Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac W/newborn


celiacmama

Recommended Posts

celiacmama Newbie

Hi! I have celiac disease (diagnosed in June '04) and am also a new mom. My son is only 3 mo. old and our pediatrician told us that they typically cannot test children for celiac disease until they are 2 years old. I'm concerned that once he's on solids (which is well before 2 yrs) and he ingests gluten, that it may cause him problems. I'm interested to know if any of you have a young child with celiac disease. If so, when did you have him/her tested? What has your experience been with your child's docs? Should I find a pediatric gastro doc? I want to give my son as much protection from gluten (if he needs it) and teach him the right way to eat as early as possible. Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Usually testing below the age of 2 is inaccurate. When he starts with solid foods keep an eye and see if there are any noticeable reactions and when he is old enough get him tested.

lovegrov Collaborator

Your pediatrician is right. Celiac blood tests are not as accurate in children under 2, and before a certain age (which would be different in different children) would be completely useless.

Most experts these days would say that you should allow your child to eat gluten the same time any other child would eat it. In fact, some recent research (which I can't find the link to) suggests that children who either eat gluten real early or who are delayed past about 12 months, are actually more likely to develop celiac.

richard

Jnkmnky Collaborator

I thought the research said that introducing grains between 4 and 6 months could trigger gluten sensitivity? I can't keep up.

lbsteenwyk Explorer

Yes, a recent study suggests that the best time to introduce gluten to minimize the possibility of developing celiac disease is between 4-6 months of age. There is also evidence that breastfeeding well past the introduction of gluten can have a beneficial impact. If you are breastfeeding, I would suggest continuing for at least 1 year (which is recommended anyway by the American Academy of Pediatrics) to supplement your child as solids are introduced.

lovegrov Collaborator

Four to six months, that's the timeframe I was trying to think of. Anyway, there's seems to be little doubt that most researchers believe that keeping a child from gluten (unless you know they have celiac disease) is more likely to trigger celiac disease once they do eat it -- and eventually they will.

richard

aidansmom Rookie

My son had "typical" celiac disease symptoms. He had lots of tummy problems as an infant - reflux, gassy, rashes, etc - but he did grow on the growth curve. I breastfed and started solids at 6 months. Then he started slowing down on growth and completely stopped growing at 9 months. From 6 months until he was diagnosed at 14 months, he would have loose stools 6-7x/day. I was a first time mom and it took me several months to realize that this was not normal. I had to push him through the system. My dr. kept saying that he was normal. Even though he eventually dropped from 50% to 3% on the growth charts.

I also have a 3 month old and I'm breastfeeding and ingesting gluten. Our dr. suggested getting the genetic test in the meantime. We plan to give him gluten at 6 months and watch for the diarrhea and growth.

By the way, gluten DOES go through breastmilk. My son would have severe reactions if I ate a french fry that was contaminated from the oil.

Congrats on your little one!! I hope he stays Celiac free.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Merika Contributor

I was diagnosed with celiac when my ds was almost 2 yrs. At first, everything with my ds stayed the same. But I realized I could not (would not) prepare gluten foods for him and also have crumbs and sticky gluten fingers all over the house. In addition, he was having some allergy symptoms/possible slight celiac symptoms, so he went gluten-free.

If your child seems perfectly healthy, just introduce foods like you normally would (when he gets old enough) and watch. Personally, I would be tempted to only feed him gluten-free when he's with you and around the house until he's much older. Let the dad, and other friends and relatives feed him gluten foods when they go out. Little kids are MESSY, and they should be :) but there is no need to gluten yourself by accident just so they can eat gluten. It's not necessary for humans to eat gluten! :)

Merika

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Product Labeling Regulations
      2

      FDA Moves to Improve Gluten Labeling—What It Means for People With Celiac Disease

    2. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      nothing has changed

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Is it gluten?

    4. - Seaperky replied to lizzie42's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      2

      Trip to Anaheim/Disney

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,350
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarah S
    Newest Member
    Sarah S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
    • asaT
      plant sources of calcium, such as spinach, have calcium bound to oxalates, which is not good. best source of calcium is unfortunately dairy, do you tolerate dairy? fermented dairy like kefir is good and or a little hard cheese. i do eat dairy, i can only take so much dietary restriction and gluten is hard enough! but i guess some people do have bad reactions to it, so different for everyone.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.