Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Question:


Simona19

Recommended Posts

Simona19 Collaborator

Is there any difference between regular upper endoscopy and capsule endoscopy? Do you need to have the regular endoscopy to be diagnosed with celiac disease, or the capsule endoscopy is enough?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emilushka Contributor

In a regular upper endoscopy, the patient is put under "twilight sedation" (you're technically not unconscious, but you don't remember it and you're drowsy the whole time). A camera is put through the mouth, down the throat, through the stomach, and into the upper small intestine. This allows some looking around and also allows for biopsies to be performed. The physician controls the camera the whole time.

In a capsule endoscopy, a little capsule with a camera in it is swallowed. The patient is awake as per normal for the entire procedure. The camera-capsule goes through the entire GI tract, taking pictures at random the whole time. The physician does not control which pictures are taken when (except to program the thing ahead of time) and no biopsies are taken.

The traditional "gold standard diagnosis" for Celiac Disease (which is being dropped by docs who know what they're doing because it's so unreliable) is to get the regular upper endoscopy and rely on the microscopic analysis of the biopsies taken. There are some things you can see even with the naked eye through the camera (or in the pictures from the capsule) that are extremely typical of Celiac, but it's not the "gold standard". However, there are lots of people who end up with normal biopsies but positive antibody panels, or people who end up with negative antibody panels but a positive biopsy sample. All the tests currently available for diagnosing Celiac are imperfect and that's why good docs will really hunt down the answer for you using any means necessary. For those who are really suffering, a trial gluten-free diet may be the only way to get an answer, even after a negative workup.

It's frustrating to doctors because many of them rely on tests to have confirmation. They often just don't have the balls to diagnose without a confirmatory test, or may be bound by insurance company billing regulations. Also, doctors like ANSWERS. They are trained to be that way. For older doctors, there's less awareness of Celiac and how to diagnose it responsibly because most of the research and improvements in the testing has been recent. Docs are supposed to keep up with the times, but Celiac's is lower on the list than something like breast cancer so many docs seem to have missed out on the information updates recently.

It's frustrating for patients because while all this testing is going on, you're still suffering. You wait for results, but it's hard to know what the results mean unless they're clearly positive. And often they contradict themselves or are unclear or are negative. Sometimes the gluten-free diet is the only way to get a good diagnosis, and sometimes the docs aren't smart enough to take that as the evidence it is. Docs are far from perfect, and sometimes they're just plain bad. Having a bad doc or a doc who doesn't understand is even MORE frustrating for a patient who's been suffering without a diagnosis or effective method of therapy.

I waxed a little poetic, but I hope at least the stuff about endoscopies was useful to you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,246
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kathleen weber
    Newest Member
    Kathleen weber
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      No, I would not say this at all. If you were diagnosed with celiac disease and were gluten-free for a while, you could have gone into remission. Everyone's body is different, and some celiacs may be able to get regular contamination and not end up with damaged villi and positive antibody tests, while others who ingest tiny amounts will relapse and have full blown symptoms and flattened villi.  Only a full gluten challenge would reveal where you are at this point. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs.      
    • Pablohoyasaxa
      Great  post. The skin issue can be intolerable. I have been taking niacinamide for the past month and have improved with respect to the blistering lesions. 
    • knitty kitty
      I've found taking Niacin Vitamin B 3 in the form that causes flushing (nicotinic acid) helps immensely to clear my skin.  The flushing is harmless and goes away the longer Niacin is taken.  The flushing (vasodilation in the skin) helps the body get rid of the tTg 3 IgA antibodies that cause the blisters.  TTg 2 IgA antibodies are found in the blood and are measured in diagnostic testing for Celiac.  People with Dermatitis Herpetiformis make tTg 3 as well as tTg 2 antibodies.  Niacin Vitamin B3 in the non flushing form niacinamide also works without the flushing, but takes a bit longer.   I also avoid foods containing high levels of iodine because iodine activates the tTg 3 IgA antibodies to become more active and make more blisters.  I avoid kelp (nori, seaweed) and crustaceans,  eggs, dairy products, and iodized table salt.   Niacinamide and Nicotinic acid are water soluble and harmless.  I'd much rather take Niacin than Dapsone with scary side effects.  
    • meghanf
      We have a gluten-free household. It's the least stressful option. No one else in my family has Celiac, but they are all extremely supportive. We don't even have Play-doh for this kids.
×
×
  • Create New...