Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Maybe?

sdanger

Recommended Posts

sdanger Newbie
sdanger
Posted

I recently went in to have a celiac panel, and the doctor, without going into too much detail, made a mockery of my thinking I am celiac. I've been told I have everything from a brain tumor (without any CT scan or evidence at all), to a hole in my heart (which an EKG resolved), and also that I just had fibromyalgia and would have to live with taking aspirin everyday.

Well, I argued that it would make sense to start with simple things such as diet first, before continuing to jump to such extremes, especially since I am no longer insured.

My symptoms include:

migraines

sickness up to vomiting after eating

fatty stools (and only able to go about once a week)

embarrassing gas after eating breads

brittle bones (have broken several over the years)

hypoglycemia

bone and joint pain

brain fog

short term memory loss

sensitive teeth

sharp pains around stomach after eating

thinning hair and hair loss

easy bruising

mouth ulcers

pins and needles in toes, fingers, and sometimes lips

depression and irritability

Unable to gain much weight (stopped growing completely by 7th grade, and have stayed around the same weight since)

Anyway, these are some of the symptoms that led me to believe it could be celiac and I could be tested.

The lab results I was sent read:

Tiss Transglutamin IgA <3

Anti- Gliaddin IgA Ab <3

IgA 183

I received no explanation from the doctor other than its normal and I should stop eating gluten for a few weeks. I'm not sure what any of it means, since the doctor also ridiculed me for not going off gluten before my test, saying I should have done that first and if I felt better I wouldn't have had any reason to come in.

Needless to say, I've been off gluten for about 3 weeks now, and within the first 3 days had noticed a tremendous difference. I could concentrate again, my muscle and joint pains have nearly diminished, and I do not feel nauseous or gassy after eating.

However, I now have a sharp stabbing pain around where my stomach is located immediately following eating.

Is it possible I am celiac even though the doctor said it was all normal? I'm thinking about going for a second opinion since the first guy was such a jerk to begin with. Is a biopsy necessary even though I already feel extremely better since getting off gluten?

Sorry about so much detail. I'm determined to finally know what is wrong with me.

Thank you,

Stacey

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Yes it is possible to have celiac and have negative blood tests. At least your doctor advised you to try the diet, none of my ever even mentioned it.

It sounds like you are getting good results with the diet. Some of us do have additional intolerance with soy and casien (dairy) being the most common.

If you can go with whole foods for a while and then after you have been feeling better for a while add back in soy products and then dairy for a week each. If the pain doesn't return you can keep them in.

For me soy causes the type of pain you are having but that may not be the case for you.

Oh and I would find a new doctor as your doctor sounds less then ideal. To worry someone about a brain tumor with no tests to back it up is irresponsible IMHO. Sublingual B12 may help with the tingles and many of us are low in that. If your doctor will run full vitamin and mineral panels to make sure you are not low in other nutrients that would be helpful.

Kamma Explorer
Kamma
Posted

In addition to what Ravenwood said, there is also evidence now for Non Celiac Gluten Intolerance/Sensitivity which does not show up on the testing that they do for celiac. You might find this article helpful which highlights Dr. Fasano's (University of Maryland Centre for Celiac Research) research and validation for NCGI.

Open Original Shared Link

and...if you decide to stay with that doctor, print it out or better yet go to the research journal itself and print out the whole study, and bang the doctor over the head with it with the admonishment and ridicule that he really, really should stay on top of the latest research. (I am soooo NOT a fan of doctors).

Aly1 Contributor
Aly1
Posted

I agree with the previous posters but did want to add that if you think you might want to get a biopsy done you must keep eating gluten until that test is completed...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.