Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With Diagnosis

mderoc

Recommended Posts

mderoc Newbie
mderoc
Posted

Hi! I need some experienced opinions regarding my son. He is one and had an endoscopy due to severe reflux that two meds were not helping. He was born 5 weeks early and had colic, reflux and general irritability. He has never had a solid poop in his life. He was tested for food allergies at 6 months and came up positive to every food (fruit, veggie and grain) that I was feeding him - yes there was gluten in his cereal! The docs suspected EE and put him in a diet of only neonate for two and half months. His scope showed blunting of the villi with while blood cells (lymph-something) both consistent with celiac and his IGA was borderline low. The GI ordered bloodwork to check for Celiac and all the bloodwork came back negative. Therefore he concluded that he did NOT have celiac. My pediatrician and allergist both disagree and are diagnosing him with celiac and sending me to Childrens Hospital of Penn for a second opinion. Does this sound right? I do believe that my son has celiac as he has responded extremely well to the gluten-free diet and his reflux seems to be improving. I do not have celiac but have the genetic markers for gluten intolerance however my son does not. When I asked the GI what the biopsy means he didn't have an answer but it is not "normal". Am I on a wild goose chase to get the correct diagnosis? I understand it is very hard to diagnose this and my son is only one and has not had a lot of gluten so maybe that's why the bloodwork is neg? Any comments are welcome... I feel like this is my answer however I can't understand why the GI doc is not acknowledging it? Thanks!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Cara in Boston Enthusiast
Cara in Boston
Posted

I'm no doctor, but blunting of the villi IS CELIAC. The blood tests - especially in young children - are not accurate and frequently show a false positive. The fact that he felt better gluten free should make it perfectly clear. Glad you have your pediatrician on your side and good for you for not just assuming that the doctor is right. Our first GI said my son didn't need a endoscopy because his blood tests were "unclear" and his genetic markers indicated a "low" possibility. We took him to Children's Hospital of Boston (because the previous doctor had no explanation for the "unclear" blood tests) and he had the scope and was found to have extensive Celiac damage. He is now gluten free and feeling great. Don't give up.

- and you can always keep him gluten free (after the testing is complete) no matter what the doctor says . . .

Trust your instincts.

Cara

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,353
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    ace14219
    Newest Member
    ace14219
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Is it gluten?

      By par18 · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      nothing has changed

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Is it gluten?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      Trip to Anaheim/Disney

      By Seaperky · Posted

      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Churley · Posted

      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.