Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do We Need An Endoscopy?


Staceyshoe

Recommended Posts

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Both my boys have had digestive issues from birth (different problems though). We did genetic testing on them just to see whether celiac is a possibility. My oldest (5 y.o.) ds tested positive for THE celiac gene and subtype most likely to result in the disorder. Since he's eating gluten now, we just went in for the blood panel. He's been on gluten-free diets in the past for up to 4-6 weeks, and we didn't notice any real change. But our family recently went gluten-free for a while (my youngest was diagnosed with a severe wheat allergy), and I noticed more problems with my oldest when he started eating gluten again. Nothing major. Nothing that makes me feel I can conclude that gluten is definitely an issue. Definitely not the stereotypical picture of celiac disease.

Still waiting on the results of the blood test. If it's negative, I may do a gluten-free trial and see what happens. If it's positive, the GI wants to do an endoscopy. I'm hesitant about that test. Ds has a scope 3 years ago, and it was emotionally traumatic for him. So here are my questions:

* The blood panel is notorious for false negatives, right? So if it's positive, what is the likelihood that he doesn't have celiac? I guess I don't see the point of the scope.

* If he's creating antibodies to gluten, does it really matter whether they happen to find no damage, mild damage, or severe damage in his intestines?

* Or does it make sense to find out what's happening in there and get an official diagnosis? (This GI won't diagnose without the scope.) Part of me wants to know for sure whether he has it because the diets haven't given a clear indication and because there are other family members with blatant symptoms who don't see a need to get tested or go gluten-free. But I also don't want the scope. Wouldn't the bloodwork be fairly conclusive?

I'm so thankful this forum is here! I've already learned a lot, but I am really struggling with what our next step should be.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



shopgirl Contributor

Yes, the blood panel can show false negatives but rarely false positives. Particularly in a child who can't build up a couple decades of damage.

If he's creating antibodies, no, it doesn't matter the amount of damage. He'll heal on a careful diet.

The only thing that might make you want a scope is cooperation from his school. They may not make necessary allowances for his diet and contamination issues without a diagnosis from a doctor. And if your doctor isn't willing to give an official diagnosis without the scope, you might run into some problems. Maybe ask the school if that would be an issue?

Skylark Collaborator

I completely agree with Shopgirl. The blood panel is 98% accurate in kids.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

I completely trust the knowledge of those who have been on this board for a while. I am satisfied that, if his blood panel is positive, it means he has celiac. Do you happen to know of any links that give info about the reliability of the blood test on a child? (If dh or other family members question me if the dr doesn't give an official diagnosis, I'd like to have something to show them that it's reasonable to assume celiac based on the bloodwork.) TIA!

Skylark Collaborator

Which blood test?

divamomma Enthusiast

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Which blood test?

I'm still waiting on the results, but I remember the dr mentioning that he was ordering a ttg and IgA and something to make sure ds isn't IgA deficient. There may be more also. I'll request a copy of the report so will know more after it's been processed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Different labs have different "normal" ranges because the test results are in arbitrary units. Something one lab calls 10 on a scale of 1-20, another lab could call 100 on a scale of 10-200. You have to have the range that lab considers normal to interpret the test. I've seen pretty big numbers from some European labs. If your TTG was above the normal range for that diagnostic lab you should have an endoscopy and be seriously considering gluten-free.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

    2. - Theresa2407 replied to chrish42's topic in Doctors
      6

      Doctors and Celiac.com

    3. - Scott Adams replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

    4. - Scott Adams replied to chrish42's topic in Doctors
      6

      Doctors and Celiac.com

    5. - trents replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,261
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne Ham
    Newest Member
    Joanne Ham
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      M&M Peanuts. About the same calories and sugar while M&M Peanuts have fiber, potassium, iron and protein that Tootsie Rolls ("We are currently producing more than 50 million Tootsie Rolls each day.") don't. Click the links to compare nutritional values.  Both are made with sugar, not high fructose corn syrup.  I use them as a gluten free substitute for a peanut butter sandwich.  Try her on grass fed, pasture fed milk. While I get heartburn at night from commercial dairy milk, I do not from 'grassmilk'.     
    • Theresa2407
      I see it everyday on my feeds.  They go out and buy gluten-free processed products and wonder why they can't heal their guts.  I don't think they take it as a serious immune disease. They pick up things off the internet which is so far out in left field.  Some days I would just like to scream.  So much better when we had support groups and being able to teach them properly. I just had an EMA blood test because I haven't had one since my Doctor moved away.  Got test results today, doctor ordered a D3 vitamin test.  Now you know what  type of doctors we have.  Now I will have to pay for this test because she just tested my D3 end of December, and still have no idea about my EMA.    
    • Scott Adams
      Some of the Cocomels are gluten and dairy-free: https://cocomels.com/collections/shop-page
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for the kind words! I keep thinking that things in the medical community are improving, but a shocking number of people still post here who have already discovered gluten is their issue, and their doctors ordered a blood test and/or endoscopy for celiac disease, yet never mentioned that the protocol for such screening requires them to be eating gluten daily for weeks beforehand. Many have already gone gluten-free during their pre-screening period, thus their test results end up false negative, leaving them confused and sometimes untreated. It is sad that so few doctors attended your workshops, but it doesn't surprise me. It seems like the protocols for any type of screening should just pop up on their computer screens whenever any type of medical test is ordered, not just for celiac disease--such basic technological solutions could actually educate those in the medical community over time.
    • trents
      The rate of damage to the villous lining of the SB and the corresponding loss of nutrient absorbing efficiency varies tremendously from celiac to celiac. Yes, probably is dose dependent if, by dose dependent you mean the amount of exposure to gluten. But damage rates and level of sensitivity also seem to depend on the genetic profile. Those with both genes HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 seem to be more sensitive to minor amounts of gluten exposure than those with just one of those genes and those with only DQ2 seem to be more sensitive than those with only DQ8. But there are probably many factors that influence the damage rate to the villi as well as intensity of reaction to exposure. There is still a lot we don't know. One of the gray areas is in regard to those who are "silent" celiacs, i.e. those who seem to be asymptomatic or whose symptoms are so minor that they don't garner attention. When they get a small exposure (such as happens in cross contamination) and have no symptoms does that equate to no inflammation? We don't necessarily know. The "sensitive" celiac knows without a doubt, however, when they get exposure from cross contamination and the helps them know better what food products to avoid.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.