Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Possible Dh


AliPringle

Recommended Posts

AliPringle Newbie

Hi everyone this will probably be a ramble but I'm honestly fed up.

A bit of background -

At 13/14 diagnosed with raynauds

At 15/16 horrible itch rash developed in both palms.

I am now 30 and struggling with numerous niggly complaints that alone I probably wouldn't even think about but put together they are adding up.

The only symptoms present now that have been there through out are the raynauds and the rash.

The rash is incredibly itchy , starts as red bumps, them little blisters which are quickly scraped off. At its worst I had to bandage my hands through the day and wear gloves to bed as I had scraped them so raw. Steroid creams had limited success with controlling this and symptoms would come and go. I seen a dermatologist in my teens but recieved no diagnosis or further treatment.

In mid 20s I decided to loose weight and list 5 stone. Throughout this period the rash improved but never disappeared. This remains the case now. In the past 2 weeks I have had 2 flares although they are nowhere near as severe as they used to be.

However for the past 18 months I have just been feeling really awful. The main issue is major fatigue i will sleep 9 hrs of an evening and still fall asleep through the day if the opportunity presents. Along with this I also have the following issues

Hair falling out

Bloating, bubbling and wind

Minor constipation

Extremely dry eyes (to the point I can no longer wear lenses)

Night Vision problems

Aches and pains (muscular and joints)

Irritation/moodswings

Raynauds

General sensitivity to cold

Now twice in the past 6 weeks I've had bloods done and had a no to coeliac. Also had a coeliac test done maybe 5 years ago which said the same.

My dad suffers from vitiligo and scleroderma and my dad's aunt from coeliac.

I spoke to my Dr after last bloods and she's baffled and is currently going back through records to the raynauds diagnosis to see if it sheds light and I'm back to see what she thinks on Tuesday.

My gut instinct is to diagnose the hand issues, shall I push for biopsies ?

Sorry for the ramble

Ali


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

But did you have the complete celiac panel? Here it is:

-tTG IgA and tTG IgG

-DGP IgA and DGP IgG

-EMA IgA

-total serum IgA and IgG (control test)

-AGA IGA and AGA IgG - older and less reliable tests largely replace by the DGP tests

-endoscopic biopsy - make sure at least 6 samples are taken

(Source: NVSMOM -- )

If my celiac disease savvy doc had not ordered the complete panel, I would have been in diagnostic limbo land. I had only one positive on the DGP which is usually not included in the celiac disease initial screen test. Having another autoimmune disorder may have messed with your results. I would ge copies of your lab results.

Welcome to the forum and let us know how it goes!

squirmingitch Veteran

Ask for a dh biopsy. Tell them if nothing else you want to rule out celiac disease. Inform your doc that 60% of celiacs who have dh test negative on the celiac blood panel. The dh biopsy must be taken on clear skin adjacent to an active lesion.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Ah! Forgot that in this thread. Thanks, Squirmingitch!

AliPringle Newbie

Thanks guys, I'll quiz on what's been done already, and push for more if necessary! It's getting ridiculous, gone on far to long. Unfortunately this does not seem unusual!

Ali

squirmingitch Veteran

Ah! Forgot that in this thread. Thanks, Squirmingitch!

No, it's good to have both the bloods & the dh biopsy done. You never know when 1 will turn up positive. It is important to see if she got the FULL celiac panel done. We know how docs like to skip some of the tests in it. 

AliPringle Newbie

It's all rather a minefield, I don't know why they just don't run full panels on stuff, it doesn't seem to be just coeliac this isn't done for. I'm just gonna have so sit there and not move till they move further with this. But now the stupid rash has gone again!

Ali


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

If it's dh rash it can come & go as it pleases. 

AliPringle Newbie

Yes it does, very inconvenient :) , this has been the case for the past 15 years now.

Ali

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I am looking at that adorable little person in your photo which brings me to my question. Did your increase in symptoms that you mentioned happen after you gave birth? Celiac disease will often come on or symptoms can worsen after you have a stressor like pregnacy and delivery. 

There can be a fairly high rate of false negatives with celiac testing.  This, as was mentioned, happens for folks with DH fairly commonly unfortunately. When you are done with all celiac related testing it might be a good idea to do the diet strictly for a few months and see if your symptoms resolve.  Sometimes the body can give us answers that testing doesn't.

Hope you get some relief soon.

AliPringle Newbie

Hi

Yes things have kicked of since having my daughter who is now 3.

The rash and raynauds have always been there and minor (very minor) concerns of the stomach for maybe 5 years. But everything else has massively reared its head in the past 2 years.

18 months ago went to drs was told all was ok, changed my pill and accepted their view. 2 months ago went back as was feeling terrible and I'm pushing now until I get somewhere!

Thanks

Ali

AliPringle Newbie

Ps I've not gone strictly gluten but when I clean my act up I do feel much better.

This is something I've considered and if things go nowhere I may have to do off my own back!

Ali

squirmingitch Veteran

You have to keep eating gluten for testing & that includes dh testing.

 

Thing is, if you get a dx it will be much easier to get your daughter tested on a regular basis as she should be.

AliPringle Newbie

Hi I know it's important to keep gluten in the diet for diagnosis, which is why I'm continuing to eat it, luckily I don't have really severe reaxtion. Here in the UK if I get diagnosis I'll be able to get essestials on prescription and as you say for DD in the future it may be beneficial

Dr has looked through the notes and the diagnosis ( in 2005!) on Record was dermatitis?? Excema?? And no further treatment needed currently that was when I was 19.

The Dr says she's stumped and although they're running bloods again (again vague as to what exactly) my file is being taken to some sort of meeting/panel for complicated (ie I've not got a clue) patients.

I showed her photos of my 3 recent breakouts but I'm being referred to a rheumatologist not a dermatologist ? God knows where it goes from here :(

Ali

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.