Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New And Conflicted


BoosMomma

Recommended Posts

BoosMomma Newbie

My 10 year old daughter had endoscopy today and I will have to wait until next Friday to find out the results. GI doc prescribed a gluten-free diet and was about to send the RD to speak to us until I reminded him that I am an RD. I am comfortable with the diet; I am just confused about diagnosis. I guess I should explain how i got here.

 

My daughter has always had tummy issues and frequent headaches. Nothing to keep her down for too long but enough for me to think there may be a problem. So, a few weeks ago we had to go to dr for walking pneumonia and I decided bring up the tummy troubles. He suggested a celiac panel and testing for the big 7 food allergies. I got a call a week and a half later from the nurse, explaining that the celiac panel was "modestly elevated" and that I was being referred to pediatric GI specialist. I am not sure what I was expecting from our first visit to GI specialist, but I was surprised that after taking our history, he wanted to go ahead and schedule endoscopy. I left his office  and immediately started coming up with all kinds of questions. After researching, I was upset with myself for not getting the detailed lab results. So, I decided to be patient and wait to talk more about it today with GI dr. After the procedure, he brought the pictures in and there is no visible signs of damage. My husband took that to mean thereis nothing wrong with her. I knew that we would have to wait for biopsy results; I just wanted to know more about the numbers. I get all confused with the TTG and TGA or whatever it is. This is all I took away from the conversation- both numbers were just above the threshold. Like a point or something. If 5 is the maximum normal range, then hers was a 6. What is he referring to when he says "both numbers"?

 

So, long story short- I think the dr is proceeding as if he thinks that she has Celiac.However, he will not say that without the biopsy report. I asked what we would do if biopsy came back negative.He said that if it was inconclusive, then we would go about life as normal and check her again in a year. He explained that 3% of people have numbers that are a little high. I took that to mean there is a 97% chance she has celiac. Am I being too negative? I am transitioning us to gluten-free diet and my husband thinks I am being ridiculous. He thinks we should wait until next Friday. I am going to hold my ground at the risk of being viewed as the devil for taking away her favorite foods without a diagnosis. There is never a good time to make a big change like this, but I think fall season may be the worst. Football parties, fall festivals, halloween, thanksgiving, Christmas, etc...

 

enough of my rambling. Any insight would be much appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SMRI Collaborator

Can you get a copy of the tests they did an post the results with the ranges?  Do they have online access maybe?  Knowing what the actual tests were and the scale will help us answer your questions better.  I'd wait a bit before going gluten free in case they need to run more tests.  If they only did the TT IgA, they may want to run the full panel, for example.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

It's common to not see damage visibly during the endsocopy, but the samples may show damage. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

With a positive blood test, she probably has Celiac Disease. The biopsy should confirm it. But even if the biopsy in inconclusive (think about it....the small intestine is vast), the next step would be diet. If she gets relief, then you have your answer.

I know you are a RD, but here are some tips from from our "Coping" section:

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

BTW, I was barely positive on my blood test (just one celiac disease test was positive) and I had moderate to severe damage on my biopsy.

If the biopsy is negative, I would try the diet and not wait. Check out the University of Chicago's celiac website. Or get another opinion. My kid tested negative (she has both parents with celiac disease) and will continue to get tested every few years because we both do not display intestinal issues (I had anemia). But if she were positive, I would put her on the diet even with a negative biopsy. You daughter is growing. So many things like bones, puberty could be delayed or damaged. Is that worth it?

Just do some more research, please!

BoosMomma Newbie

Thank you for the feedback!

 

 I just talked to the nurse from pediatricians office. She said that the AB,IGA (is this TTG?) was 5 and normal is less than 4.

She said immunoglobulin A was 113 (normal)

IGA titer is positive (supposed to be negative)

Endomysial Antibody titer was 1:5 and normal is less than 1:5....

 

I hope I wrote it down correctly. And I hope you can help me understand what this means. 

I had my blood drawn today. Inquiring mind (mine) wants to know....

BoosMomma Newbie

With a positive blood test, she probably has Celiac Disease. The biopsy should confirm it. But even if the biopsy in inconclusive (think about it....the small intestine is vast), the next step would be diet. If she gets relief, then you have your answer.

I know you are a RD, but here are some tips from from our "Coping" section:

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

BTW, I was barely positive on my blood test (just one celiac disease test was positive) and I had moderate to severe damage on my biopsy.

If the biopsy is negative, I would try the diet and not wait. Check out the University of Chicago's celiac website. Or get another opinion. My kid tested negative (she has both parents with celiac disease) and will continue to get tested every few years because we both do not display intestinal issues (I had anemia). But if she were positive, I would put her on the diet even with a negative biopsy. You daughter is growing. So many things like bones, puberty could be delayed or damaged. Is that worth it?

