Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

If Your Doctor Won't Order Testing...


domesticactivist

Recommended Posts

domesticactivist Collaborator

My mom decided to go ahead and get screened, finally. But she has Kaiser and they had to be convinced. Finally they used their screening protocol and ordered only the anti tTG IgA, despite the detailed list I had given her, with specific info on how important it was to also get total IgA for any tests that look at IgA.

Apparently, their protocol also does not allow for running the EMA, or anti-Gliadin Deamidated Peptide IgA or IgG. First they do genetic screening and take family history IF the tTG comes back positive before they will approve those tests. How much do you want to bet their genetic screening only looks for DQ2 and DQ8 and doesn't even look at HLA-DQ alpha?

Open Original Shared Link is more expensive than the blood work. My kids were covered by their insurance for the genetic screening and we couldn't put our son back on gluten, so we did it. I did not get mine done because I was paying out of pocket and was able to extrapolate my results from theirs. I can't remember the cost, now, I think it was something like $360.

What I do know is that I paid only $169 plus a $15 blood draw fee for a combined celiac panel including Total IgA, anti-tTG IgA, EMA, and anti-Gliadin Deamidated Peptide IgA and IgG!!!

These tests can be ordered online (in most USA states) without permission from your doctor, without insurance, for a bit more than I paid through my doctor. Open Original Shared Link

This might be very worth doing if you can't get in to see your doctor or can't get your doctor to approve your blood tests. A couple hundred bucks is plenty, especially if you are poor like we are right now. But the costs of staying on gluten longer in hopes of a doctor finally ordering the tests could be much higher. I was surprised at how reasonable the cost was to get a full standard screening.

I have a friend who is very concerned about the cost and only wants to order the tests if she first uses up her high deductible/health care savings account and can get her doctor to order it and insurance to pay. What is her deductible being consumed with right now? A slew of medications that attempt to control symptoms which could be caused by celiac! I'll definitely be sharing the low cost of getting blood work with her, now that I know!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rosetapper23 Explorer

I'm sorry that your mom has Kaiser. When I asked for my son to be tested by his Kaiser pediatrician eight years ago, he told me he'd never ordered tests for celiac in his career (and this man was probably around 45 at the time), so he would need to check with other doctors to be able to order the tests. I recall that he only ordered one test, but it came back positive, so I didn't pursue any more testing. After years of being treated by Kaiser doctors who had no idea what celiac was about, I finally did some research and came up with the name of a celiac expert who worked at the San Francisco Kaiser. Unfortunately, he wrote me back saying that he no longer worked for Kaiser and that there were NO doctors in the entire Kaiser system who could be considered experienced in treating celiac. I felt very disheartened at that point. Finally, I found a doctor at the Walnut Creek Kaiser who was honest about it--he said that he had never had a patient with celiac (yeah, he'd probably had dozens and didn't know it) but that he was willing to learn. He ordered every test I wanted and ordered intravenous iron when necessary, even though he'd initially never heard of the procedure. In the end, though, Kaiser misdiagnosed my breast cancer, totally flubbed the breast cancer surgery, and then supposedly lost ALL of my medical records (probably to hide their errors in case of a lawsuit). By the way, if your mother is diagnosed with celiac and ever needs to stay at a Kaiser hospital, she should bring ALL of her own food. During the three days I was at Kaiser following my surgery, they refused to feed me anything (because of the celiac) and then glutened me with generic medications that contained gluten--they simply didn't understand that they couldn't just give me pills without checking for gluten first. My mother, who also has celiac, was hospitalized at Kaiser last year for a fainting episode. While they were doing tests, they insisted that she eat even though she kept telling them that she couldn't eat gluten. They assured her that they "thought" the food probably didn't contain gluten. They fed her a Mexican spicy enchilada, and the end result was that she became so ill from being glutened (and there is usually a heightened response to gluten with peppers), she had to remain at the hospital for another three days because they said she was too ill to be discharged. As they continued to make her sicker and sicker, she demanded that they release her. She was very ill for almost a month afterward. Anyway, I left Kaiser a few months after the botched surgery and paid an integrated medicine doctor full price until I could change my insurance carrier to Blue Shield. It was one of the best decisions I've ever made. Now, I know that this forum does not appreciate posters speaking badly of companies or products, but all of the experiences described are factual occurrences.

If your mother is retired, then I know her insurance options are limited. However, if she tests positive for celiac, the testing is only the first hurdle she will encounter at Kaiser. She will need to be her own advocate.

domesticactivist Collaborator

How sad, rosetapper23! That is really unacceptable. I wish it didn't take such a monumental effort to mount a medical malpractice suit because your story and your mother's story definitely warrant a couple.

I actually had improved my opinion of Kaiser in the past few years. I had a friend who was a breast cancer survivor. When it came back, her doctor and many others she went to for pain misdiagnosed the return of her cancer for at least a year. When she switched to Kaiser, it was finally diagnosed. She received top of the line treatment (and participated in a study) for the rest of her too-short life.

