Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Low Cholesterol Improvement?


powerofpositivethinking

Recommended Posts

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

I put this in my diagnosis thread, but I wanted to start one specifically on low cholesterol.  Went gluten-free in March 2013 and just got my cholesterol screen back, and my numbers are the lowest they've ever been.  I'm thinking my fat malabsorption problems may have returned.  I eat a high fat diet, so there's no reason these numbers should be so low.  I know having cholesterol and triglycerides are a good thing, so what are your thoughts...is my cholesterol going to stay low?  If yours improved about how long did it take, and how many points did it improve?  

All the articles I've found are about lowering one's cholesterol and very limited information is out there in regards to low cholesterol, and its long term effects.  I'd like it up around 170 again.  Thanks for your input :)

 

Fasting October 2010:         Total 171     HDL 52     LDL 96                          Tri 116

Non-Fasting April 2012:       Total 153     HDL 60     LDL NA                         Tri NA

Fasting April 2013:               Total 135      HDL 52     LDL Did not register   Tri Less than 45

Fasting July 2013:                 Total 155     HDL 63     LDL 82                           Tri 49     VLDL 10

Fasting April 2014:               Total 145     HDL 57     LDL Did not register     Tri Less than 45

Fasting April 2015:               Total 159     HDL 55     LDL Did not register     Tri Less than 45

Fasting November 2015:     Total 140     HDL 51     LDL 79                            Tri 46

Fasting November 2016:     Total 127     HDL 51     LDL 68                             Tri 40    VLDL 8

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I am happy to seem a posting from you, but not happy that you might be having issues.  I am not an expert in cholesterol and can only go by my personal experience.  A very low cholesterol in my research is just as bad as having a high one in terms of risk for cardio.    My numbers (for decades) were very low (off the top of my head the total was 116 and HDL a 32).  Doctors were always happy.  I am on a LCHF diet now (3 years) and my total is 170, HDL 62 and tri 48 and LDL 120 (around there).  My PCP was not happy with the higher LDL, but that was not broken down not density particles, so I am not worried.  Lowered Tri levels have been affected by my reducing sugar and the rest by increasing fats (I have diabetes).  

It is your lowered LDL number that is concerning.  That seems to be related to fat absorption.  You stated that you eat plenty of fats. What were these tests given a few years ago that diagnosed you with malabsorption of fats or pancreatic issues?   Can those be repeated?  Any testing to see if gluten has been somehow sneaking into your diet?  

 

Gemini Experienced

My cholesterol was always in the toilet, pre-diagnosis.  My total was 125 and my HDL was in the low twenties.  The LDL was super low also. Doctors thought that was so great but the dopes didn't realize that having your cholesterol that low was a warning sign.  It should not be that low.

It slowly crept up over the next 7-8 years until it reached around 160-170 for total. So, I figured that I was healing. Then I had it done in the Spring of 2015 and it was 200 for total cholesterol, Tri levels were healthy low around 50 and my LDL had jumped to 110.  However, I was pleased as punch that my HDL was 82! 

The AMA have reduced the LDL normal to <100, when before it was <130.  Do I worry about an LDL of 110?  Not with an HDL of 82 and rising.  The reason my total made the jump to 200 was because of the HDL.

So, I would say that if your numbers are tanking again, you should look into malabsorption testing.  Your other numbers are not bad but your total is too low.

Glad to see you back!  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nony
    Newest Member
    Nony
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.