Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I Wait?


bethieb

Recommended Posts

bethieb Newbie

Hi! Newbie here. My doctor had me on an elimination diet for two weeks to "heal my gut" while waiting for results of some food sensitivity testing. I avoided gluten during that time. She is now sending me for a gluten panel and told me to eat bread and pasta, etc. She said that 2 days would be enough. Thoughts? I'd hate to get onto the wrong track because of this, but do want answers. Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Hi bethieb. Gosh, I am sorry you find yourself in this position. I rail on and on about doctors who do this!! Why don't they test for celiac disease first!!! :ph34r: while you're still eating a full gluten diet. After two weeks gluten free, yes your gut will have healed some, and also the antibodies to the gliadin (protein component of wheat) will have done a bunk because they were no longer needed. And no, I don't think two days will be enough to bring them back and redamage your gut. It is really hard to guestimate how much you have healed during that time and how much gluten you would have to intake for how long to get back to where you were. If you had been totally gluten free, the advice is the equivalent of 3-4 slices of bread per day for at least two months. In your case, I really don't know; but I do think that with only two days you will end up negative for sure and the test will not tell you anything. If you have been suffering for years with drastic symptoms you might still have a chance of a positive test. But it is common to find doctors making these recommendations and then saying, no, you don't have it :o

I really don't know what to tell you, unless you want to put in the two months :(

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

I had a very positive blood test. Went gluten-free to see if it worked (I know, everything I read said not to, but I couldn't resist). When I went to see the GI I had only been 10 days gluten-free. He ordered an endoscopy and took more blood - said 10 days would not make a difference. Went home and ate wheat for 2 days.

Blood test and endoscopy were negative.

I am convinced I have it but now, if I want at least a shot at an accurate test, I have to wait 3 months. I am very impatient and the waiting is torture.

My doctor says he treats a lot with celiac disease and had never seen "healing this fast." He is not convinced that the original test was accurate, but I am. I have had multiple symptoms for last 5 years and my younger son has recently tested positive as well.

You can start testing if you want, everyone is different so it may come out positive. But if it is negative, you really won't be any closer to an answer than you are now.

bethieb Newbie

Thank you, this is what I was afraid of. I hoped that because I was only gluten free for two weeks that it would be ok. I do not have major symptoms, but because my thyroid testing came back with Hashimoto's combined with other symptoms the testing was recommended. And I felt so much better after the elimination diet :(

Here's the part that upsets me most... I can feel the difference eating the gluten makes. I'm sure that's what scares you Cara in Boston... and i question whether a diagnosis is truly needed when the treatment is diet anyway. My husband thinks it is important, I think there is a part of him that thinks the whole leaky gut/food sensitivity thing is hooey and he needs the diagnosis to believe.

I'll give it a bit longer and continue to eat gluten until the results come back. If they are negative, I will eat gluten for a longer time and then get tested again. This way I won;t end up in the same boat. Good plan?

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

I really want a clear diagnosis because that, and only that, will convince my family to get tested as well. Also, I feel like it would be important (more credible?) to have it included in my medical record so if I develop symptoms of some other, related condition, any doctor would know my complete and accurate history.

That being said, I am almost at the half-way point of the gluten challenge and I am going to ask my doctor to do another blood test. No one seems to know for sure how long it takes to show up again in your blood - it could be much less than three months. If it is there, great, I'll be done. If not, I'll go 6 more weeks and try one last time. (I've delt with the symptoms for 5 years now, what's another 6 weeks?) If there is no change I will just do the diet on my own. (actually, with my son after his endoscopy on 4/6)

I imagine that the challenge time after such a short gluten-free period wouldn't need to be as long as someone doing a challenge after years of being gluten free. Right?

I am so looking forward to feeling good and having lots of energy. It feels like the "cure" is right there, almost in my grasp and I just need to be more patient.

Also, after all the books I have read, gluten kind of grosses me out now. My husband was saying, "at least you get to enjoy your favorite foods a little longer . . ." but it is actually kind of hard to eat them now.

Cara

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Thank you, this is what I was afraid of. I hoped that because I was only gluten free for two weeks that it would be ok. I do not have major symptoms, but because my thyroid testing came back with Hashimoto's combined with other symptoms the testing was recommended. And I felt so much better after the elimination diet :(

Here's the part that upsets me most... I can feel the difference eating the gluten makes. I'm sure that's what scares you Cara in Boston... and i question whether a diagnosis is truly needed when the treatment is diet anyway. My husband thinks it is important, I think there is a part of him that thinks the whole leaky gut/food sensitivity thing is hooey and he needs the diagnosis to believe.

I'll give it a bit longer and continue to eat gluten until the results come back. If they are negative, I will eat gluten for a longer time and then get tested again. This way I won;t end up in the same boat. Good plan?

If you react strongly to adding gluten back in let your doctor know right away. When I was diagnosed I was under treatment by my allergist, I show false negatives in blood work, anyway the allergist had me on a very strict elimination diet and I added gluten back in as the second item. I had been gluten free for about 3 weeks at that point. I became very ill on the 3rd day of the challenge. He stopped the challenge and referred me back to my GI. I then finally got diagnosed.

If you have been very ill for a while and the diet helps you it should become obvious to your loved onesthat you are doing much better gluten free. They will also see what happens when you accidentally get gluten. Sometimes that in itself is pretty convincing for them.

Only my opinion, but rather than staying on gluten, (since you have already felt better off it), it might be better to go back to gluten free after testing even if the tests are negative and let your (hopefully) improved health and well being prove it to your husband.