Just do some more research, please!

I will continue to research and we are already moving to gluten-free diet. I know it's all or nothing and we will get there. I just have to educate my husband so he'll know why we have to make such a huge change. I know it's not easy and that's what is freaking me out. I can do it, but it is going to kill me when other people undermine my efforts. So many people are ignorant....I'll just have to school them :)

Solandra Rookie

My GP told me that a positive is a positive.. It's pretty rare to have a false positive, but false negatives are slightly more common. I would wait for the biopsy results, but I don't see anything wrong with trying gluten free for a couple of months and seeing how she does.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



BoosMomma Newbie

Update- the biopsy "was not suggestive of celiac" but duodenum was a little irritated from acid. Also, biopsy showed lactose malabsorption. Dr wants to put my 10 year-old on zantac and lactose free diet. This is all I know because he left this on my voicemail at 9:05 pm last night. I carried my phone around all day yesterday waiting for his call and still missed it. Ugh! She has been gluten-free since the endo last wednesday (over a week) and I'm not sure if the Dr intends for me to keep it that way. I don't really care because I've decided to keep it that way. I had already moved her to lactaid so now I just need to worry about other sources of lactose and the acid. I am not opposed to short-term use of the acid reducer to help calm the gut, but no way am I going to do it long-term. I have more questions than answers. EMA was positive TTG was 5 (supposed be less than 4). Could this have anything to do with the lactose malabsorption? Or would the lactose malabsorption have any effect on her celiac panel results. I think I know the answer to this but I am looking for some feedback from those with experience. thanks!!!

cyclinglady Grand Master

When villi are damaged from celiac disease, they can not release the enzymes to digest foods (e.g. Lactose). Often this is temporary (six months or more) until intestinal healing occurs.

I would get copies of all the reports. Visually, my endoscopy looked normal. The biopsy from reviewed by the pathologist showed differently.

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

A positive blood test is a positive blood test.  That the endoscopy was "not suggestive" does not rule out Celiac (the scope can only confirm it).    Many doctors want to wait until there measurable damage before starting the diet.  If your daughter is already having symptoms, why wait.   Yes, the diet is not easy . . . but it sounds like you already know it is necessary.  

 

All first degree relative should also be tested, regardless of symptoms.  

 

I have read that lactose malabsorption can be a "symptom" of celiac (due to damage) and that after a few weeks of being gluten free (different for everyone) you may be able to start adding dairy products back into her diet.

nvsmom Community Regular

So, long story short- I think the dr is proceeding as if he thinks that she has Celiac.However, he will not say that without the biopsy report. I asked what we would do if biopsy came back negative.He said that if it was inconclusive, then we would go about life as normal and check her again in a year. He explained that 3% of people have numbers that are a little high. I took that to mean there is a 97% chance she has celiac. Am I being too negative? I am transitioning us to gluten-free diet and my husband thinks I am being ridiculous. He thinks we should wait until next Friday. I am going to hold my ground at the risk of being viewed as the devil for taking away her favorite foods without a diagnosis. There is never a good time to make a big change like this, but I think fall season may be the worst. Football parties, fall festivals, halloween, thanksgiving, Christmas, etc...

 

enough of my rambling. Any insight would be much appreciated!

 

Eek! Don't listen to that doctor.  A positive EMA IgA and a positive tTG IgA (or tTG IgG) is definitely a celiac diagnosis - in fact I had those two positive tests and my doctor diagnosed me on the spot. Look at thisOpen Original Shared Link for how specific to celiac disease those two tests are - combined they are considered conclusive.  See the top of page 11, where discussing the EMA IgA they say: 

 

IgA endomysial antibody testing is moderately sensitive (around 80%) and highly specific (with close to 100% specificity) for untreated (active) celiac disease

 

That EMA (endomysial) test means celiac disease. With the presence of celiac disease symptoms (and your daughter's are the same as mine when I was a child) there really can be little doubt it's celiac disease.

 

That doctor wants your daughter to keep eating gluten so that she will accumulate more intestinal damage that they will hopefully catch next time (1 in 5 celiacs has a negative biopsy), and so her test numbers will get worse.  I think it is pretty sad that he is encouraging another year of less than ideal health  rather than suggesting the gluten-free diet or doing genetic tests!  Sad.

 

Dr Fasano, the leading celiac disease researcher, says to have a celiac diagnosis, the patient should meet 4 out of 5 of the following criteria:

  1. symptoms of celiac disease
  2. positive tests
  3. positive biopsy
  4. positive genetic tests
  5. positive response to the gluten-free diet

Your daughter has met numbers 1 and 2.  Number 3 (biopsy) was not positive but it sounds like she is on her way there. Becase she had a positive EMA IgA, I would bet money that she would have positive genetic tests if you had them done.  As for number 5, after a few weeks or months on the gluten-free diet I bet her symptoms would improve and that she will no longer have lactose intolerance - as Cyclinglady wrote, celiac disease causes lactose intolerance (in half of all celiacs) but it often improves as the months go by.

