Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I Get A Blood Test At All?

Nen

Recommended Posts

Nen Explorer
Nen
Posted

I have not stopped eating gluten yet. I am not sure whether I should pursue getting a blood test first, or just do the diet.

My feeling unsure what to do stems from hearing of others being denied health insurance due to having a "pre-existing" condition of Celiac. Then again, in a few years pre-existing conditions might not matter (depending on what all happens here in the USA with all this healthcare reform battles going on).

Then again, I would know either yes or no based on the blood test, though there is still a margin of error with the current testing.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


eatmeat4good Enthusiast
eatmeat4good
Posted

Testing wasn't a big deal to me. I pondered it for maybe one day. I decided the result would be the same in all cases. I was sick and I thought gluten was my problem. So it didn't make sense to continue to eat something that could be making me very very sick just to be able to let the Dr. tell me to go gluten free. The possible outcomes did not make testing worth it to me. 30% false negatives means you could eat gluten all that time for the test and still test negative and still be sick. The result? I would go gluten free anyway just to find out if it helped. But if I went gluten free immediately I stood the greatest chance for the fastest recovery if this was indeed my problem. It was. The first accidental glutening 4 days into the diet made me extremely ill. Dietary elimination and challenge is 100% accurate. Celiac testing is not. But if you are one of those who won't be able to stay gluten free without a diagnosis...then the testing might be worth it. However, if you are willing to give gluten free a try and be vigilant about observing your symptoms then you could go gluten free and not worry about it. Doesn't bother me if anyone calls me a Celiac or not. I can live like one if I want to.

cbonner Newbie
cbonner
Posted

Good morning NEN:I had the test done and should get my results back today.I had doctor problems getting the test because I don't look like a celiac.Insurance would pay for the test in stages-if test one is positive they would pay for test two ect.My feeling is that if test one is positive then test two is just for the doctor as I was going gluten free no matter what the test show.I guess if you need the results to help you stick with the diet they are worth the money.If feeling better is your goal why not try gluten free for 60 days and let your body decide if this helps you.I'm only five days into my diet;but my bloating is improving and I have more energy.Please try gluten free!Feeling better is worth the effort and the test may or may not show celiac.Let your body and health make the final decision!Charles

Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

I am diagnosed via blood work and biopsy. I was already covered on my health insurance for 5 years before I was diagnosed. I have never had a problem with any insurance I have had through employers with preexisting conditions. However, I have never been without coverage so that may make a difference too.

There are things a diagnosis could be good for. Some insurance policies won't pay for certain things without a qualifing diagnosis/symptom. Regular vitamin/mineral checks, bone mineral densitiy testing, additional scopes, screening for other autoimmune disorders, etc. may get those things done sooner and covered. Just food for thought. However, you have to make the decision that is best for your. Good luck and welcome.

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

The problem with insurance arises if you ever have tp take out individual insurance, rather than be covered by an employer's policy. With individual insurance everything counts against you, even high blood pressure controlled by medication. So if you foresee in your future being self-employed and single,or a partner of someone who has individual health insurance, a diagnosis of celiac could be a problem, because I don't believe anyone in the U.S. should be without health insurance. And I have no idea what is going to happen with ObamaCare.:rolleyes:

Only you can decide if you can live without a diagnosis. Of course, you may be forced to live without a diagnosis if you belong in the 20--30% who test negative for celiac, but are gluten intolerant nonethelessll. Being intolerant of gluten and testing positive for celiac, unfortunately, are two different paradigms. But the treatment for each is the same - a gluten free diet. So you must decide if you need someone to tell you to stop eating gluten, or if you can tell yourself to stop eating gluten. The testing is not necessarily going to tell you yes or no. What will you do if it is negative? Continue to eat gluten? Or give yourself a chance to be well and stop?

Again, I am not telling you what to do, but I believe these are the things you should consider.

By the way, I love your screen name - that was my nickname as a child, in fact what I called myself because I couldn't pronounce my name. :D

Nen Explorer
Nen
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all for the replies, it is food for thought. The kicker is that I do not have insurance already, so I could be shooting myself in the foot if it was diagnosed and I am not on insurance.

Sometimes I *really* hate the USA's healthcare system, its like you are punished for being a human. That though could be a whole other thread!

Aly1 Contributor
Aly1
Posted

I had not even thought of the health insurance angle when I got tested. I am out of work and have no insurance - this is the first time I've been glad my test was negative despite my symptoms!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.