I am appalled at the completely lack of information my mom's doctor had! My mom does not have symptoms and all her other blood work came back fine (no osteoperosis, good metabolic panel, etc), and her tTG was low. It's so frustrating that they wouldn't just run the d*** panel once she finally got around to asking for it! I'm more suspicious I got my genes from my dad, anyway. I take after him in a number of ways, including many health issues. No chance of him getting tested, though :(

Fortunately for us, my kids have CIGNA health insurance through their dad. It's spendy, but we only paid $100 when our son was hospitalized for 4 days and had to undergo orthopedic surgery on his hip, lots of labs, and IV antibiotics. The actual bill was in the $100,000 range! We can take them to any health care provider we like, and they will pay a percentage out of network. PPOs are really the way to go, IMO.

My partner and I, on the other hand, have no health insurance. Maybe Obamacare will eventually come through for us but I'm not holding my breath.

rosetapper23 Explorer

I'm glad your friend received good treatment for her breast cancer at Kaiser. My biggest problem with them is that they refuse to deviate from a particular "standard of care" methodology where they refuse to allow for the latest techniques and medications to be used for cancer. When I questioned my Kaiser oncologist about using alternative methods, she opened the door and told me to get out. My oncologist through Blue Shield welcomes innovative techniques and researches anything new that I suggest. He even tests me regularly for side effects to taking certain natural supplements that are standard fare in China for treating cancer. You see, my breast cancer returned a year ago (four tumors, to be exact) because it appears that the Kaiser surgeon may have missed some of the cancer. She told me that my type of cancer was hardly even considered a "true" cancer, but, rather, it used to be considered a precancerous condition. After she did her sloppy job (and failed to perform a sentinal lymph node dissection as I had requested), it turned out that the cancer was invasive and considered a rare, highly aggressive, highly metastatic, and recurrent type. Since Kaiser exhausted the chemos for my type of cancer, I'm only able to use alternative means to fight it now that it's recurred. Currently, my surgeon and oncologist both believe I'm in remission, having removed the tumors and nearby tissue....but I sleep with one eye open.

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast
:o These stories are SHOCKING! My heart goes out to anyone that has to deal with these ridiculous red tape companies. :angry:
mushroom Proficient

I used to work in medical malpractice litigation, and I have heard some hair-raisers, many involving Kaiser. I won't elaborate, but Kaiser members have my sympathies. When their care is good it can be vey good with the right doctor, but the general level stinks. At one point it looked as if Kaiser would be our only insurance option, and the one we had to select wasn't much better, but I have always avoided them. :ph34r:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Haugeabs replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      23

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - trents replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      34

      Blood results

    4. - Known1 replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,414
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Donna Shields
    Newest Member
    Donna Shields
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Haugeabs
      For my Vit D3 deficiency it was recommended to take with Vit K2 (MK7) with the Vit D. The Vit K2 helps absorption of Vit D3. Fat also helps with absorption. I take Micro Ingredients Vit D3 5000 IU with Vit K2 100 micrograms (as menaquinone:MK-7). Comes in soft gels with coconut oil.  Gluten free but not certified gluten free. Soy free, GMO free.   
    • trents
      @Known1, I submitted the following comment along with my contact information: "I have noticed that many food companies voluntarily include information in their ingredient/allergen label section when the product is made in an environment where cross contamination with any of the nine major allergens recognized by the FDA may also be likely. Even though celiac disease and gluten sensitivity are, technically speaking, not allergic responses, it would seem, nonetheless, appropriate to include "gluten" in that list for the present purpose. That would insure that food companies would be consistent with including this information in labeling. Best estimates are that 1% of the general population, many undiagnosed of course, have celiac disease and more than that are gluten sensitive."
    • Wheatwacked
    • Wheatwacked
      Celiac Disease causes more vitamin D deficiency than the general population because of limited UV sunlight in the winter and the little available from food is not absorbed well in the damaged small intestine.  Taking 10,000 IU a day (250 mcg) a day broke my depression. Taking it for eleven years.  Doctor recently said to not stop.  My 25(OH)D is around 200 nmol/L (80 ng/ml) but it took about six years to get there.  Increasing vitamin D also increases absorption of Calcium. A good start is 100-gram (3.5-ounce) serving of salmon,  vitamin D from 7.5 to 25 mcg (300 to 1,000 IU) but it is going to take additional vitamin D supplement to be effective.  More importantly salmon has an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio 1:10 anti-inflammatory compared to the 15:1 infammatory ratio of the typical Western diet. Vitamin D and Depression: Where is all the Sunshine?
    • Known1
      Thank you for sharing your thoughts.  I respectfully disagree.  You cherry picked a small section from the page.  I will do the same below: The agency is seeking information on adverse reactions due to “ingredients of interest” (i.e., non-wheat gluten containing grains (GCGs) which are rye and barley, and oats due to cross-contact with GCGs) and on labeling issues or concerns with identifying these “ingredients of interest” on packaged food products in the U.S. “People with celiac disease or gluten sensitives have had to tiptoe around food, and are often forced to guess about their food options,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “We encourage all stakeholders to share their experiences and data to help us develop policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices.” --- end quote Anyone with celiac disease is clearly a stakeholder.  The FDA is encouraging us to share our experiences along with any data to help develop future "policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices".  I see this as our chance to speak up or forever hold our peace.  Like those that do not participate in elections, they are not allowed to complain.  The way I see it, if we do not participate in this request for public comment/feedback, then we should also not complain when we get ill from something labeled gluten-free. Have a blessed day ahead, Known1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.