Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Help On My Blood Test Results

BrewlessInTheBay

Recommended Posts

BrewlessInTheBay Newbie
BrewlessInTheBay
Posted

Hi all,

I got blood results recently and it seems like I had one positive test and one negative test. Does anyone know how likely I am to have Celiac based on this info? My doctor wasn't helpful in assessing this. I am getting an Endo next week which I assume will confirm whether I have it?

Here are the test results:

Component Your result Standard range Units

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE IgG 1.13 < 0.90 - Index

Tissue transglutaminase IgA 0.32 < 0.90 - Index

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Hello, and welcome.

They performed the two versions of the tTG test, the IgA and the IgG versions. IgA and IgG are two types of autoimmune antibodies that your body makes when it is unhappy with gluten. Oftentimes they only run the IgA version and run a test called total serum IgA (as a control) to make sure your body produces 'normal' amounts of IgA (everybody produces some). If the total IgA is insufficient overall they run the IgG version of the tTG test. In your case your doctor just automatically asked for both versions. The fact that your IgG was positive and IgA negative probably means you do not produce normal IgA amounts. Either way, a positive test is a positive test and I believe you can consider that you have celiac disease. Hopefully you will get a definitive answer with the biopsy. Make sure that they take at least six samples because the damage is not uniform throughout the small intestine. And there can still be a false negative on the biopsy. So you should give the gluten free diet a strict three-month trial regardless of whether the biopsy is positive or negative.

BrewlessInTheBay Newbie
BrewlessInTheBay
Posted
  • Author

Wow that is such awesome info. Way better than my doctor's explanation! Just a quick follow up, do most Celliacs see postiive tests on both IgA and IgG, or is it possible to get a positive IgG and a negative IgA and stll be a Celiac?

Also with regard to to six samples, I just mention to my doctor before the test?

Thanks so much!

Hello, and welcome.

They performed the two versions of the tTG test, the IgA and the IgG versions. IgA and IgG are two types of autoimmune antibodies that your body makes when it is unhappy with gluten. Oftentimes they only run the IgA version and run a test called total serum IgA (as a control) to make sure your body produces 'normal' amounts of IgA (everybody produces some). If the total IgA is insufficient overall they run the IgG version of the tTG test. In your case your doctor just automatically asked for both versions. The fact that your IgG was positive and IgA negative probably means you do not produce normal IgA amounts. Either way, a positive test is a positive test and I believe you can consider that you have celiac disease. Hopefully you will get a definitive answer with the biopsy. Make sure that they take at least six samples because the damage is not uniform throughout the small intestine. And there can still be a false negative on the biopsy. So you should give the gluten free diet a strict three-month trial regardless of whether the biopsy is positive or negative.

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Yes, it is perfectly possible for one to be positive and the other negative. There are a whole series of tests (the 'panel') that have been developed for celiac disease, and you need only be positive on one of them.

And you don't just 'mention' to the doctor, you "insist" :D (in a nice way, of course).

jnh380 Rookie
jnh380
Posted

Hi Brewless, I see you have just gotten results from Kaiser, as I just got similar results from then a few weeks ago. The .90 reference range is the giveaway (that and you live in the bay).

The previous posters are correct in that the IGG steps in when you are IGA deficient. For me the numbers were reversed, IGA was 1.56 and IGG was .35. I just had a biopsy endoscopy this monday and am waiting on the results. Have you scheduled one? I dont remember anything about it so its nothing to fear.

I wish Kaiser was a bit more interactive, so far I have only gotten small amounts of information from them. I will let you know what happens with the biopsy results. Welcome to the suspected but not proven Celiac club!

BrewlessInTheBay Newbie
BrewlessInTheBay
Posted
  • Author

Hi Brewless, I see you have just gotten results from Kaiser, as I just got similar results from then a few weeks ago. The .90 reference range is the giveaway (that and you live in the bay).

