Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Six-Month Bloodwork - What To Look For?


MyCeliacKid

Recommended Posts

MyCeliacKid Newbie

My 10-year-old daughter was diagnosed with Celiac in January. (TTG >120, positive visual on endoscopy, positive biopsy; yes, she was a very, very sick girl with TTG that high.)

 

She goes back soon for her 6-month check-up with her pediatric gastroenterologist, and he had her peds clinic do a blood draw in advance of this. I realize her peds GE will be the expert at reading all the blood results, but they are available on my peds clinic's online portal for viewing already and, well, I can't help but be curious.

 

Does your gastroenterologist re-run the celiac panel bloodwork with any frequency? I was a little surprised that it doesn't look like a new celiac panel was ordered, as I don't see TTG or IGA any of those usual suspects on the very-lengthy list of blood test results that I see for my daughter's checkup.

 

Are there any specific levels that you continue to see elevated? Or should they all go to "normal"? (And if so - how quickly to normal?) My daughter appears to have oh-so-slightly elevated lymphocytes (1 percentage point above normal range). But her eosinophils are also elevated, to the tune of 4x normal range. I really didn't know how quickly to expect all her blood levels to get to normal range - did you see your ranges get to normal within 6 months? Or should I be patient and hope for more improvement at 12 months?

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I am sure a parent will respond, but healing can take months to a couple of years (probably faster for kids). Antibodies for some people, take a long time to come down. I have never gone back for a follow-up celiac blood test because I have been diet compliant. How do I know? I have been cooking for my husband who has been gluten-free for 13 years. Plus, my anemia has resolved (within six months) and I am feeling good. It did take a good year for me to really feel good.

Why am I telling you this? Six months may just be too soon for the GI to check. There is a steep learning curve and that takes time. Lots of mistakes are made (accidental exposure) during the first few months.

But I think it is a good idea to re-check kids at a year or sooner if there is no improvement at all. Kids tend to "cheat" when they are out of your sight. I would imagine there would be some improvement, but if not, you will have to figure out where the gluten is coming from.

kareng Grand Master

Open Original Shared Link

"

New celiacs should receive follow-up testing twice in the first year after their diagnosis. The first appointment should occur 3-6 months after the diagnosis, and the second should occur after 1 year on a gluten-free diet. After that, a celiac should receive follow-up testing on a yearly basis. We recommend checking both tTG and DGP (Deamidated gliadin peptides) at each screening."

greenbeanie Enthusiast

It's strange if they just did the other bloodwork for follow-up, and not the celiac tests too...

My daughter was diagnosed just after she turned four, and her tTG was 65 at diagnosis, with a reference range of 0-3 as negative and 4+ as positive. So it was over 16x normal at diagnosis. Six months after diagnosis, it was down to 9. Nine months after diagnosis, it was down to 5. It stayed at 5 at a year after diagnosis and some symptoms had returned, but we traced it back to a few weeks' exposure to a non-food source. Her doctor would not agree to test DGP for follow-up too, despite repeated requests, until this last round when the tTG hadn't changed. He did order it for her next check in a couple months.

Definitely get DGP run too if you can! Then if tTG is still positive, that can help determine whether it's just slower-than-expected healing or actual continued gluten exposure. With a high tTG to start, it certainly seems reasonable to think it might still be positive after six months. As long as it's heading down, that's a good thing. I'd heard from many people (including my daughter's GI) that kids heal faster than adults, but I'm not sure that applies to kids who were very sick and/or undiagnosed for a large portion of their lives. My daughter's GI symptoms and rash went away quickly, but some of the neurological stuff took much longer and is still improving now. Her symptoms have tracked her tTG level pretty closely, though I know that's not the case for everyone. Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.