Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Could This Be Dh?


Sadmum

Recommended Posts

Sadmum Newbie

Hi

I'm after some advice/experience with DH rash.

My son (almost 5) broke out in a very itchy,spotty rash with pastules about 6 months ago. He has always had a very mild ezcema, but this rash was very worrying to me. He wasn't sick, but he had a temp just from the heat of this rash! He couldn't sleep for a few nights. The GP did a celiac blood test and it was negative.

My SIL is diagnosed celiac, and my son had been having tummy issues (I thought from dairy at the time) so I googled celiac rash and that's when I discovered this DH. It was too similar, so I just took him off gluten and it cleared up.

4 months later he had his dermatology appt, (very long wait in public system where I live) and I put him back on gluten for 2 weeks before, and of course the rash was only just starting to appear.. She diagnosed ezcema and sent me off with some steroid ointment for him. I've kept him on gluten, and over the last 2 months the rash has been coming back, the ointment keeps it under control but it's always there in the form of purple type spots to show where it's been.

I took him back to GP when it started to spread to his thighs, and he got me another derm appt which was Wednesday. He had spots on right forearm, inside elbow, chest, back, thighs, shins.. He was covered! The derm said it's now 'papular ezcema' and gave me more ointment that's stronger and I have done wet dressings as well. I raised my DH suspicions but they said it "wouldn't respond to steroid, and it's not the correct distribution". (Not on both knees and elbows)

The steroid is keeping it under control, but there are still a few pastules appearing.

My questions are as follows:

Does DH respond to topical steroid? In my sons case the rash has responded, but still keeps coming back? To me that is not a full response.

Are larger blisters always present? He has had many fluid filled pastules, but the derm said it has to be blisters, which he has not had.

Any help would be appreciated =)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Marilyn R Community Regular

I would try to avoid the steroid cream.  It causes thinning of the skin. Try the diet again and see what happens.   Or get him to a good derm. or ped if you want a diagnosis before putting him on a gluten-free diet and be insistent that he be tested.  I feel for both of you!

 

.l

Sadmum Newbie

I will try to link some pictures.

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m207/ness1421/05B4B75D-4442-4DF5-A8AE-4DEA0D0A779D_zpszvri2cdu.webp

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m207/ness1421/C3008BFC-618D-4D67-A070-B0C93DC72195_zpskhvg8atj.webp

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m207/ness1421/1F1DF962-CA42-49C2-A4E5-739FD6950809_zpsthj7vu4m.webp

The last one of his knee is the biggest lesion he ever had, but the only one to show up on his knee. Although it looks like he has 2 staring to appear there at the moment.

Thanks again =)

bluewhitesky Rookie

Poor little sweetheart. He must be so uncomfortable. 

 

We went through something similar with the dermatologist for my DS. He kept saying excema, prescribed steroids, said it wasn't in the right spot for DH, not symmetrical, etc. 

 

My first thought for you was to insist on another appointment with the Derm to take a biopsy. But, you're in a hard place right now because of another problem with the steroid cream. It can cause a false negative. We ended up using the steroid cream after the biopsy and it did seem to help clear up the sores and it did help with the itch. So the derm is wrong, it can have an effect on DH. Many people get a rebound rash after they go off it though, so it's usually not worth it.

 

This whole thing is so ridiculously frustrating. 

 

I think if I were you, I would just take him right off gluten, 100% to give him relief. Keeping him on it long enough to get the steroids out of his system and to try to get a biopsy would be so hard on him (and you). 

 

Judging by your long wait get the derm appt, I'm guessing you are Canadian? Any chance you are from Ottawa? 

 

I'm going to look up my old posts from a few months ago when I was going through the same thing. Though DS's rash wasn't as bad as your little guy's and although it was itchy he rarely complained and it didn't slow him down. We also have a family history of celiac. He gets frequent, mild tummy aches. 

 

We got the biopsy back a couple of weeks ago..it was mostly positive for DH (?) IgA present, but the size of the granules was "not entirely typical of DH". It was positive enough for the derm to call and say no gluten, come and see me in a year. We went back to our GP last week for a full celiac blood panel and vitamin testing. 

 

I don't know if you're read about the connection with iodine. Foods high in iodine can cause the rash to flare up. 

 

I feel like my post is all over the place. Please fire any questions my way if you want. I'm on the cusp of switching from being a mom asking for help to maybe being able to give some help now.

bluewhitesky Rookie

Here are my posts about going through this with my son. Pay particular attention to squirmingitch's responses. She knows what she's talking about.

 

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/106990-possible-dh-6-year-old/

 

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/107188-dermatologist-appointment-today/

 

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/107778-i-think-we-have-a-flare-up-pics/

  • 3 weeks later...
Sadmum Newbie

Thanks for the repliesMarilyn and bluewhitesky!

I have read those threads bluewhitesky, very helpful thanks very much! Especially the pic of your sons forearm, my DS is covered on both forearms at the moment!

Your right it is incredibly frustrating! We have been back to the derm and he looked at his back and declared the spots as 'blocked pores'

Honestly I could not believe my ears! He prescribed more steroid (cream) as the ointment was causing the blocked pores. Well 2 weeks later and of course the 'blocked pores' are still there. What a surprise....

He has been referred to a gastroenterologist as he has some gastric symptoms as well, but that could take 10-12 months.... Although the fact that he is underweight might get him in sooner.

We are back at the derm in 2 weeks, they said if the rash was still occurring they might biopsy even though I have the impression they have no idea what they are looking for.

So a few questions..

I have used the steroid cream only on inner elbows and back of knees (the itchiest spots for him) for the last 2 weeks, so he will have areas that have had no steroid in 4 weeks at his next appointment, is there a chance of a diagnosis or not? I will not allow them to biopsy him if the results will not be accurate. I just won't put him through it.

Also if I do remove gluten again, how long before an endoscopy must he eat gluten again? Is 2-3 months long enough? He has been off gluten for 3 months earlier in the year, and the gastro symptoms returned in full after about 6 weeks.

I know this rash is rare in children, especially 5 year olds, but I really feel he has celiac and I should push for a diagnosis. My DH is getting annoyed at me for continuing to give him gluten even though it's becoming obvious even to us that he has issues with it. I feel like I'm doing the wrong thing by him but at the same time I worry his gluten free diet won't be respected without an official diagnosis.

  • 1 month later...
Sadmum Newbie

Hi.

Just bumping this thread hoping for a little advice.

My son has another derm appointment next week, it will be his last one as I am having another baby very soon and I can't let this go on any longer.

He has been gluten free for a few weeks, after 4 months back on gluten. He is improving already in so many ways but the rash is still persistent. I stopped using the steriod a while ago as I realised they weren't really helping. His skin was peeling and the rash was actually worse.

If I take him to the appointment the derm will want to biopsy (finally)

if he has an active lesion is there a chance of a positive biopsy? Has anyone with a diagnosis been gluten free for a little while before being diagnosed?

Also any comment on the photos above would be welcome.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

I'm sorry but for an accurate biopsy result, you have to be actively eating gluten right up until the biopsy. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.