Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Deciding To Pursue Genetic Testing - Helpful Or Not?


funDiva

Recommended Posts

funDiva Newbie

OK so I've spend the last few days immersed in learning how the genetic tests work and I'm weighing the pros/cons

 

My doc is willing to write any paperwork claiming medical necessity, yet I'm not sure it's worth the hassle.  More than likely my insurance would only possibly cover Quest in-network and they don't actually tell you your results, they just give a positive/negative for HLA DQ2/8

Open Original Shared Link

 

So I'm inclined to go with Enterolab, just the genetic test for $150 since that's the easiest and cheapest option, and would yield the same beta only results as Quest.

 

My out-of-network deductible is $600 and I've racked up zero toward it this year so I'd pay full price anyway for any other lab.

 

somewhere on thefooddoc.com

Laboratories in the U.S. that are known to offer complete alpha and beta subunit genetic testing include Kimball Genetics, Prometheus, and LabCorp. Bonfils, Quest and Enterolab only test for the beta subunit portions and may miss part of a minor alpha subunit that carries a risk of celiac disease.

 

then enterolab counters that citing "linkage disequilibrium"

Open Original Shared Link

 

and I will dig for my sources if anyone needs them, I cut & pasted bunches just for my own info

 

So the real question is, for any of you that were in celiac limbo, already gluten-free and unable to test or challenge, did the genetic test help?  Like mentally/peace of mind wise?

 

Or if anyone has hints on how they got insurance to pay or what you paid thru any of the above labs, that'd be great.  I found older info stating Kimball was ~$395, Prometheus $440 but maybe cash discount or pay up front discounts available.

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SMRI Collaborator

Why do you need the diagnosis--that is the first question. If you are already gluten-free and seeing a positive response from the diet, I'd save the money and maybe down the road when you do meet your deductible, have the testing done then.  Having the genes doesn't mean you have Celiac, which you know.  My daughter has the genes, but, didn't test positive on anything else.  Her bloodwork won't come back positive even if she does have it because of her immune issues.  Nothing showed up on the biopsies.  She, however, is very symptomatic, way more than I am/was.  Who knows??  

kareng Grand Master

I used Quest and they do give a very detailed genetic report.  And my insurance covered it with no question or extra work from the doctor. If you have to pay out of pocket - they were about $300.  You can call and ask.  To be fair, while some of that other  place's tests are not considered scientifically valid, I haven't heard that the genetic one is wrong.

nvsmom Community Regular

Dr Fasano, a leading celiac disease researcher, sya one needs 4 out of 5 of the following criteria for an "official" celiac disease diagnosis:

  1. symptoms of celiac disease while on a normal diet
  2. positive blood test
  3. positive endoscopic biopsy
  4. positive genetic test
  5. positive response to the gluten-free diet

To be honest, I would guess that maybe 60% of celiacs meet all those criteria due to resources, cost and need.  I personally skipped the biopsy and was not offered the genetic test so according to Fasano, and some other doctors I've met, I don't officially have celiac disease.  LOL I say, who cares what they say? I meet the most important criteria: a positive response to the gluten-free diet. KWIM?

 

The genetic tests will only tell you if you are part of the 30% of the population who has the genes which over 95% of celiacs possess, it does not tell you if you have the disease.  There is even a rare, small minority of celiacs who do not have those genes but do have celiac disease (they met 4/5 of the criteria) so those genetic tests are not fool proof... although generally accurate.

 

If you have other family members with celiac disease, or with other autoimmune diseases like diabetes (type 1), lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, or thyroiditis, then chances are that you have the genes for celiac disease.... But you still won't have the official diagnosis. :(

 

Good luck to you in whatever you decide to do.  And continued best wishes for success with the gluten-free diet. :) Welcome to the board.

StephanieL Enthusiast

In the absence of other testing, I don't see how it would be worth it.  Is knowing you *could* have something means just that-could.  It is in no way definitive.  If it's - it doesn't mean you don't have an issue with gluten just that it's not Celiac.  

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

There are also people who don't have the genes but still get celiac.  The genetic test actually slowed down our testing/diagnosis process.  The first MD we saw was skeptical that my son (then age 6) had it since he had no classic symptoms and was average height and weight.  He could not explain the positive blood tests, so he did a genetic test.  The genetic test indicated that he was not likely to develop celiac disease, so he concluded that he couldn't possibly have it.  (even though I tested positive too, and had ALL the classic symptoms.)  This doctor concluded that the initial positive blood test must have been a "lab error".

 

We continued looking and took him to the Celiac Center at Children's Hospital Boston.  They did an endoscopy and found extensive celiac damage.

 

So in this case, the genetic test results were very misleading.  His doctor at CHB doesn't even do them on anyone since they don't really tell you anything.  There are exceptions in both directions (some with genes DON'T get it.  Some without genes DO get it.)  I certainly wouldn't spend any money on it.

funDiva Newbie

Thanks for listening and the input.  After more hours of searching, I found my answer - 23andme for $110.  I am fully aware I'll have to parse the info myself, that's fine.  Plus I can doink around with methylation, ancestry and tons of other interesting tidbits for way cheaper than I woulda paid for any of them individually.

 

It's not perfect, I'm sure the accuracy of the specialized tests is greater, but I can justify $110 for proly as good of info plus more, so this is a happy medium for me.  Their FDA kerfuffle does not concern me.  The minor possible cons I considered are privacy and accuracy [Open Original Shared Link

 

My kit is on it's way and turnaround is anywhere from 4-8 weeks, I'll report back if anyone is interested.

 

It's silly, I agree, to test for a maybe possible probability only, yet I feel happier and a sense of relief now that I found a way to do this cheap.  So if nothing else, while I'm waiting for results maybe all I gain is a little calm of "I am moving forward in a productive way".  Whatever the results will not change how I'm living, but maybe this will distract me enough while I wait for some real test that will settle it.

 

My attitude going 100% gluten-free was, I can do this for 10 years and within that time they'll proly figure out better testing w/o the gluten challenge.  I'm two years in, I finally within the last few months began to feel better finally finally.  Which is worse: the incessant tedium of everything is poison paranoia and years later find out it wasn't necessary *OR* to not be 100% careful and years later discover I was damaging my health all along?

 

I've never purposefully glutened myself, I figured I'd screw up eventually, but out of the 6-7 times I considered myself glutened, only two were positive/yes there was actual gluten, the rest were possible cross contamination or a food not specifically labeled accurately.  I have contemplated doing a DIY double blind placebo challenge, knowing I'd have to do it when I could afford the 3 day slam/2 week recovery.

 

What if I'm putting myself and my husband thru all this meticulousness for nothing?  What if I'm wrong?  What if I doubt myself because of all the stupid stupid doctors that told me it was all in my head for the past 9 years?

 

/offtopicventrantinmyownthread

 

Append to first post - Kimball no longer does testing, they rolled that test to LabCorp and I found Open Original Shared Link for $250 that tests HLA-DQA1*05, HLA-DQB1*02 and HLA-DQB1*0302, so that looks suspiciously like private labeled Quest


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,141
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    islaPorty
    Newest Member
    islaPorty
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.