Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Can I Get In To See The Doc Sooner


Newbee

Recommended Posts

Newbee Contributor

So I got the celiac blood work back from GP and it was extremely positive (125). She referred me to see a GI doctor. I got a recommendation for a good GI doctor from someone that leads a celiac support group in town. When I called to make an appointment they told me I'd have to wait a month before I could see the doctor (and that's just for a consultation - not even the biopsy yet). They knew when I called in that it was because I had a positive blood test for celiac. I've since called back and asked if they have a waiting list and could they put me on it in case an opening came available for my doctor so that I could be seen sooner. They said yes. Not sure if that will help or not. Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions on how else I may coax them to get me in earlier. Seems like they should be able to try and fit me in sooner so I can have the biopsy and stop eating gluten and get on with my life. I hate to wait so long and continue to damage my system. And if I have to wait a month for a consultation will I have to wait a month of more for the biopsy? I was thinking maybe I should still call in and check about cancellations or perhaps try and speak to a nurse and see if I can get them to convince them to try and get me in earlier. Any suggestions would be great! Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Food for Life
Food for Life



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Little Northern Bakehouse


MJ-S Contributor

Discussing with the nurse sounds like a great idea to me.

Here's a question: If your biopsy is negative would you continue to gluten, knowing that your blood tests were positive?

If it were me, I would stop eating gluten immediately, because I don't see how the results of the biopsy would change this decision.

I'm sure others on the board are more knowledgeable about this, but the intestines take a longer time to heal than it takes for antibody levels to reduce, so I would think you could stop eating gluten, have a biopsy four weeks later, and still see the damage (assuming it's there to begin with).

Newbee Contributor

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

  • 3 weeks later...
vendeengf Newbie

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

ok how i see it is u can stop and feel better or keep eating it and feel like crap . i got my blood work back and it was positive i stopped eating gluten right there and then 6 weeks later i saw the doc 3 weeks later was scoped down the mouth then 3 weeks later took a pill(cam) not so good then 4 weeks later scpoed other end way worse then they though pollip the size of sode pop cap my doc told me he has never seen one that size that isnt cancer befor or someone my age so i say stop

mushroom Proficient

Cancellation lists work sometimes and sometimes they don't. It depends how popular the doctor is and how many people are ahead of you on the list (an important question to ask). I recently had one work for me - ended up with a dud doc, but he ordered the right test. So I saw him on Fri, had test on Mon., but they said it would be five weeks for follow-up. On the cancellation list I saw him within one week so got a copy of the report, which is what I wanted. But generally the good docs are all booked up and have lists of people waiting for cancellations. I waited 2 months last year for a cancellation and didn't get it (didn't think to ask how many people were also waiting :( ).

As for the biopsy, many people (mainly not doctors who make money from doing procedures :P ) feel it is not necessary. After all, as a pp said, if gluten makes you sick would you continue to eat it if your biopsy was negative? However, if you want the "gold standard of celiac diagnosis, you should continue to eat gluten to be sure of an accurate result. While the EGD can tell you other things besides if you have celiac, it can always be done at a later time if they are looking for something else if your symptoms do not resolve on a gluten-free diet.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Call and talk to the appointment taker. Explain that you are on the waiting list already but your really, really need to get in sooner. Ask if there is a certain time of day when you can call everyday and ask if there have been any cancelations. This worked for me last year when I had pneumonia but the ER dr said it might be something more serious based on the cloud on my lung x-ray. I needed to see a pulmonologist ASAP because everyday my breathing was getting worse. I was scared to death it might be lung cancer. The earliest appointment was a month away. I took that appointment but also asked what I could do to get in sooner. They put me on the waiting list but admitted that was a pretty long list of others also wanting to get in sooner. The appointment taker took pity on me (probably because I could barely talk) and told me that if I called everyday at 8 AM that is when they would know if anyone had called to leave a cancellation message the previous night. She got in at 7:30 and reviewed the messages in the first half hour. Although they have the waiting list and would go in order when assigning people to any cancelations she said if someone called at 8:00 AM (the office open time) that she would give any canceled slots to the person on the phone before pulling up the waiting list. It took calling everyday for a week but I did get in earlier and only had to spend about two weeks total thinking I was dying from lung cancer (turned out I just had a bad case of pneumonia and the shadow on my lung was scarring from previous lung infections).

love2travel Mentor

Our typical wait lists for specialists vary from 6-18 MONTHS. I had to wait 8 months for an MRI after an injury; 16 months to see an orthopedic surgeon; 18 months to see a chronic pain management physician; 12 months for a neurosurgeon and so on. Pretty grim here in Canada in many ways. Thankfully I only had to wait to see a gastroenterologist 4 months. My second MRI was only 6 months.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Lakefront Brewery
Smith & Truslow



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


Jungle Rookie

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

love2travel Mentor

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

Aren't the waits insane? I was told I could fly to the U.S. for an earlier appointment but as I had to eat lots of gluten for at least three months anyway I decided to go ahead and wait. (I went on the gluten challenge as gluten gives me absolutely zero GI symptoms and as such I was somewhat in denial - I need proof on paper!)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,963
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pat Martin
    Newest Member
    Pat Martin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Smith & Truslow


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    NutHouse! Granola Co.



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @CeliacNew, If you are Vegan to help you feel better, reconsider returning to omnivore.  Actually, since you are already on a very restrictive diet, transitioning to gluten free might be easier for you.  Read the ingredient labels, Particularly vitamin D and Choline require supplements for vegan diet because our primary source is sun, eggs and beef.  B12 also.
    • Wheatwacked
      Once you've completed testing and still don't have improvement, start a trial gluten free diet.  Looking for imprvement that may indicate Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, which is 10 times more prevalent than Celiac Disease. Deficiencies in vitamins B6, B12, D, and C can manifest as skin rashes.  Virtual guaranty you are deficient in vitamin D.
    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
×
×
  • Create New...