Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Next?


cmc811

Recommended Posts

cmc811 Apprentice

Hello!

 

I have a 5 year old son that I believe is showing a lot of celiac signs. I talked to his doctor about it and she ordered a CBC, Metabolic Panel, Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody and IgA, Serum. All were normal. Specifically the Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody was <1 and the IgA Serum was 120 (24-300 is normal).

 

I also am having symptoms so I was tested as well but my doctor only ordered the Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody which was 7 and considered a weak positive (anything over 4 is positive).

 

We both have appointments next week but what should I ask for? Obviously I want to persue more testing for myself since there were antibodies detected, but should I go right for the biopsy or would other bloodwork be beneficial?

 

For my son, I know false negatives are common in young kids but at 5 would he fall into that category? What else, short of going gluten free and seeing if he improves, should I ask for?

 

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



NoGlutenCooties Contributor

Just wanted to mention that I don't trust the "weak positive" thing.  When I was tested, the lab that did my bloodwork considered anything 11 and under as negative (different labs have different numbers).  I was a 13.  So I could have been considered a "weak positive".  But when I got my biopsy, I had moderate to severe villi damage.

 

This leads me to believe that positive is positive.  There doesn't seem to be much of a correlation between the actual number and the extent of the damage.

cmc811 Apprentice

Just wanted to mention that I don't trust the "weak positive" thing.  When I was tested, the lab that did my bloodwork considered anything 11 and under as negative (different labs have different numbers).  I was a 13.  So I could have been considered a "weak positive".  But when I got my biopsy, I had moderate to severe villi damage.

 

This leads me to believe that positive is positive.  There doesn't seem to be much of a correlation between the actual number and the extent of the damage.

I agree that a weak positive definitely needs to be considered positive and further testing needs to be done, but what specifically should I ask for? Straight to a biopsy?

 

And for my son, should I demand the DGP since it is typically better for kids since his tTG was negative?

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

I agree that a weak positive definitely needs to be considered positive and further testing needs to be done, but what specifically should I ask for? Straight to a biopsy?

 

And for my son, should I demand the DGP since it is typically better for kids since his tTG was negative?

 

If it were me, I'd request the biopsy - as long as your insurance will pay for it with what the doctor classifies as a "weak positive".  You may want to beef-up your gluten intake for about 2 weeks prior to the biopsy - just to make sure there's plenty of inflammation in there for a firm diagnosis.  If your insurance company won't pay for the biopsy, or if your doctor won't order it for you, you could do the equivalent of a gluten-challenge and eat 2 pieces of bread every day for a couple of months and then redo the bloodwork.  It may be enough to raise it to your doctor's liking for a biopsy.  Depending on how bad gluten affects you, this may or may not be an option for you.

 

I have no experience with kids - and I know things are a bit different with young kids, so hopefully someone else can give you some advice on that front.

cmc811 Apprentice

Thanks for your advice. Anyone want to weigh in on what to ask for in regards to my son?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,670
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CDR40
    Newest Member
    CDR40
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.