The previous posters are correct in that the IGG steps in when you are IGA deficient. For me the numbers were reversed, IGA was 1.56 and IGG was .35. I just had a biopsy endoscopy this monday and am waiting on the results. Have you scheduled one? I dont remember anything about it so its nothing to fear.

I wish Kaiser was a bit more interactive, so far I have only gotten small amounts of information from them. I will let you know what happens with the biopsy results. Welcome to the suspected but not proven Celiac club!

Hey,

TOTALLY AGREE. I can't get an answer from anyone! From I what understand a positive IGA is more likely to be Celiac than an IGG. I had the biopsy as well and am waiting for results! I will let you know!

beachbirdie Contributor
beachbirdie
Posted

Hey,

TOTALLY AGREE. I can't get an answer from anyone! From I what understand a positive IGA is more likely to be Celiac than an IGG. I had the biopsy as well and am waiting for results! I will let you know!

I'm very interested to hear your biopsy results! Like you, I tested positive in the ttg igg, and negative on everything else. It's not common to test this way, I've heard!

Haven't figured out what to do yet. I just sent my result to my doctor (I didn't go through her for testing) and am waiting to hear what she says.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ziva Newbie
Ziva
Posted

On Friday, I went with my 21 y/o daughter to her 3 week after endoscopy follow up appt. The doctor totally changed his diagnosis from "classic Celiac" after our initial appt and endoscoy findings to No to Celiac because "the Golden Standard" of biopsy was not met. He now says the ttg IgG result that was 9.3 was not really high. (<6 neg, 6-9 - weak positive and >9 positive) Only test she showed high. Looking back, I don't see where they did the IgA quantity. Can I say we are VERY frustrated! He didn't seem to take into account that she seems to feel better 3 weeks gluten free. No ear infections, decreased bowel problems, more regular bm without added fiber to name a few things. Also had no explaination for her anemia. He is now going with IBS and wants her to take lubiprostone / amitiza and do a stool test for blood. Also said she should "modify" her carbs but doesn't have to eliminate them. It looks like that medication could have some unpleasant side effects! Anyone else take that medication?

Any input?

I'm thinking she is going to skip the medication for now and continue eating gluten free. Right? Do the poop test for blood. Is 2 months eating gluten free long enough to see changes in blood work for anemia?

So frustrating! Good luck to the other posters on this thread regarding your results. Seems like you really have to go with how you react to foods because you may not get confirmation from the doctors.

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

On Friday, I went with my 21 y/o daughter to her 3 week after endoscopy follow up appt. The doctor totally changed his diagnosis from "classic Celiac" after our initial appt and endoscoy findings to No to Celiac because "the Golden Standard" of biopsy was not met. He now says the ttg IgG result that was 9.3 was not really high. (<6 neg, 6-9 - weak positive and >9 positive) Only test she showed high. Looking back, I don't see where they did the IgA quantity. Can I say we are VERY frustrated! He didn't seem to take into account that she seems to feel better 3 weeks gluten free. No ear infections, decreased bowel problems, more regular bm without added fiber to name a few things. Also had no explaination for her anemia. He is now going with IBS and wants her to take lubiprostone / amitiza and do a stool test for blood. Also said she should "modify" her carbs but doesn't have to eliminate them. It looks like that medication could have some unpleasant side effects! Anyone else take that medication?

Any input?

I'm thinking she is going to skip the medication for now and continue eating gluten free. Right? Do the poop test for blood. Is 2 months eating gluten free long enough to see changes in blood work for anemia?

So frustrating! Good luck to the other posters on this thread regarding your results. Seems like you really have to go with how you react to foods because you may not get confirmation from the doctors.

