Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Why Is A Biopsy So Often Necessary When Labs Are Positive?


appletree729

Recommended Posts

appletree729 Apprentice

I'm just awaiting my lab results and have been wondering - why is it so often recommended to go get a biopsy if the bloodwork comes back positive?  Especially if it's really positive.  I know the biopsy is the 'gold standard", and I understand the importance of doing it if there are symptoms and the bloodwork is negative because there can still be damage, but I don't understand the justification when the bloodwork is positive.  

 

Isn't the bloodwork (at least one of the tests) pretty specific to celiac?  If you're making antibodies to gliadin, isn't that a big red flag that something is wrong and you should be avoiding gluten anyway?

 

There's obviously something that I'm not understanding fully.  What justifies a more invasive procedure such as a biopsy when the bloodwork seems to tell us that the answer is to avoid gluten no matter what?

 

ps - I am aware of the somewhat newer guidelines that allows a doctor to diagnose celiac without biopsy in certain circumstances, based on bloodwork.  Just wondering why this isn't always the case.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Here's a link from the University of Chicago's Celiac website that can answer your question:

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

That said, I had a "mild" positive on my blood test.  Seven weeks later my biopsy (they took more than two samples) showed Marsh Stage IIIB damage.  Now, I know exactly where I stand.  I'll have a follow-up blood test and another biopsy in a year.  Hopefully, the damage to my intestines will improve.  If I'm gluten free compliant (via blood test) and I'm still stuck at Marsh Stage IIIB,  maybe I'm getting damage from something else.  At least I have something to compare it to (that's not the wording that I'm looking for.....)

 

Some people just use the blood test since having an endoscopy in itself may be risky due to other medical problems.  They then  try the diet to see if it relieves symptoms.   Later, they may have to have an endoscopy if their symptoms don't improve.

 

Does that help?  

appletree729 Apprentice

yes - thank you.  That does help.

 

Just got my results back and seems it doesn't apply to me anyway.  No antibody detected for me but I am anemic, so they say there is still good reason to go ahead with the biopsy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,665
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Christa Cook
    Newest Member
    Christa Cook
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
    • Xravith
      Thank you for the advice. I’ve actually never checked for nutritional deficiencies, but for as long as I can remember, I’ve always taken vitamin and mineral supplements — otherwise my symptoms get worse. This week I stopped eating gluten to confirm whether my symptoms are really caused by it. Starting next week, I’ll reintroduce gluten — it’s sad to go back to how I was before — but at least I’ll be able to take the necessary tests properly. I think the diagnostic process will be long, but at least I’m happy that I finally decided to address this doubt I’ve had for years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.