Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Six Month Followup


Chuck1004

Recommended Posts

Chuck1004 Apprentice

Hi all -

I posted on these boards six months ago when diagnosed with Celiac. In preparation for my six month followup I got the blood work done in advance of the appointment and I have a concern as I sit here a week out. I'm hoping you can help!

First of all, I went to the GI doc initially because of an elevated ALT enzyme level. They did the Celiac test on a whim. I was shocked when they told me I had it.

These were my results from six months ago:

Iga was 261, with normal range 69-309.

Ttg iga was 45.62, with normal of 0-15.

Ttg igg was 4.62 and negative.

AMA was negative.

SMA was negative.

ANA was positive at 1:40, negative above that, and speckled. Normally negative at 1:40.

Fatty liver.

ALT to 55. Normal range 0-55 at that hospital, but my hospital's range 0-40. I've been as high as 73. This is what brought me to them.

Antitrypsin deficiency carrier.

They did a biopsy and here were the results there.

"Final Pathologic Diagnosis:

A. Duodenum Biopsy - Duodenal mucosa with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and normal villous architecture; (see note)

Note: A CD3 immunostain demonstrates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes throughout most of the architecturally preserve villi. Although non-specific, in conjunction with the known positive serum IgA TTG, the findings support a diagnosis of celiac disease.

Gross Description - Received in formalin, is .4 x .3 x.1 cm aggregate of tissue fragments. Entirely in A1."

And so we throw out the pots and pans, bury the toaster in the back yard, and I've made it my goal in life not to come into contact with a molecule of gluten anything for the past six months. These are the blood test results I get back this week in preparation for my appointment.

Iga was 239, with normal range 66-436.

Ttg iga was <1.2, with normal of <4.

Ttg igg was 4.62 and negative.

ALT to 54. Normal range 0-35 at that hospital.

So of course, with the ALT still high and the TTG iga at normal after six months, I am hoping I was not misdiagnosed with Celiac six months ago. Is it normal for that level to drop so suddenly and can the ALT still remain elevated? Any words of wisdom would be most helpful!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

I can tell you that my ALT was only slightly elevated at diagnosis - low 40s with 0-35 range. At six months it had not lowered, but was in the twenties after a year and has remained there for the past two years.

My tTG IgA had dropped from positive to 6 (3 months) and 3 (6 months).

From what I understand the elevated liver enzymes is your liver working overtime to help clear waste. Made sense to me that mine was elevated with the stress my body was under. I would certainly ask your doctor what else could cause elevated liver enzymes.

As far as your villi not being damaged at diagnosis - that is a very good thing - it can mean that you had not had active Celiac Disease for a long period of time. Those of us with severe to total villi atrophy can take years to heal. Catching Celiac Disease before severe damage sounds like a very good thing to me.

Since the Celiac diagnosis was a surprise to you - have you noticed any improvements in your health during the past six months that you didn't expect?

Chuck1004 Apprentice

Thanks for replying Lisa!

Just to ask the crazy-man question I was dreading with my results this morning - given the biopsy results - it couldn't be misdiagnosis and that I had some other type of autoimmune disease, in your knowledge? With the lack of symptoms and now that the ttg iga was normal I was freaking out a bit. :)

That's great that your levels normalized after a year! I honestly can say I haven't noticed a difference in the past six months. I have been incredibly careful about gluten intake and I can't point to any point where I've been glutened, so it's possible if I'd been a bit less careful I might have seriously felt it by this point!

GottaSki Mentor

Hi Chuck-

I completely understand why you would question the dx without symptoms. It would be hard to not question it. I can only tell you how much damage gluten can do to a person with Celiac Disease - from this side of the fence you are fortunate to avoid the complications of Celiac. I have read that some folks that where symptom free prior to diagnosis did develop severe reactions to gluten once removed for some time - but I would not count on developing this early warning detection system or testing it ;)

Autoimmune diseases do often run together. Many people with one develop other - my daughter has been dx'd with five! Removing gluten improved ALL of them in her case. You won't necessarily develop another disorder, but it is important to be aware of it. So I say your best path is to remain completely gluten-free and watch the annual blood work - perhaps more often than annual while watching the liver. With no symptoms an annual celiac panel is important to be sure gluten doesn't sneak in with cross contamination or other sources.

Stay healthy!

re-read my post -- if it is not clear -- I have no doubt that you have Celiac Disease based on your blood work and biopsy result. I do believe you were fortunate to have been diagnosed before you had severe damage. Celiac can trigger at any point in one's life, so it is not strange to have found it while looking for something else. Your normal tTG IgA indicates you are doing a good job keeping the gluten out of your diet. You may never have a positive antibody test again - that is the goal - once you remove gluten there is no reason for your body to produce the antibodies.

Chuck1004 Apprentice

Thank you so much for that, Lisa!

I've been incredibly diligent about keeping any trace of gluten out of my foods because I am concerned about doing more damage that I just don't want to miss the possibility that it was anything else. Thanks for putting my mind at ease! I have a fatty liver diagnosis and am a carrier for Alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency so I think there are enough liver variables to cause what is admittedly, a very slight uptick in one enzyme. I'll see what they say this week.

Thanks again!

nvsmom Community Regular

It looks like you're doing a great job staying gluten-free. I hope my TTG tests get low like that. :)

MitziG Enthusiast

I think your dx was accurate. You were fortunate that it was caught very early in the disease, before villous damage occurred. Basically, the anitbodies were there, the lymphocytes were built up, the battle was about to begin....

Because you didn't have damage to your villi yet, your numbers dropped quickly, which is good. I think once the body is in full attack mode it takes a bit longer for it to stop producing antibodies.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    2. - par18 replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - trents replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    4. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,339
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Teresa King
    Newest Member
    Teresa King
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
    • SilkieFairy
      Thank you both for the replies. I decided to bring back gluten so I can do the blood test. Today is Day #2 of the Challenge. Yesterday I had about 3 slices of whole wheat bread and I woke up with urgent diarrhea this morning. It was orange, sandy and had the distinctive smell that I did not have when I was briefly gluten free. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but the brain fog is back and I feel very tired.   
    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.