It may end up being a moot point. If your antibodies were at a high enough level you may still have a postive test. Be sure to get a copy of the results as some doctors will call a low positive a negative but a positive is a positive.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,139
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristen Wolf
    Newest Member
    Kristen Wolf
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jpate
      Has anyone had refractory celiac type 2 for very long I have had refractory celiac type 2 for 11 years now and consider myself lucky to be alive.   
    • Jenny (AZ via TX)
    • Bev in Milw
      Reading labels at dailymed.com is simpler if you’re familiar w/ gluten-free list of inert ingredients (aka ‘excipients’  allowed by FDA.      www.gluten-free.com has that list & I’ve included It’s below…. Tricky ones for me are the “4 D’s“ because names are similar. These 2 are gluten-free by ‘legal’ definition— •Dextrans - Partially hydrolyzed corn or potato starch. •Dextrose - Powdered corn starch. Other 2 need to be questioned. (Maybe ok for isolated 7-10 day Rx,   antibiotic?,  but gluten-free status needs to be verified for long term / daily use for chronic condition, like thyroid or BP meds.)   These are : •Dextrates - Mix of sugars resulting from the controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of starch. •Dextrins - Result from the hydrolysis of starch by heat or hydrochloric acid (from corn).  It can also be obtained from wheat, rice or tapioca.  (Maltodextrin on US labels MUST be corn so gluten-free.) Technically, ‘Starch’ on USDA ‘food’ labels in US must be from corn, & if not, the source must be identified.   In drugs,‘ Pregelatinized starch’ & ‘Sodium starch glycolate’ can also be from potato, rice, OR wheat.  Wheat is more likely to be found in products made outside of US (Europe) where corn is not the major(readily available & least costly) crop.     Hope this helps even though  learning sources of some gluten-free ones may make them less appealing. (And while the “Read every label, every time” for gluten is a pain, I’ve learned there are worse things than celiac dx—Allergy to corn would be at top on my list!)          Bev in Milwaukee From www.gluten-free.com EXCIPIENT INGREDIENTS IN MEDICATIONS  Aspartame - An artificial sweetening agent derived from aspartic acid. Aspartic Acid - A crystalline amino acid found naturally in sugar beets and sugar cane.  Benzyl alcohol - Made synthetically from benzyl chloride which is derived from toluene (a tar oil). Cellulose - (ethylcellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl, microcrystalline) – Obtained from fibrous plant material (woody pulp or chemical cotton). Cetyl alcohol - Derived from a fat source (spermaceti, which is a waxy substance from the head of the sperm whale). Croscarmellose sodium - An internally cross-linked sodium carboxymethylcellulose for use as a disintegrant in pharmaceutical formulations.  Comes from wood pulp or cotton fibers to form carboxymethylcellulose.  It contains no sugar or starch. Dextrans - Partially hydrolyzed corn or potato starch. Dextrates - Mix of sugars resulting from the controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of starch. Dextrins - Result from the hydrolysis of starch by heat or hydrochloric acid (from corn).  It can also be obtained from wheat, rice or tapioca. Dextrose - Powdered corn starch. Fructose - Obtained naturally from fruits or honey; hydrolyzed cane or beet sugar. Gelatin - Obtained from the skin, white connective and bones of animals (by boiling skin, tendons, ligaments, bones, etc with water). Glycerin - Historically, glycerin (also known as glycerol), was made the following ways: -  Saponification (a type of chemical process) of fats and oils in the manufacturing of soaps -  Hydrolysis of fats and oils through pressure and superheated steam -  Fermentation of beet sugar molasses in the presence of large amounts of sodium sulfite   Today its is made mostly from propylene (a petroleum product) Glycerols - Obtained from fats and oils as byproducts in the manufacture of soaps and fatty acids (may also be listed as mono-glycerides or di-glycerides). Glycols - Products of ethylene oxide gas. Hypromellose – A brand of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (see cellulose). Iron oxide (rust) - Used as a coloring agent. Kaolin - A clay-like substance. Lactilol - Lactose derivative; a sugar alcohol. Lactose - Also known as milk sugar, is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a filler or binder for the manufacture of coated pills and tablets.   Commercially produced from cow's milk. Maltodextrins - A starch hydrolysate that is obtained from corn in the United States but can also be extracted from wheat, potato or rice. Mannitol - Derived from monosaccharides (glucose or mannose). Methyl Paraben – Comes from the combination of denatured wood alcohol and benzoic acid (benzoic acid occurs naturally in cherry bark, raspberries, tea, anise and cassia bark).  Polysorbates - Chemically altered sorbitol (a sugar alcohol). Polyvinyl alcohol – A water soluble synthetic alcohol (synthesized by hydrolysis of polyvinyl acetate). Povidone (crospovidone, copovidone) - synthetic polymers  Pregelatinized starch - A starch that has been chemically or mechanically processed.  The starch can come from corn, wheat, potato or tapioca. Shellac - A natural wax product used in tablet or capsule coating. Sodium lauryl sulfate – A derivative of the fatty acids of coconut oil. Sodium starch glycolate - Sodium salt of carboxymethyl ether of starch. Usually from potato but can be from corn, wheat or rice. Stearates (calcium, magnesium) - Derived from stearic acid (a fat; occurs as a glyceride in tallow and other animal fats and oils, as well as some vegetables; prepared synthetically by hydrogenation of cottonseed and other vegetable oils). Sucrose - Sugar also known as refined sugar, beet sugar or cane sugar. Titanium dioxide - Chemical not derived from any starch source used as a white pigment.  Triacetin – A derivative of glycerin (acetylation of glycerol). Silcon dioxide – A dispersing agent made from silicon.  
    • NoriTori
      @Scott Adams  Sure, Any and all information is welcome. Also the only was to convince my family to get tested is to get tested myself and conclusive answers. Very stubborn lot.  
    • trents
      Understood. It's very anxiety-provoking when you don't know what you are dealing with and don't know if you are attacking it correctly.
×
×
  • Create New...