Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy


Kquad

Recommended Posts

Kquad Apprentice

I went and had a biopsy. I mentioned to the dermatologist, I had been gluten free since march. I said I heard that could give a false negative. He said that was wrong. Also, he seemed to take the 2 biopsies from directly on a lesion. I know have the results back. One was negative. The other could not be read. Should I really take this as a true negative.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



photobuff5959 Newbie

I went and had a biopsy. I mentioned to the dermatologist, I had been gluten free since march. I said I heard that could give a false negative. He said that was wrong. Also, he seemed to take the 2 biopsies from directly on a lesion. I know have the results back. One was negative. The other could not be read. Should I really take this as a true negative.

I'm new to this diagnosis, but my dermatologist knew that the biopsy had to be taken from skin that had not erupted. They have to do an immunofluorescence biopsy. There are other posts in this forum about dermatolgists who understand this and those who don't. I would get a second opinion.

itchy Rookie

My dermatologist consultant in England said emphatically that no test would work unless I maintained a high gluten diet for a couple of weeks before testing. (Why would anyone put themselves through that misery).

Based on previous comments here, that seems to be the experience.

I would find another dermatologist.

Kquad Apprentice

sent links with info about gluten free diet having false negatives and proper biopsy technique. He emailed me back and offered a trial dapsone. Stuff sounds scary a bit. Rash is a bit lighter this week after months. I know it can vary and has, but I may hold off a week. Feel good having a MD reconsider.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

A DH biopsy would not depend on currently eating gluten, just having the DH rash.

An ENDOSCOPY would depend on currently (for 3 months) eating gluten.

DH biopsies have a 37% negative rate. It is a very difficult biopsy, even if it should be positive. It is unknown why it is so highly negative - they say the iga is delicate and it's hard to get a good sample - aside from the rarity of DH (or perhaps that's why it's "rare"?).

Kquad Apprentice

A DH biopsy would not depend on currently eating gluten, just having the DH rash.

An ENDOSCOPY would depend on currently (for 3 months) eating gluten.

DH biopsies have a 37% negative rate. It is a very difficult biopsy, even if it should be positive. It is unknown why it is so highly negative - they say the iga is delicate and it's hard to get a good sample - aside from the rarity of DH (or perhaps that's why it's "rare"?).

I am confused, are you saying being gluten free can not give you a false negative on a DH biopsy? I swear I read that in multiple places.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Well, if going gluten-free gets rid of your rash then yes. However, many people with DH take months if not years to get rid of the rash on a gluten-free diet....

So, as far as I know as long as you have a rash you can have it biopsied. Some rashes are better candidates....but technically it can still be biopsied.

The rash happens where iga is stored in your skin. It can take a while for the iga to dissipate.

ENDOSCOPIES of the small intestine are supposed to be performed while eating gluten.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Kquad Apprentice

Pricklypear,

I checked lots of websites again, many state the skin biopsy must be done while on gluten ( maybe another grey area in this disease). However, i have been on dapsone 2 days, seems to be really helping. They seem smaller and have taken on a purple tint in many areas. The improvement is not uniform and is most noted on the back

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I'd really like to see those links. Could you post them?

Kquad Apprentice

Open Original Shared Link

IgA antibodies must be present in the skin biopsy for a definite diagnosis (4). It is important the person continues to eat gluten as the gluten-free diet can cause false negative results.

Open Original Shared Link

Diagnosis is confirmed by a simple blood test for IgA antibodies,[17] and by a skin biopsy in which the pattern of IgA deposits in the dermal papillae, revealed by direct immunofluorescence, distinguishes it from linear IgA bullous dermatosis[8] and other forms of dermatitis. These tests should be done before the patient starts on a gluten-free diet, otherwise they might produce false negatives. If the patient has already started a gluten-free diet (there is a strong relationship with DH and coeliac sprue), it might be necessary for them to come off it for some weeks before the tests can be done reliably.

[edit]

There were more, but it is midnight.

Goodnight

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Interesting. While I won't argue that a steady supply of iga antibodies would probably be a good thing for a biopsy, the authors seem to be missing the point that iga must still be present to cause the rash.