 

Best wishes to you.  Getting a celiac disease diagnosis is tough to get, and it is often hard to adjust to a new way of eating.  I hope she is feeling better soon and it will make all the confusion and effort worth it.... Just think of the possible years of future bad health that you are saving her by doing the research, testing and diet changes now.  Good job, Mom!  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,568
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DeanaP
    Newest Member
    DeanaP
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Cat M
      Ah ok, I just saw didn’t even post the DGP IgA at all. 😫 I started with itching and hives Jan 2024, been taking a ton of meds and on Xolair and even that is not providing total relief. The other primary symptoms: intermittent but worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloating. This summer I am just exhausted. I uploaded my 23andMe data to genetic lifehacks and discovered quite a few variations, including DQ2, MTHFR, VDR and I have always had very low ferritin, vitamin D and B12. I still think that mast cell disease makes the most sense, but latest labs show I am barely in range for thiamine, zinc and vitamin A, so the GI stuff feels more important to figure out than the hives right now. I did SIBO testing this morning. TTG IGA <2   0-3 is negative TTG IGG  3   0-5 is neg DGP IGA 21    20-30 is weak positive DGP IGG 4    0-19 is negative Although total IGA is not resulted, there is a footnote stating it was low and the reason they ran IGG.  
    • Scott Adams
      This is an interesting case. A positive tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody with a negative endomysial antibody (EMA) and normal duodenal histology can present a diagnostic challenge, especially in an asymptomatic patient. While the absence of villous atrophy and negative EMA suggest that the likelihood of active celiac disease is low at this time, such serological discordance may still warrant monitoring. Some individuals may be in the early stages of celiac disease, often referred to as potential celiac disease, particularly if they carry the HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 haplotypes. HLA typing can be quite helpful in this situation; a negative result would virtually rule out celiac disease, whereas a positive result may justify periodic follow-up to monitor for evolving disease. The risk of progression to overt celiac disease is not well defined but appears to be higher in children, those with a family history, or those with autoimmune conditions. In this case, routine follow-up including repeat serology and consideration of symptoms or new risk factors over time would be a reasonable and cautious approach. For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions, including cow's milk/casein intolerance, that can also cause this, and here is an article about the other possible causes:      
    • Scott Adams
      Have you tried to start a gluten-free diet since your diagnosis in 2019?
    • trents
      Welcome to celiac.com, @Wamedh Taj-Aldeen! Just curious, what is your relationship to the patient? Are you the attending physician? A medical student? A consulted physician? Was a total IGA test ordered? Some physicians are under the dated and mistaken impression that such is only necessary in young children. If total IGA is low, other IGA antibody numbers will be artificially depressed. By the way, it is not unusual to have a positive TTG-IGA and a negative EMA. Are the TTG-IGA numbers borderline high or unequivocally high? There are other diseases and medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA numbers besides celiac disease but when this is the case, the numbers are usually not dramatically elevated. It can also be the case that villous damage was patchy and affected areas were missed during the biopsy. Or, onset of celiac disease was very recent and villous atrophy has not yet progressed to the point of detectability.  We also have occasional anecdotal reports in this online community of positive antibody testing with negative histology, as you report. But we also know that gluten intolerance can manifest itself apart from enteropathy. It can damage other organ systems. Many celiacs are of the "silent" type, meaning there is an absence or a relative absence of symptoms until the disease has become advanced and there is significant damage to the villous lining or other organ systems. But to answer your questions: 1. I would definitely pursue a routine follow-up and recheck of the antibodies. And, I would order a complete celiac panel including total IGA and IGG stuff in say, six months. Sooner if symptoms manifest. 2. It is impossible to say what is the risk of the future development of over celiac disease. I refer you back to my #1 above concerning rechecking.  3. I would definitely pursue HLA DQ2/DQ8 typing as it can be used as a rule out for celiac disease, though not quite with 100% dependability. I hope my thoughts prove helpful to you.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @dominiqueccms! Unfortunately, your story is all too common. Some older physicians are dismissive when it comes to gluten intolerance disorders and have this attitude like, "It's the latest fad disease." My advice to you is to get another doctor who has more current knowledge in this area and will take this seriously. In the meantime, this might be helpful: In six months to a year you would do well to get your antibody numbers rechecked to see if you are succeeding in your efforts to eat gluten free. Do you have the numbers from the original testing?
×
×
  • Create New...