Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Question


mderoc

Recommended Posts

mderoc Newbie

I'll keep this short and sweet. My son had a biopsy (resulting from severe reflux) which showed blunted villi and lymphocytes however his blood tests were negative with the exception of low IGA and IGG. The GI said it was nothing to worry about and to resume a normal diet. Since going gluten-free my son has solid poops and is much happier. We are even weaning him off one of his reflux meds. The pediatrician diagnosed him with celiac and is sending me for a second opinion. My question is: what is a "positive biopsy"? What exactly does it show? I understand the bloodwork is not accurate in making a diagnosis but what does the biopsy have to show for it to be celiac? Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

I'll keep this short and sweet. My son had a biopsy (resulting from severe reflux) which showed blunted villi and lymphocytes however his blood tests were negative with the exception of low IGA and IGG. The GI said it was nothing to worry about and to resume a normal diet. Since going gluten-free my son has solid poops and is much happier. We are even weaning him off one of his reflux meds. The pediatrician diagnosed him with celiac and is sending me for a second opinion. My question is: what is a "positive biopsy"? What exactly does it show? I understand the bloodwork is not accurate in making a diagnosis but what does the biopsy have to show for it to be celiac? Thanks!

Blunted Villi is pretty much an indicator for Celiac (although other causes, Celiac is primary), coupled with positive dietary result from the diet are diagnostic.

How long was your son gluten free when the blood test was take? Being gluten free will result in inaccurate testing.

Is there a family history with digestive issues, diabetes, fibro...?

Back again...Also blood testing is not always accurate in children under the age of 5.

mderoc Newbie

Blunted Villi is pretty much an indicator for Celiac (although other causes, Celiac is primary), coupled with positive dietary result from the diet are diagnostic.

How long was your son gluten free when the blood test was take? Being gluten free will result in inaccurate testing.

Is there a family history with digestive issues, diabetes, fibro...?

He was not gluten-free at the time of the testing.

I tested positive to one of the gluten intolerant markers but neg for celiac and my biopsy was neg. I know it's from my side of the family though.. I have a celiac aunt. I have chronic bouts of diarrhea which lead to my biopsy but that was neg. I also have two other older siblings and I wonder about getting them tested. My oldest has chronic constipation, complains of stomach aches and in six year old lingo "burps into her mouth" which I suspect is acid reflux.

So do you think the shortened villi is enough coupled with a positive response to the gluten-free diet is enough to diagnose? Also, what else can cause the blunting of the villi?

Lisa Mentor

He was not gluten-free at the time of the testing.

I tested positive to one of the gluten intolerant markers but neg for celiac and my biopsy was neg. I know it's from my side of the family though.. I have a celiac aunt. I have chronic bouts of diarrhea which lead to my biopsy but that was neg. I also have two other older siblings and I wonder about getting them tested. My oldest has chronic constipation, complains of stomach aches and in six year old lingo "burps into her mouth" which I suspect is acid reflux.

So do you think the shortened villi is enough coupled with a positive response to the gluten-free diet is enough to diagnose? Also, what else can cause the blunting of the villi?

With your family history, a positive biopsy and positive dietary response ----that's three out of the four criteria.

It appears that you have your answer.

Also, it recommended that you (they) go off dairy for a month or two. Almond milk would be my choice. After some healing takes place, cows milk can be often re-introduced successfully.

There are other causes of blunted villi, but very rare. Gluten it the major cause, as in conjunction with your childs symptoms.

frieze Community Regular

He was not gluten-free at the time of the testing.

I tested positive to one of the gluten intolerant markers but neg for celiac and my biopsy was neg. I know it's from my side of the family though.. I have a celiac aunt. I have chronic bouts of diarrhea which lead to my biopsy but that was neg. I also have two other older siblings and I wonder about getting them tested. My oldest has chronic constipation, complains of stomach aches and in six year old lingo "burps into her mouth" which I suspect is acid reflux.

So do you think the shortened villi is enough coupled with a positive response to the gluten-free diet is enough to diagnose? Also, what else can cause the blunting of the villi?

