Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy


Kquad

Recommended Posts

Kquad Apprentice

I went and had a biopsy. I mentioned to the dermatologist, I had been gluten free since march. I said I heard that could give a false negative. He said that was wrong. Also, he seemed to take the 2 biopsies from directly on a lesion. I know have the results back. One was negative. The other could not be read. Should I really take this as a true negative.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



photobuff5959 Newbie

I went and had a biopsy. I mentioned to the dermatologist, I had been gluten free since march. I said I heard that could give a false negative. He said that was wrong. Also, he seemed to take the 2 biopsies from directly on a lesion. I know have the results back. One was negative. The other could not be read. Should I really take this as a true negative.

I'm new to this diagnosis, but my dermatologist knew that the biopsy had to be taken from skin that had not erupted. They have to do an immunofluorescence biopsy. There are other posts in this forum about dermatolgists who understand this and those who don't. I would get a second opinion.

itchy Rookie

My dermatologist consultant in England said emphatically that no test would work unless I maintained a high gluten diet for a couple of weeks before testing. (Why would anyone put themselves through that misery).

Based on previous comments here, that seems to be the experience.

I would find another dermatologist.

Kquad Apprentice

sent links with info about gluten free diet having false negatives and proper biopsy technique. He emailed me back and offered a trial dapsone. Stuff sounds scary a bit. Rash is a bit lighter this week after months. I know it can vary and has, but I may hold off a week. Feel good having a MD reconsider.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

A DH biopsy would not depend on currently eating gluten, just having the DH rash.

An ENDOSCOPY would depend on currently (for 3 months) eating gluten.

DH biopsies have a 37% negative rate. It is a very difficult biopsy, even if it should be positive. It is unknown why it is so highly negative - they say the iga is delicate and it's hard to get a good sample - aside from the rarity of DH (or perhaps that's why it's "rare"?).

Kquad Apprentice

A DH biopsy would not depend on currently eating gluten, just having the DH rash.

An ENDOSCOPY would depend on currently (for 3 months) eating gluten.

DH biopsies have a 37% negative rate. It is a very difficult biopsy, even if it should be positive. It is unknown why it is so highly negative - they say the iga is delicate and it's hard to get a good sample - aside from the rarity of DH (or perhaps that's why it's "rare"?).

I am confused, are you saying being gluten free can not give you a false negative on a DH biopsy? I swear I read that in multiple places.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Well, if going gluten-free gets rid of your rash then yes. However, many people with DH take months if not years to get rid of the rash on a gluten-free diet....

So, as far as I know as long as you have a rash you can have it biopsied. Some rashes are better candidates....but technically it can still be biopsied.

The rash happens where iga is stored in your skin. It can take a while for the iga to dissipate.

ENDOSCOPIES of the small intestine are supposed to be performed while eating gluten.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Kquad Apprentice

Pricklypear,

I checked lots of websites again, many state the skin biopsy must be done while on gluten ( maybe another grey area in this disease). However, i have been on dapsone 2 days, seems to be really helping. They seem smaller and have taken on a purple tint in many areas. The improvement is not uniform and is most noted on the back

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I'd really like to see those links. Could you post them?

Kquad Apprentice

Open Original Shared Link

IgA antibodies must be present in the skin biopsy for a definite diagnosis (4). It is important the person continues to eat gluten as the gluten-free diet can cause false negative results.

Open Original Shared Link

Diagnosis is confirmed by a simple blood test for IgA antibodies,[17] and by a skin biopsy in which the pattern of IgA deposits in the dermal papillae, revealed by direct immunofluorescence, distinguishes it from linear IgA bullous dermatosis[8] and other forms of dermatitis. These tests should be done before the patient starts on a gluten-free diet, otherwise they might produce false negatives. If the patient has already started a gluten-free diet (there is a strong relationship with DH and coeliac sprue), it might be necessary for them to come off it for some weeks before the tests can be done reliably.

[edit]

There were more, but it is midnight.

Goodnight

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Interesting. While I won't argue that a steady supply of iga antibodies would probably be a good thing for a biopsy, the authors seem to be missing the point that iga must still be present to cause the rash.

Iga evidently dissipates quickly for some, slowly for others.... If you still have a rash I'd guess there's plenty of iga.

I wonder if DH dx in the UK has a higher positive rate than in the US, if the guidelines are followed?

I wouldn't necessarily blame your negative/ inconclusive results on a gluten-free diet. Didn't the doc take the biopsies on top of lesions?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,118
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cwbtex
    Newest Member
    Cwbtex
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • captaincrab55
      Hi Colleen H,   I suffered with the pins and needles/burning feeling in my legs and feet for at least  6 years until my Nephrologist figured out that I had to go on a low salt diet.  He said my kidneys weren't strong enough to remove the salt.  The simple fix was a diuretic, but that med leaves the uric acid behind, so that wasn't an option.  On the bright side the low salt diet lowered my BP over 20 points and and the pins and needles/burning feeling went away.  Good Luck and hope this helps.  
    • Colleen H
      Yes this is very frustrating for me ... not sure what to think.  Feels like I'm having reactions to a lot of things  Now applesauce?? I don't understand 😞 
    • Colleen H
      I did ... But aren't we going to be vitamin deficienct if we are not eating due to being sick ?? If the food we eat is gluten free and we have other sensitivities , how do we get out of the cycle??  Thank you 
    • Colleen H
      Anyone else get pins and needles. ??? Burning feeling ? Heat makes it so much worse 😔  Winter is here.  I had to lower my thermostat because I couldn't take that hot air feeling 😔  Hopefully it goes away soon     
    • trents
      I assume that you already know that genetic testing for celiac disease cannot be used to confirm a celiac diagnosis. About 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. It can be used to rule out celiac disease with a high degree of confidence, however, in the case where the genetic testing is negative for the genes. Until and unless you are actually diagnosed with celiac disease I would not raise this as an issue with family. However, if you are diagnosed with celiac disease through blood antibody testing and/or endoscopy with positive biopsy I would suggest you encourage first degree relatives to also purse testing because there is a significant chance (somewhere betwee 10% and almost 50%, depending on which studies you reference) that they will also have or will develop active celiac disease. Often, there are symptoms are absent or very minor until damage to the small bowel lining or other body systems becomes significant so be prepared that they may blow you off. We call this "silent celiac disease". 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.