Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Is Best?


Mommyof4beans

Recommended Posts

Mommyof4beans Newbie

Hello,

I posted previously about my symptoms and history of Lupus. I have a a GI apt at the end of this month. My question- do people start the diet without every getting an official diagnoses and if so, are there any health dangers in that?

My husband would like me to continue the diet, but if there is a risk, I would rather wait. He is also afraid it might take a lot of time to get an official diagnoses. I hope this makes sense.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

If you aren't eating gluten, it will be hard to get a Celiac diagnosis, if you have Celiac. You don't make antibodies to gluten if there is no gluten.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You need to stay on gluten until all testing is done for the best chance of a accurate result. However if you have been strictly gluten free you may react strongly to adding it back in. Your regular doctor can order the celiac panel so that is waiting for the GI appt. If you haven't been gluten-free very long then there is a chance it will still be positive. If you have children it can be important to get a diagnosis since they also need to be tested, whether they have symptoms or not, if you are celiac.

Mommyof4beans Newbie

You need to stay on gluten until all testing is done for the best chance of a accurate result. However if you have been strictly gluten free you may react strongly to adding it back in. Your regular doctor can order the celiac panel so that is waiting for the GI appt. If you haven't been gluten-free very long then there is a chance it will still be positive. If you have children it can be important to get a diagnosis since they also need to be tested, whether they have symptoms or not, if you are celiac.

Thank you for your responses. It's only been 3 days. :)

GFinDC Veteran

Right, the blood antibodies will be reduced if you stop eating gluten. The endoscopy may still pick up some damage if they get the reight spot on the biopsy. But it may not also. The only risk is that by starting the gluten-free diet before the testing that your testing will be inaccurate. It is possible you will get inaccurate results since you have been gluten-free already.

GottaSki Mentor

Once gluten is removed getting diagnosed with Celiac becomes harder (it is not an easy process to begin with). I can think of two major reasons to get a diagnosis:

1) already mentioned: if you have children it is important for them to be tested if you have Celiac Disease. Many symptoms of Celiac go unnoticed or are simply dismissed because it's just a little of this or a little of that. With Celiac Disease those small symptoms will continue to cause worse health problems as time goes on. There are also "Silent Celiacs" with no symptoms but the damage to the intestine has already begun - far better to get those with a genetic link tested, then wait for their bodies to become damaged. Children can often have even a tougher time getting a diagnosis than adults, so getting them tested periodically is wise. If symptoms are present and blood tests are negative, trial them on a gluten-free diet for at least 3 months to monitor symptoms.

2) some are fortunate to have major health improvement within the first days or months of removing gluten, but there are those of us - often the ones that went undiagnosed or misdiagnosed for many years - that take years to heal. There may be some improvement by removing gluten and then little or no improvement for days, weeks, months and even years. It is very difficult to be completely gluten free - I know there were many days for me that I had difficulty believing gluten was the root of my problem -- had I not had a diagnosis I don't know that I would have been as careful or diligent about staying gluten-free.

While you can certainly remove gluten without a diagnosis, I strongly suggest getting your blood work done minimally. Once gluten free, you lose the opportunity to get those initial results - which may become very valuable to you in monitoring your health.

Good Luck to you :)

Mommyof4beans Newbie

Thank you all so much for your responses. I talked it over with my husband and I have decided to back to eating normal until I am tested. :) Gottaski, you put exactly how I feel into words about my children. I don't want to never know if I have it or not. Especially when it comes to the health of my kiddos and me being healthy for my kids.

My son has severe autism and he relies on me and my hubby to take care of him. :)

I will stay posted.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

Right there with you...my kid's symptoms hurt me worse than my major ones - every time.

Glad you found us...keep asking questions...we have all gone through this and know how frustrating the diagnosis and tough the transition.

I hope your diagnosis goes quickly. Often you can call your primary to get all the blood tests. If they come back positive you may be able to get processed into gastroenterology quicker - thereby shortening the wait to remove gluten. With your symptoms I do think you should remove gluten for 3-6 months regardless of test results.

Good luck to you and your family!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      nothing has changed

    2. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    4. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    5. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.