I'm thinkin', you're lookin' at, a gluten free household....

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

I'll keep this short and sweet. My son had a biopsy (resulting from severe reflux) which showed blunted villi and lymphocytes however his blood tests were negative with the exception of low IGA and IGG. The GI said it was nothing to worry about and to resume a normal diet. Since going gluten-free my son has solid poops and is much happier. We are even weaning him off one of his reflux meds. The pediatrician diagnosed him with celiac and is sending me for a second opinion. My question is: what is a "positive biopsy"? What exactly does it show? I understand the bloodwork is not accurate in making a diagnosis but what does the biopsy have to show for it to be celiac? Thanks!

Having a low IGA and IGG would make the blood tests inaccurate. The biopsy shows villi damage, which would suggest Celiac, along with him doing better off it.

Dairy and soy intolerance can cause villi damage, along with a few other things, but gluten is the most common cause.

https://www.celiac.com/articles/50/1/Main-Causes-of-Flattened-Villi/Page1.html

Skylark Collaborator

He was not gluten-free at the time of the testing.

I tested positive to one of the gluten intolerant markers but neg for celiac and my biopsy was neg. I know it's from my side of the family though.. I have a celiac aunt. I have chronic bouts of diarrhea which lead to my biopsy but that was neg. I also have two other older siblings and I wonder about getting them tested. My oldest has chronic constipation, complains of stomach aches and in six year old lingo "burps into her mouth" which I suspect is acid reflux.

So do you think the shortened villi is enough coupled with a positive response to the gluten-free diet is enough to diagnose? Also, what else can cause the blunting of the villi?

What test was positive? The only test that might be positive without you being celiac is the old anti-gliadin IgA. Biopsies can miss patchy damage so you may be celiac. I hope you're strictly gluten-free.

As for your son, have your doctors said anything about common variable immune deficiency (CVID)? Celiac is a common misdiagnosis because one of the symptoms is villous atrophy. It's possible he's celiac and gluten-free may help, but you need to talk to your doctor about a follow-up biopsy after he's been on the diet for a while, especially if symptoms continue. You may also want to ask for a referral to an immunologist.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mderoc Newbie

What test was positive? The only test that might be positive without you being celiac is the old anti-gliadin IgA. Biopsies can miss patchy damage so you may be celiac. I hope you're strictly gluten-free.

As for your son, have your doctors said anything about common variable immune deficiency (CVID)? Celiac is a common misdiagnosis because one of the symptoms is villous atrophy. It's possible he's celiac and gluten-free may help, but you need to talk to your doctor about a follow-up biopsy after he's been on the diet for a while, especially if symptoms continue. You may also want to ask for a referral to an immunologist.

Thanks for the helpful info. I actually went back and looked at the bloodwork for myself and my son. MMy DQ2 was a "partial positive" and my iron is low.. could I really have celiac?

Also, I called my son's doc and obtained the copy of the biopsy which states "the villi are blunted 50% and there is spotty intraepithelial lymphocytosis whicy by itself would suggest celiac disease. Clinical correlation is required." So since his DQ2 and DQ8 are negative the GI diagnosed him with NOTHING!!! How can this be? Also I read that with CVID your symptoms will not improve on gluten-free diet and my son has improved greatly. Is this accurate?

Thanks again!

Skylark Collaborator

Gotcha! I thought you meant an antibody test. DQ2 increases risk for celiac, but is not diagnostic because something like 30% of the US population has a DQ2 gene. The low iron is something a lot of us get, but it can come with inflammation from gluten intolerance too. There are false negatives on testing but you're probably gluten intolerant rather than celiac. Gluten can still make you miserable!

I think you're right about CVID and not improving gluten-free. It sure sounds like a celiac biopsy. Not having DQ2 or DQ8 does NOT rule out celiac disease. Something like 1-2% of celiacs do not have a "celiac" gene. IgA deficiency is a risk factor for celiac too. I think the second Dr. who said he's celiac is right.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,025
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amari Love
    Newest Member
    Amari Love
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.