You got that one right, Ziva. That is really the final test - does it make her feel better? If it does, then you have your answer - she should not eat gluten. Doesn't matter what the tests say. You tried your best to extract a diagnosis, he chooses to ignore the positive blood result and go with the biopsy which depends on the skill of the GI and the pathologist, and put her on medication!! I am not familiar with those meds but I assume neither one of them is addressing her iron deficiency? It is going to take her quite a while to heal enough to start absorbing iron if it is due to celiac, unfortunately.

I share your frustration. Do do the stool blood test, if only to show him, and do keep her gluten free, steady as she goes :)

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast
Bubba's Mom
Posted

A little positive? So...she's supposed to go her merry way and come back when the damage is more? :o

I hope she stays gluten-free. As she heals her iron levels will come up.

Dr.s make me crazy! When they know a test isn't 100% accurate, and continuing to eat gluten when your body is intolerant of it, can cause more damage, they don't err on the side of caution..they say go ahead and eat it? :blink:

I guess that keeps them in business with a steady stream of sick patients?

Cara in Boston Enthusiast
Cara in Boston
Posted

Just wanted to add that my son (7) was negative on all the IgA tests (but not total IgA - that was sufficient) but positive on the IgG tests. His biopsy was positive.

I had positive blood tests and negative biopsy. My doctor diagnosed me with "gluten intolerance" instead of celiac because of the negative biopsy. My son's doctor (who seems more knowledgeable) said that was silly. I just didn't have any damage yet . . . no reason to continue eating gluten just to create damage that can be measured. A positive blood test is enough to tell you to stop eating gluten.

Been gluten-free for a year now and feel great . . .

Cara

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

I just want to comment that the ttg test is specifically developed to look for total villous atrophy, or lots of tissue damage, so a weak positive does mean there is a lot of tissue damage. Biopsies can miss the celia lesions.

Celiac nowadays is typically the patchy kind, so a negative biopsy does not say much. They just missed the spots.

There was a study recently about biospy practices in the U.S, and the places where they follow guidelines and take more biopsy samples, have double the number of celiac diagnosis compared to those places where they only take one or two samples.

jnh380 Rookie
jnh380
Posted

Hey,

TOTALLY AGREE. I can't get an answer from anyone! From I what understand a positive IGA is more likely to be Celiac than an IGG. I had the biopsy as well and am waiting for results! I will let you know!

Brewless- I got my biopsy results and they came back positive. Looks like I definately have celiac. Hope you get the answer you are looking for.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Sarah Grace's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      26

      Headaches / Migraines and Hypoglycaemia

      This article does not address migraines at all. Yes, red wine and sulfites are often mentioned in connection with migraine triggers. With me, any kind of alcoholic beverage in very modest amounts will reliably produce a migraine. Nitrous oxide generators, which are vaso dialators, also will give me migraines reliably. So, I think most of my migraines...
    2. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to Sarah Grace's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      26

      Headaches / Migraines and Hypoglycaemia

      Excessive dietary tyrosine can cause problems. Everything in moderation. Sulfites can also trigger migraines. Sulfites are found in fermented, pickled and aged foods, like cheese. Sulfites cause a high histamine release. High histamine levels are found in migraine. Following a low histamine diet like the low histamine Autoimmune Protocol diet,...
    3. trents
      - trents replied to Sarah Grace's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      26

      Headaches / Migraines and Hypoglycaemia

      Then we would need to cut out all meat and fish as they are richer sources of tyrosine than nuts and cheese. Something else about certain tyrosine rich foods must be the actual culprit.
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Russ H's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      KAN-101 Treatment for Coeliac Disease

      I agree that KAN-101 looks promising, and hope the fast track is approved. From our article below: "KAN-101 shows promise as an immune tolerance therapy aiming to retrain the immune system, potentially allowing safe gluten exposure in the future, but more clinical data is needed to confirm long-term effects."
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to miguel54b's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Body dysmorphia experience

