Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do We Need An Endoscopy?


Staceyshoe

Recommended Posts

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Both my boys have had digestive issues from birth (different problems though). We did genetic testing on them just to see whether celiac is a possibility. My oldest (5 y.o.) ds tested positive for THE celiac gene and subtype most likely to result in the disorder. Since he's eating gluten now, we just went in for the blood panel. He's been on gluten-free diets in the past for up to 4-6 weeks, and we didn't notice any real change. But our family recently went gluten-free for a while (my youngest was diagnosed with a severe wheat allergy), and I noticed more problems with my oldest when he started eating gluten again. Nothing major. Nothing that makes me feel I can conclude that gluten is definitely an issue. Definitely not the stereotypical picture of celiac disease.

Still waiting on the results of the blood test. If it's negative, I may do a gluten-free trial and see what happens. If it's positive, the GI wants to do an endoscopy. I'm hesitant about that test. Ds has a scope 3 years ago, and it was emotionally traumatic for him. So here are my questions:

* The blood panel is notorious for false negatives, right? So if it's positive, what is the likelihood that he doesn't have celiac? I guess I don't see the point of the scope.

* If he's creating antibodies to gluten, does it really matter whether they happen to find no damage, mild damage, or severe damage in his intestines?

* Or does it make sense to find out what's happening in there and get an official diagnosis? (This GI won't diagnose without the scope.) Part of me wants to know for sure whether he has it because the diets haven't given a clear indication and because there are other family members with blatant symptoms who don't see a need to get tested or go gluten-free. But I also don't want the scope. Wouldn't the bloodwork be fairly conclusive?

I'm so thankful this forum is here! I've already learned a lot, but I am really struggling with what our next step should be.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



shopgirl Contributor

Yes, the blood panel can show false negatives but rarely false positives. Particularly in a child who can't build up a couple decades of damage.

If he's creating antibodies, no, it doesn't matter the amount of damage. He'll heal on a careful diet.

The only thing that might make you want a scope is cooperation from his school. They may not make necessary allowances for his diet and contamination issues without a diagnosis from a doctor. And if your doctor isn't willing to give an official diagnosis without the scope, you might run into some problems. Maybe ask the school if that would be an issue?

Skylark Collaborator

I completely agree with Shopgirl. The blood panel is 98% accurate in kids.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

I completely trust the knowledge of those who have been on this board for a while. I am satisfied that, if his blood panel is positive, it means he has celiac. Do you happen to know of any links that give info about the reliability of the blood test on a child? (If dh or other family members question me if the dr doesn't give an official diagnosis, I'd like to have something to show them that it's reasonable to assume celiac based on the bloodwork.) TIA!

Skylark Collaborator

Which blood test?

divamomma Enthusiast

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Which blood test?

I'm still waiting on the results, but I remember the dr mentioning that he was ordering a ttg and IgA and something to make sure ds isn't IgA deficient. There may be more also. I'll request a copy of the report so will know more after it's been processed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Different labs have different "normal" ranges because the test results are in arbitrary units. Something one lab calls 10 on a scale of 1-20, another lab could call 100 on a scale of 10-200. You have to have the range that lab considers normal to interpret the test. I've seen pretty big numbers from some European labs. If your TTG was above the normal range for that diagnostic lab you should have an endoscopy and be seriously considering gluten-free.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,670
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CDR40
    Newest Member
    CDR40
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.