Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

A Few Questions About Testing

Gladys Rabbit

Recommended Posts

Gladys Rabbit Newbie
Gladys Rabbit
Posted

Hello, I am brand new here and this is my first post.

 

My story is probably very common.   I am in my sixties and the past year have had a lot of intestinal upsets and a pretty serious case of GERD.   When I was a child,  the home remedy for curing "the runs"  was to eat a lot of white bread and to cut back on fruit and veggies for the duration. I did this and  I got much worse.  Someone gave me a giant scone (since known as "The Scone of Doom") and that night I was quite sick. Between trips to the bathroom,  I did some Google searches on my symptoms and realized I had almost every symptom listed for Celiac,  even some of the odd-ball symptoms.    I quit gluten then and there and  my symptoms went away,  including the GERD.  What a terrific relief!

 

So I'm done with gluten and am adjusting very well to my new diet,  which I actually find myself enjoying.  But of course I don't know that I have Celiac,  I just have a very strong suspicion that I have it.   When I pass up bread and am asked why,  I, of course,  hesitate to say I have Celiac because at this point,  it's just a strong hunch.  So I say "gluten intolerance"  (which is certainly true enough) and I get eye rolls and "oh, every body has that nowadays,"  etc. etc.   Well that's ok,  I have a thick skin and can laugh along with them because before the Scone of Doom I felt the same way (forgive me.)

 

So should I get tested, do you think?  It means going back on gluten products again for six weeks,  I've heard?  I would rather put up with rolling eyes than endure that again.  And I just about faint dead away at the thought of an endoscopy (although I could tell 'em exactly where to take their sample,)

 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Do you have any children? Celiac disease is genetic. So, your diagnosis would help others to get tested even if they are not displaying any intestinal issues (my symptom was anemia).

But if you choose to remain gluten free, you have to be very careful! Check out our Newbie 101 thread under "Coping" for tips that help uncover hidden gluten in processed foods, avoiding shampoos, lotions, lipsticks, etc and cleaning up your kitchen (no shared condiments, toaster, wooden spoons, plastics, etc.

Welcome to the forum!

Gladys Rabbit Newbie
Gladys Rabbit
Posted
  • Author

Thank you, cycling lady.   I have already alerted family members to the potential problem.  I will check out the Newbie 101 page,  thanks.

 

Actually, this wasn't my first post after all, I just realized.

 

Thank you for the welcome.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

You may want to discuss a diagnosis of "possible celiac" or non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) with your doctor just in case you need food accommodations in the future, like for a hospital stay - hospital food is usually not safe for us.  

 

Food accommodations is probably the only reason where you could need a diagnosis.  Some people find a diagnosis helpful in motivating them to stay strictly gluten-free - those with NCGS might not be as careful eating out as one with celiac disease must be.  For example, they may eat fries that were cooked with oil that may have been contaminated, or not sent back the plate of food with the bread on it ( they might just take the bread off instead).

 

If you aren't testing, you'll need to be as strict as a celiac or you may not recover properly.  One exposure (crumb) will set a celiac back by weeks.

 

You may want to consider requesting the genetic tests.  Over 97% of celiacs have the DQ2 or the DQ8 genes.  If you do not have those genes, then it is much more likely that you have NCGS rather than celiac disease.

 

Best wishes in whatever you decide to do.   :)

Gladys Rabbit Newbie
Gladys Rabbit
Posted
  • Author

Thank you for your reply,  NVSmom.

 

Food accommodations is probably the only reason where you could need a diagnosis.

 

 

This is the conclusion I have drawn as well.  I don't feel I have the "right" (so to speak) to say "I can't eat that,  I have celiac"  but I do think I can get away with "My doctor fears (for dramatic effect) that I have celiac."   My doctor will go along with this;  I know him.  He's one of those anti-grain people anyway.

 

I have a lot of mockers in my family.  They think I am onto a new fad.  I'd like to squelch that attitude, if possible.   For them,  "I have a gluten sensitivity"  won't cut the mustard.   

 

I am committed to a totally gluten-free life.  The before and after is just too dramatic to ever go back to gluten.  I am reading this site carefully so I can catch things I would not have noticed.

 

Thank you both for your replies.

 

-Gladys R,

sbell91 Newbie
sbell91
Posted

First visit to the forum today, after discovering my son has tested positive for Celiac yesterday (waiting on referral for biopsy to confirm). My dilemma is similar - I started cutting back on gluten over two years ago and discovered my headaches were virtually eliminated and stomach cramping I had been getting every few weeks for over 20 years disappeared. I saw no reason to get tested for celiac, because I knew I'd have to go back on a full-gluten diet, and if reducing my exposure made me feel better then why bother? My son's positive diagnosis got me researching, and I've learned some new things - that even though my body seems to tolerate small amounts of gluten (a cookie here, the last couple bites of my kids hotdog there), if I do have celiac then I'm doing serious harm to body without realizing it. So, given the genetic component to celiac disease, I've decided to talk to my doctor about getting tested, because I want to know if I should be cutting gluten out entirely and getting really strict with my diet (the increased risk of cancer scares me!). So maybe this would be a reason for you to get tested and find out for sure as well?

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Ah, the mockers.... They usually shut up about it after they see you staying committed, and as your health improves.  Hang in there.  :)

 

Welcome to the board, sbell91.  :)

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


kiwinomad Newbie
kiwinomad
Posted

"So should I get tested, do you think?  It means going back on gluten products again for six weeks,  I've heard?"

 

Hello all, can anyone comment on the above? I'm facing a similar decision and would like to know exactly how long I need to suffer to guarantee an accurate result?

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Welcome, Kiwi!

Here is a link from the University of Chicago:

Open Original Shared Link

Some celiac experts require 1 to 2 slices of bread or the equivalent but most agree to a 12 week challenge for celiac blood test.

kiwinomad Newbie
kiwinomad
Posted

Thank you Cycling Lady!! Very helpful albeit a little daunting!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Rogol72
      - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin. In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted...
    4. JoJo0611
      - JoJo0611 replied to JoJo0611's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      CT with contrast.

      Thank you.
    5. deanna1ynne
      - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased int...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Rogol72 · Posted

      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
      CT with contrast.

      By JoJo0611 · Posted

      Thank you. 
    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.