      Thank you so much for having the courage to share this incredibly vivid and personal experience; it's a powerful reminder of how physical ailments can disrupt our fundamental sense of self. What you're describing sounds less like a purely psychological body dysmorphia and more like a distinct neurological event, likely triggered by the immense physical stress...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,152
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    denise.milillo
    Newest Member
    denise.milillo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Headaches / Migraines and Hypoglycaemia

      By trents · Posted

      This article does not address migraines at all.  Yes, red wine and sulfites are often mentioned in connection with migraine triggers. With me, any kind of alcoholic beverage in very modest amounts will reliably produce a migraine. Nitrous oxide generators, which are vaso dialators, also will give me migraines reliably. So, I think most of my migraines are tied to fluctuations vascular tension and blood flow to the brain. That's why the sumatriptan works so well. It is a vaso constrictor. 
    • knitty kitty
      Headaches / Migraines and Hypoglycaemia

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Excessive dietary tyrosine can cause problems.  Everything in moderation.   Sulfites can also trigger migraines. Sulfites are found in fermented, pickled and aged foods, like cheese.  Sulfites cause a high histamine release.  High histamine levels are found in migraine.  Following a low histamine diet like the low histamine Autoimmune Protocol diet, a Paleo diet, helps immensely.    Sulfites and other migraine trigger foods can cause changes in the gut microbiome.  These bad bacteria can increase the incidence of migraines, increasing histamine and inflammation leading to increased gut permeability (leaky gut), SIBO, and higher systemic inflammation.   A Ketogenic diet can reduce the incidence of migraine.  A Paleo diet like the AIP diet, that restricts carbohydrates (like from starchy vegetables) becomes a ketogenic diet.  This diet also changes the microbiome, eliminating the bad bacteria and SIBO that cause an increase in histamine, inflammation and migraine.  Fewer bad bacteria reduces inflammation, lowers migraine frequency, and improves leaky gut. Since I started following the low histamine ketogenic AIP paleo diet, I rarely get migraine.  Yes, I do eat carbs occasionally now, rice or potato, but still no migraines.  Feed your body right, feed your intestinal bacteria right, you'll feel better.  Good intestinal bacteria actually make your mental health better, too.  I had to decide to change my diet drastically in order to feel better all the time, not just to satisfy my taste buds.  I chose to eat so I would feel better all the time.  I do like dark chocolate (a migraine trigger), but now I can indulge occasionally without a migraine after.   Microbiota alterations are related to migraine food triggers and inflammatory markers in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11546420/  
    • trents
      Headaches / Migraines and Hypoglycaemia

      By trents · Posted

      Then we would need to cut out all meat and fish as they are richer sources of tyrosine than nuts and cheese. Something else about certain tyrosine rich foods must be the actual culprit. 
    • Scott Adams
      KAN-101 Treatment for Coeliac Disease

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I agree that KAN-101 looks promising, and hope the fast track is approved. From our article below: "KAN-101 shows promise as an immune tolerance therapy aiming to retrain the immune system, potentially allowing safe gluten exposure in the future, but more clinical data is needed to confirm long-term effects."  
    • Scott Adams
      Body dysmorphia experience

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Thank you so much for having the courage to share this incredibly vivid and personal experience; it's a powerful reminder of how physical ailments can disrupt our fundamental sense of self. What you're describing sounds less like a purely psychological body dysmorphia and more like a distinct neurological event, likely triggered by the immense physical stress and inflammation that uncontrolled celiac disease can inflict on the entire body, including the nervous system. It makes complete sense that the specific sensory input—the pressure points of your elbows on your knees—created a temporary, distorted body map in your brain, and the fact that it ceased once you adopted a gluten-free diet is a crucial detail. Your intuition to document this is absolutely right; it's not "crazy" but rather a significant anecdotal data point that underscores the mysterious and far-reaching ways gluten can affect individuals. Your theory about sensory triggers from the feet for others is also a thoughtful insight, and sharing this story could indeed be validating for others who have had similar, unexplainable sensory disturbances, helping them feel less alone in their journey.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.