Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Challenge -Is 3 Weeks Enough?


Reffinej

Recommended Posts

Reffinej Newbie

As of Friday I am officially doing a gluten challenge. Doc said 2 slices of bread, or equivalent, daily for 3 weeks then do the blood test.
I don't want to get a false negative, if I do have celiac disease, but don't want to have gluten in my diet longer than necessary. Conflicting info out there!

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

If you have been eating a normal diet up until now, then you probably do not even need to do that.  Most people eat the equivalent of 1-2 slices of bread (in the form of noodles, muffins, crackers, gravy, breaded meats, baked desserts) per day.

 

If you have been gluten-free, it is better to eat gluten for 8-12 weeks, with 12 weeks being better.  Some tests, like the tTG IgA, tTG IgG, and EMA IgA will be slower to increase, and to decrease.  After going gluten-free, it can take some celiacs a good year for their tTG tests to get back to normal.  The DGP tests (deaminated gliadin peptides) will change a bit faster, but possibly not within 3 weeks... probably not.

 

If you were having the endoscopic biopsy done, 3 weeks would be about right.

 

Good luck!

Reffinej Newbie

Ok,thanks. So I've been as gluten free as I thought I needed to be for health (thyroid antibodies) for 18 months, but without being strict about cross contamination. I had bloods done a few months back and had a high DGP-IgA result hence this journey. 
 

nvsmom Community Regular

You are most likely a celiac then.  The DGP IgA is pretty specific to celiac disease; around 95% of people with a positive test have celiac disease.  The fact that you were eating gluten-light and made a positive result - that's pretty meaningful.   :(

 

I would try to drag your gluten challenge out to at LEAST 6 weeks if possible.  If you make it too short you run the risk of getting false negative results, and then the doctors might discount that positive test (a mistake 99% of the time).

 

This report has some good info on the tests: Open Original Shared Link

 

Enjoy a guiness and a donut for me... not together though.  ;)

cyclinglady Grand Master

I agree that you need to be consuming gluten longer to get accurate test results since you have been gluten free.   Four weeks is enough for just the endoscopy.  8 to 12 weeks for another blood panel (University of Chicago celiac website).  

 

My GI doc ran the complete panel.  I tested positive on just the DPG-iga test.  The others were negative.  Yet, my intestinal biopsies showed moderate to severe damage (Marsh Stage IIIB).  My result was weird per my doctors.  But I am glad the entire panel was ran!  

 

Seems like you have celiac disease!  Plus, you have Hashi's like me!  

 

Welcome to the club!  

Reffinej Newbie

Haha. not sure it's a club I want to be in! Oh well. 
I thought the DGP-IgA was pretty specific, my GP thought not (I like him so was disappointed we didn't seem to agree)....anyway, I guess I can just eat it for longer and do the test when I'm ready. But I am already feeling a bit dodgy from all the gluten. Although, I have to admit that I've enjoyed a couple of croissants- they're pretty much the one thing I miss. (Well, marmite on real bread is nice too)

 

RMJ Mentor

Figure 2 in this paper shows the time course for antibody level increases during a gluten challenge. They didn't test at 3 weeks, but the values went up nicely sometime between 3 and 4 weeks. This was a small study, only about 20 patients, but this is a paper that people refer to for determining the length of a gluten challenge.

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

After my DPG-iga came back positive, I knew in my heart that I had celiac disease.  I had seven weeks in between my blood test results and endoscopy (work contraints), so I loaded up on even more gluten (I was eating gluten prior to my blood tests).  I ate a loaf of sourdough a day, I kid you not!  Plus, I ate every cookie, cupcake, dessert, I could get.  Not the whole package (I shared), but enough to get that last taste!  

 

By the time my endoscopy came, I developed intestinal symptoms.  I do not recommend over eating gluten on a challenge!  Well.....maybe!

Reffinej Newbie

Yeah, I'm not feeling great already. I did indulge a wee bit over the weekend (we were away from home, too) but quickly learnt that a) gluten challenge does not equate to an eat-all-rubbish-you-usually-avoid challenge, and gluten, I think, really doesn't agree with me...and I'm starting to look back at much of the sickness I experienced in years gone by and wonder  if gluten played a bigger part that I realised.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.