Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dxed Celiac By Biopsy, Should I Bother With Bloodwork?


JodyM75

Recommended Posts

JodyM75 Apprentice

I have a 20+ year history of reflux due to a hiatal hernia, and I was recently diagnosed with gastroparesis (delayed stomach emptying).  Both are also symtoms of Celiac, so, before my EGD two weeks ago, I asked the doc to do a test for Celiac.  He wavered and caved in, and I'm glad I asked becuase the test came back positive.

 

I've never had bloodwork or any other tests for Celiac.  At this point, should I bother?  I have an appointment with my regular doc tomorrow, and I'm wondering if I should request any other tests.

 

Thanks,

 

Jody


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I would ask for the blood panel provided you are still consuming gluten. Villi can be damaged from other things (like milk) per the University of Chicago's celiac website. Research, print and hand it over to your doctor. I would hate to have to give up gluten for life if it was not causing damage.

kareng Grand Master

I think the blood work would be good for follow up purposes. You need to get it checked after about 6 months gluten-free & then every year. It may not be negative after 6 months , but you could see it going down and know you are on the right track.

JodyM75 Apprentice

I did not know other things can cause villous atrophy.  I will discuss this tomorrow with my PCP and request bloodwork.  I started with the gluten-free bit yesterday.

 

Unlike many people on these boards, my symtpoms are not severe and, frankly, I don't know yet what symptoms this is actually causing.  If it is Celiac, I'm guessing my symptoms would become evident when I took it out of my diet and they disappeared.

 

The GI doctor said I tested positive for "mild celiac" and after researching it I take that to mean the villous damage was mild because you either have Celiac or you don't.  He wanted me to go on a gluten-free diet.  I've been researching like crazy since then! 

 

Jody

Celiacandme Apprentice

I agree with Karen. Get the blood work so you know where your levels are now and they can be monitored. It's nice to see them come down after 3 and 6 months on the diet. Then for future blood work as well. I would also request that they check you for any vitamin deficiencies. Happens often with celiac disease and you may need to supplement with vitamins. Iron levels, Vitamin D, B-12, etc. Have them check so you know! Update us when you can!

JodyM75 Apprentice

Thanks for all the input, I will push for the bloodwork when I see the doc today.  I was checked for vitamin deficiencies about 6 months ago and the only one was Vit D, everything else was normal.  I've been on PPIs for 15 years and read that they can cause deficiencies as well, but to my surprise all was pretty normal. 

JodyM75 Apprentice

I have the bloodwork form and she also is requesting a food allergy panel.  I got the impression she didn't think the bloodwork was necessary if I got diagnosed by biopsy.  I'm feeling very unsure and a bit confused right now.  I really dislike trying to navigate through modern medicine....

 

What if the bloodwork doesn't match the biopsy results?  (See, the "What if"s are starting already...)

 

If the villi is being damaged by something else, how will I narrow that down? 

 

Does Celiac damage all the intestine or just the small intestine?

 

Jody


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I did not know other things can cause villous atrophy.  I will discuss this tomorrow with my PCP and request bloodwork.  I started with the gluten-free bit yesterday.

 

Unlike many people on these boards, my symtpoms are not severe and, frankly, I don't know yet what symptoms this is actually causing.  If it is Celiac, I'm guessing my symptoms would become evident when I took it out of my diet and they disappeared.

 

The GI doctor said I tested positive for "mild celiac" and after researching it I take that to mean the villous damage was mild because you either have Celiac or you don't.  He wanted me to go on a gluten-free diet.  I've been researching like crazy since then! 

 

Jody

I was "mildly" positive o my blood test but my biopsy via endoscopy revealed Marsh Stage IIIB, which is severe damage! My only symptom was anemia and since I had two anemias (one iron deficient and the other genetic) the iron deficiency anemia was attributed to men's traction. Stopped that and the doc noticed that I was still anemic. It has been a year since my dx, but I can be scoped to see if I my villi have improved. I am glad I had the biopsy.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I have the bloodwork form and she also is requesting a food allergy panel.  I got the impression she didn't think the bloodwork was necessary if I got diagnosed by biopsy.  I'm feeling very unsure and a bit confused right now.  I really dislike trying to navigate through modern medicine....

 

What if the bloodwork doesn't match the biopsy results?  (See, the "What if"s are starting already...)

 

If the villi is being damaged by something else, how will I narrow that down? 

 

Does Celiac damage all the intestine or just the small intestine?

 

Jody

It damages just the small and things like milk can damage villi, but focus on one thing at a time. Mine did not match. My biopsy showed much more severe damage.

Scour the University of Chicago website for complete and accurate information about celiac disease.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,683
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jean Tonkin
    Newest Member
    Jean Tonkin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.