Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Symptom(S) That Point To Celiac And Not Just Intol?


sreese68

Recommended Posts

sreese68 Enthusiast

Despite my bloodwork being negative, my neurologist insisted I try gluten-free for my peripheral neuropathy. I just did a 4-day gluten challenge on my own, and he was right! Now I'm trying to figure out if it's MORE LIKELY to be celiac vs intolerance. I will NOT eat more gluten to get a biopsy, so I know I can't know 100%. (Though I wonder if being gluten-free for 7 weeks and then eating it for 4 days would show enough damage?)

Anyway my symptoms:

internal feeling of shakiness and return of slight hypoglycemia (never got the hunger shakes off gluten!)

brain fog off and on

heart racing sometimes, not feeling tired at night

lightheadedness off and on

little fatigue

irritability

tingling in legs - worst it's ever been

ache in legs (may be from nerves)

constipation showed after neuro symptoms

and finally today, a canker sore (got two of these when on a trip a few weeks ago, so probably from gluten)

Oh, I also have fructose malabsorption and recently became intolerant to brown rice.

Today is 4 days after the last gluten I ate. Feeling better but still a ways to go. I'm considering getting the gene testing, though I know it's not a definite diagnosis. I think it'd be a good piece of the puzzle. Also, if I had two genes, I'd know for sure that my dad needs to be tested. My mom died from early-onset Alzheimer's (got it at 47), hence my vow to NEVER eat gluten knowingly again since I have neuro reactions.

Oh I'm seeing my neurologist tomorrow to discuss all this, but wanted some input from here, too.

Thanks!

Sharon


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

There are some folks who consider celiac and gluten intolerance to basically be the same thing but perhaps with different body systems being more severely effected. The need to be strictly gluten free is the same with each and they both have the same need for other family members to be tested.

You seem to be clearly reacting to gluten no matter what label is put on it. And yes I would suggest to your 1st degree relatives that they should be tested.

You could do gene testing if you want but it wouldn't tell you what parent you got what gene from unless your Dad was tested at the same time. In addition you can be celiac without the two most commonly associated genes and you can also have the two most commonly associated genes and never develop celiac.

Marilyn R Community Regular

I don't know how old you are, but if you're over 50 and due for a colonoscopy, you might as well have an endoscopy. It could still end up being negative, especially if there's much time evolving between when you see the gastro and when the procedures are scheduled.

Depending on where you live, you may have to insist that you have both procedures the same day. (The gastroenteroligists like to space things out in my hometown to increase their take home pay, along with that of the surgery center or hospital, anesthiesiologist, etc.)

There are times that I wish I had the firm diagnosis. I can brush off sentiments from co-workers without a problem, but when I see a medical professional, I get upset by their questions. "Are you sure it isn't in your mind?" "The results were negative?" "Your test results were inconclusive?"

I have permanent nerve and muscle damage from eating gluten. Sometimes I wish I had the diagnosis.

And btw, I have crappy insurance. The upper and lower cost me over $1,000 out of pocket. I wish I'd spent that on massages instead.

(Neuromuscular massages are great for the neoropathy.)

I haven't had the gene testing because I don't have children, and I know I inherited this from my mother. I've been sort of obnoxious to my siblings about getting tested so their kids can know.

I wish you good luck and good health.

sreese68 Enthusiast

I don't know how old you are, but if you're over 50 and due for a colonoscopy, you might as well have an endoscopy. It could still end up being negative, especially if there's much time evolving between when you see the gastro and when the procedures are scheduled.

I'm 42. I already had a colonoscopy to rule out Crohn's and IBD. I had gone to a GI for constipation and lower, right abdominal pain. Before the colonoscopy, I called my GI to ask him to check for celiac while he had me under, and he said that he saw no reason to do the procedure since I didn't have any signs of celiac. (I have constipation and not diarrhea, so according to him, I can't have celiac!) At the time, I hadn't researched celiac, so I mistakenly listened to him. I plan on asking my neuro if he knows a GI doc I should go to since I'm not going back to the first guy!

Hope all this makes sense. Brain fog has descended. Glad this site has spell check!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MamaJessica
    Newest Member
    MamaJessica
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.