. He saved me so much unnecessary suffering and pain and got me onto the road to recovery so much quicker. When I went to him for my yearly follow ups the first year gluten-free and then the second year gluten-free, he was so pleased with my recovery and I'm so pleased too!

christicrete Rookie
christicrete
Posted

I, like you, have a nin-com-poop for a doctor. YOU and only YOU know your body and what you need for it. If you can shop for another doctor do it, if you can't, go to your appointment and leave knowing you know more than someone who spent way too much money on their college education! If it makes you feel better, treat yourself as if you a celiac, diagnosis or not (thats what I do :D ). I am finally starting to feel better now that I don't live and breathe what the doc says. That doc does not have to live with your body, you do, so you do what you need to to be healthy!

Christi

christicrete Rookie
christicrete
Posted

oh and Laura,

If you are like me and think you need an official diagnosis to prove you are not insane and this is all in your head, here is your official diagnosis.

positive celiac disease!!!!

ok, so it may be your favorite music celiac disease, celiac's disease, or Christi's dementia,

You decide ;)

Christi

GFManiac Rookie
GFManiac
Posted

I have a friend that is allergic to wheat (shows up on allergy tests), but negative blood tests for celiac. Has a physical reaction to wheat without the villi damage...

celiac3270 Collaborator
celiac3270
Posted

Sorry, everyone, this post will look a little weird. There were two posts made and I said DUPLICATE under one, but posted right before Deb did, so she hadn't seen the notice. Then someone else posted under Deb, etc. Meanwhile the other topic also developed. So I just merged them--hence, the two first posts say the same thing.

lyoung2 Rookie
lyoung2
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all so much for your responses. I'm so tired of going around in circles, and you have helped me out with your words of wisdom.

Kaiti, I know you asked why I was looking for an official diagnosis, and I guess my answer to that is because both Dr's were trying to tell me that it must be something else because the diet was not working 100%, only about 80%. And because some of my b/w was border line, I was starting to believe them.

So, I am going to go back on the diet and be way more careful with not just food, but also the beauty products, as well as taking the dairy out which Enterolab says I have an issue with too. I am going to ignore the dr's for now and see how things go for a few weeks.

Thanks again for all your support.

Laura

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,635
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    dysmathers
    Newest Member
    dysmathers
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Buckwheat

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Frequent nausea after gluten-free diet

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
    • Inkie
      Thee

      By Inkie · Posted

      I  notice a reaction to tea bags, possibly due to gluten or other substances. Is this recognizable?
    • trents
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By trents · Posted

      The blood tests you had done are not the main ones. The two main ones are the "Total IGA" (to check for IGA deficiency) and the "TTG-IGA". Current guidelines for the "gluten challenge" when people have been gluten free for a significant time period are the daily consumption of at least10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. That should give you some perspective.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.