Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Six-Month Bloodwork - What To Look For?


MyCeliacKid

Recommended Posts

MyCeliacKid Newbie

My 10-year-old daughter was diagnosed with Celiac in January. (TTG >120, positive visual on endoscopy, positive biopsy; yes, she was a very, very sick girl with TTG that high.)

 

She goes back soon for her 6-month check-up with her pediatric gastroenterologist, and he had her peds clinic do a blood draw in advance of this. I realize her peds GE will be the expert at reading all the blood results, but they are available on my peds clinic's online portal for viewing already and, well, I can't help but be curious.

 

Does your gastroenterologist re-run the celiac panel bloodwork with any frequency? I was a little surprised that it doesn't look like a new celiac panel was ordered, as I don't see TTG or IGA any of those usual suspects on the very-lengthy list of blood test results that I see for my daughter's checkup.

 

Are there any specific levels that you continue to see elevated? Or should they all go to "normal"? (And if so - how quickly to normal?) My daughter appears to have oh-so-slightly elevated lymphocytes (1 percentage point above normal range). But her eosinophils are also elevated, to the tune of 4x normal range. I really didn't know how quickly to expect all her blood levels to get to normal range - did you see your ranges get to normal within 6 months? Or should I be patient and hope for more improvement at 12 months?

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I am sure a parent will respond, but healing can take months to a couple of years (probably faster for kids). Antibodies for some people, take a long time to come down. I have never gone back for a follow-up celiac blood test because I have been diet compliant. How do I know? I have been cooking for my husband who has been gluten-free for 13 years. Plus, my anemia has resolved (within six months) and I am feeling good. It did take a good year for me to really feel good.

Why am I telling you this? Six months may just be too soon for the GI to check. There is a steep learning curve and that takes time. Lots of mistakes are made (accidental exposure) during the first few months.

But I think it is a good idea to re-check kids at a year or sooner if there is no improvement at all. Kids tend to "cheat" when they are out of your sight. I would imagine there would be some improvement, but if not, you will have to figure out where the gluten is coming from.

kareng Grand Master

Open Original Shared Link

"

New celiacs should receive follow-up testing twice in the first year after their diagnosis. The first appointment should occur 3-6 months after the diagnosis, and the second should occur after 1 year on a gluten-free diet. After that, a celiac should receive follow-up testing on a yearly basis. We recommend checking both tTG and DGP (Deamidated gliadin peptides) at each screening."

greenbeanie Enthusiast

It's strange if they just did the other bloodwork for follow-up, and not the celiac tests too...

My daughter was diagnosed just after she turned four, and her tTG was 65 at diagnosis, with a reference range of 0-3 as negative and 4+ as positive. So it was over 16x normal at diagnosis. Six months after diagnosis, it was down to 9. Nine months after diagnosis, it was down to 5. It stayed at 5 at a year after diagnosis and some symptoms had returned, but we traced it back to a few weeks' exposure to a non-food source. Her doctor would not agree to test DGP for follow-up too, despite repeated requests, until this last round when the tTG hadn't changed. He did order it for her next check in a couple months.

Definitely get DGP run too if you can! Then if tTG is still positive, that can help determine whether it's just slower-than-expected healing or actual continued gluten exposure. With a high tTG to start, it certainly seems reasonable to think it might still be positive after six months. As long as it's heading down, that's a good thing. I'd heard from many people (including my daughter's GI) that kids heal faster than adults, but I'm not sure that applies to kids who were very sick and/or undiagnosed for a large portion of their lives. My daughter's GI symptoms and rash went away quickly, but some of the neurological stuff took much longer and is still improving now. Her symptoms have tracked her tTG level pretty closely, though I know that's not the case for everyone. Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.