Iga evidently dissipates quickly for some, slowly for others.... If you still have a rash I'd guess there's plenty of iga.

I wonder if DH dx in the UK has a higher positive rate than in the US, if the guidelines are followed?

I wouldn't necessarily blame your negative/ inconclusive results on a gluten-free diet. Didn't the doc take the biopsies on top of lesions?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - GlorietaKaro replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      3

      Am I nuts?

    2. - trents replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      3

      Am I nuts?

    3. - lalan45 replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      29

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

    4. - Russ H posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      0

      Anti-endomysial Antibody (EMA) Testing

    5. - Scott Adams replied to JoJo0611's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Just diagnosed today

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,806
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    IleneG
    Newest Member
    IleneG
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • GlorietaKaro
      Thanks to both of you for your responses!  Sadly, even after several years of very strict gluten avoidance, I remember the symptoms well enough that I am too frightened to risk a gluten challenge— heartbeat and breathing problems are scary— Scott, thank you for the specific information— I will call around in the new year to see if I can find anyone. In the meantime, I will carry on has I have been— it’s working! Thanks also for the validation— sometimes I just feel crushed by disbelief. Not enough to make me eat gluten though—
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @GlorietaKaro! As Scott indicated, without formal testing for celiac disease, which would require you to have been consuming generous amounts of gluten daily for weeks, it would be not be possible to distinguish whether you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Their symptoms overlap. The difference being that celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the lining of the small bowel. We actually no more about celiac disease than we do about NCGS, the mechanism of the latter being more difficult to classify. There are specific antibody tests for celiac disease diagnosis and there is also the endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining. Currently, there are no tests to diagnose NCGS. Celiac disease must first ruled out. Researchers are working on developing testing methods to diagnose celiac disease that do not require a "gluten challenge" which is just out of the question for so many because it poses serious, even life-threatening, health risks. But we aren't there yet.
    • lalan45
      That’s really frustrating, I’m sorry you went through that. High fiber can definitely cause sudden stomach issues, especially if your body isn’t used to it yet, but accidental gluten exposure can feel similar. Keeping a simple food/symptom journal and introducing new foods one at a time can really help you spot patterns. You’re already doing the right things with cleaning and separating baking—also watch shared toasters, cutting boards, and labels like “may contain.”
    • Russ H
      I thought this might be of interest regarding anti-EMA testing. Some labs use donated umbilical cord instead of monkey oesophagus. Some labs just provide a +ve/-ve test result but others provide a grade by testing progressively diluted blood sample. https://www.aesku.com/index.php/ifu-download/1367-ema-instruction-manual-en-1/file Fluorescence-labelled anti-tTG2 autoantibodies bind to endomysium (the thin layer around muscle fibres) forming a characteristic honeycomb pattern under the microscope - this is highly specific to coeliac disease. The binding site is extracellular tTG2 bound to fibronectin and collagen. Human or monkey derived endomysium is necessary because tTG2 from other mammals does not provide the right binding epitope. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/3/1012
    • Scott Adams
      First, please know that receiving two diagnoses at once, especially one you've never heard of, is undoubtedly overwhelming. You are not alone in this. Your understanding is correct: both celiac disease and Mesenteric Panniculitis (MP) are considered to have autoimmune components. While having both is not extremely common, they can co-occur, as chronic inflammation from one autoimmune condition can sometimes be linked to or trigger other inflammatory responses in the body. MP, which involves inflammation of the fat tissue in the mesentery (the membrane that holds your intestines in place), is often discovered incidentally on scans, exactly as in your case. The fact that your medical team is already planning follow-up with a DEXA scan (to check bone density, common after a celiac diagnosis) and a repeat CT is a very proactive and prudent approach to monitoring your health. Many find that adhering strictly to the gluten-free diet for celiac disease helps manage overall inflammation, which may positively impact MP over time. It's completely normal to feel uncertain right now. Your next steps are to take this one day at a time, focus on the gluten-free diet as your primary treatment for celiac, and use your upcoming appointments to ask all your questions about MP and what the monitoring plan entails. This dual diagnosis is a lot to process, but it is also the starting point for a managed path forward to better health. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.