Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Unexpectedly Tested Positive For Gliadin Dp Iga!


cdbroberg

Recommended Posts

cdbroberg Newbie

Good afternoon and thank you for reading my first post. 

 

I recently visited with an OBGYN MD with a focus in integrative medicine to find out why I was suddenly losing my hair. 

 

I mentioned to her that I had been feeling fine recently, but that I had severe gastrointestinal distress (diarrhea) over the summer which resulted in losing a significant amount of weight in a short time. I thought maybe this was why I started losing my hair in October. 

 

She inquired about which tests were given due to the GI distress (endoscopy, colonoscopy, blood, urine and stool tests-all normal). They did not, however, do the blood tests for Celiac, so she ordered those, along with thyroid, cbc, etc. for the hair loss. 

 

To my surprise, my gliadin deamidated IgA levels were high (11.2) 

 

Ref

<7 Negative

4-7 Equivocal 

>10 Positive 

 

My doc is not an expert in GI, so she recommended that I return to my gastro to review the results.  Everything I'm reading seems to state that a positive result on this test indicates Celiac.  

 

My gastro's website however states that: 

Other tests such as tests for gliadin antibodies are not as accurate because they can be abnormal in healthy patients who do not have celiac disease or in people with other digestive problems. 

 

 

Honestly, if she told me that these results do not indicate celiac, I would be over the moon, but I do want to get an accurate diagnosis. 

 

This along with the fact that she failed to do a celiac panel when I was sick makes me wonder about whether to return to her or find a new doctor.  Any thoughts on this issue?  Thanks in advance 

 

ETA: IgG (DP) was normal. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

"Not as accurate....can be...."

That is not very definitive is it? So, it is not the best test, but like you, it was the only one on the complete celiac panel that I was positve on. So, I needed the endoscopy to rule out celiac disease. Turns out I had a Marsh Stage IIIB (moderate to severe damage). Yep, celiac disease! My only symptom at the time was anemia.

I think you may need to find another GI in order to get an accurate diagnosis. But I would first have a consult with your current GI. You can not believe everything posted on a website! . He may be willing to do the endoscopy again.

Keep eating gluten until all testing is complete. Be sure to get at least six biopsies as the intestinal wall is vast.

Get copies of all your files and lab tests. It is best to always have a copy in your possession.

I wish you the best!

RMJ Mentor

Tests for antibodies to gliadin and to deamidated gliadin peptides are different tests, the latter being newer and more specific.

cdbroberg Newbie

Thank you both for your responses.  I have an appt with my existing gastro next week and a more knowledgable doctor in April.  Since I tested positive for the deamidated peptite gliadin antibodies, should I continue to assume that I am will likely be diagnosed as positive for celiac?  

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Yes, based on my personal experience of having the same exact result. Keep dealing gluten until all testing is complete.

Here is some more information:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

nvsmom Community Regular

That test is about 93-96% specific to celiac disease - out of 100 positive tests, only 4-7 are caused by something else. Chances are you have celiac disease.... It irritates me when doctors dismiss a positive result just because all the tests are not positive - they rarely are. In the presence of celiac disease symptoms, which means you are not a healthy person, mst likely means celiac disease. :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.