Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Your Opinions Please :) New To This


taramck324

Recommended Posts

taramck324 Newbie

Hi :) My allergist ran some labs last week and called me saying I had "possible weak positive" results for celiac. I am going to see GI next week but would appreciate any insight! Thanks!!

TTG IGA 4 (negative 0-3, weak positive 4-10, positive 10+)

Immunoglobulin A quant Serum 474 (normal 70-400)

TTG IGG 5 (negative 0-5, weak positive 6-9, positive 9+)

Endomysial Antibody IGA negative

Deamidated gliadin ABS, IGA 18 (negative 0-19, weak positive 20-30, moderate to strong 30+)

Deamidated gliadin ABs, IGG 27 (negative 0-19, weak positive 20-30, moderate to strong 30+)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



samie Contributor

Welcome. Just letting know if you want to get more tests done don't go gluten free yet. Cause it can cause false negatives. Ask questions you want to know I m sure u can get the answers you need. There lots of help on here.

taramck324 Newbie

Thanks! I just am confused by the tests, what does it means if some were weak positive and some were negative?

mushroom Proficient

Hi :) My allergist ran some labs last week and called me saying I had "possible weak positive" results for celiac. I am going to see GI next week but would appreciate any insight! Thanks!!

TTG IGA 4 (negative 0-3, weak positive 4-10, positive 10+)

Immunoglobulin A quant Serum 474 (normal 70-400)

TTG IGG 5 (negative 0-5, weak positive 6-9, positive 9+)

Endomysial Antibody IGA negative

Deamidated gliadin ABS, IGA 18 (negative 0-19, weak positive 20-30, moderate to strong 30+)

Deamidated gliadin ABs, IGG 27 (negative 0-19, weak positive 20-30, moderate to strong 30+)

[/quote]

Hi, and welcome to the board. I am not a testing expert or medical professional, but will give you my thoughts. The two results I have bolded are significant, for different reasons. It is *abnormal* to have a high serum IgA - celiacs more often, if their score is out of range, are too low in IgA. I did some googling and found this reference Open Original Shared Link which indicates a possible association with diabetes, which is also prevalent in those with celiac, so it is an interesting finding that your GI should be able to give you more information on. Maybe you need a fasting glucose test if you haven't had one done lately??? Just a thought.

Your Damidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) (IGG), while in the weakly positive range, is much closer to a positive than a negative. One wonders how long it would be before it went into positive range??? (There are many who regard celiac disease as a progression and much testing information that shows that if you keep testing over the years many negatives eventually become positives - sorry, I don't have a citation to hand for this but will look for one) ETA: here is one: Open Original Shared Link Your DGP IgA was however negative, which is puzzling given that you are a high IgA producer. Normally the IgG results are used if you are a low IgA producer, a factor which invalidates all tests using IgA antibodies. Something else to discuss with your GI.

Your tTG IgA was a weak positive, just over the negative line. However, your tTG IgG was negative and your endomysial antibodies were negative. So what does it all mean????

First of all, you do not have to be positive on every test to be celiac. DGP is the newest of the tests and is considered to be very specific for celiac. I would think that your GI might want to do an endoscopy with biopsies on the basis of this weak positive since it was not *that* weakly positive. I know if it were me, I would want one done based on that finding.

Endomysial antibodies (EMA), before the DGP came along, was always considered to be the most strongly indicative test for celiac. Your tTG results can be high due to other conditions and are not that specific for celiac, although they are specific for antibodies in the gut.

I hope you have a good GI who is familiar with celiac, and I hope he does scope you. Good luck, and keep us informed. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Paula5042
    Newest Member
    Paula5042
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...