Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Anybody Out There Who Tested Negative For Celiac


danikali

Recommended Posts

danikali Enthusiast

I was just wondering if anyone out there has ever tested negative for Celiac Disease and then years later, tested for it again and got positive results.....

I mean, could someone be in such early stages of this disease that it is impossible to detect anything more than a sensitivity and then eventually, it turns into full blow Celiac Disease?

Also, I tested positive for the fecal Antigliadin IgA, so how serious is this? Does this mean I can eat it every once in a while, a small amount, or should I avoid it like the plague as if I have Celiac Disease?

I'm starting to think I shouldn't deprive myself completely unless I have a real autoimmune problem with it. :unsure:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aikiducky Apprentice

I posted a couple days ago about a woman on another board who had had three rounds of testing, only the last one showed positive. I don't remember how much time had gone between the first round of testing and the last, but I think it was a few years.

When you think about it logically, of course it's possible to start showing symptoms first before there is detectable damage. The damage gets worse over time, so it has to start somewhere, right?

Personally I would either go completely gluten-free, and only change that if I still had all the symptoms in a years time or so, OR keep eating good doses of gluten, so that hopefully there could be a chance for a clear test result later.

Keep in mind that a lot of people get worse before they get better on the diet. It's not wise to try to evaluate the effects too soon.

Pauliina

floridanative Community Regular

My first GI told me that you could have some symptoms of celiac disease (or gluten intolerance) and if in early stages it may or may not show up in the first biopsy. He also left untreated eventually the biopsy would show damaged villi.

danikali Enthusiast

Thanks. I know, I have to keep that in mind. I guess I really should give it a while. It's only been 2 weeks!

VydorScope Proficient

Absolutly! If you know have a postive test result you need go gluten-free, you have celiac disease.

The only reason to NOT go gluten-free is if you want to do enough damage to actually show up in the tests.

nettiebeads Apprentice

We now know that there are way more false negatives with these tests than are positive. My dr said that the tests still aren't sensitive enough to thoroughly test for celiac. But since you had a positive, you know what you have to do. And believe me, after awhile the gluten-free diet will become second nature. And you will SO enjoy being healthy that it will be very easy to avoid gluten items. It will become ingrained Gluten=bad,

gluten-free=GOOD!

:) Annette

lopo7883 Rookie

In regard to blood test results, are there any precursors to testing positive? Like would a certain antibody be raised but not necessarily over the top limit of the reference range?

If you have a tendency to have bouts of stomach problems for a while to be followed by periods of time with no real issues, could that also affect the results of a blood test?

If so - can you get genetic testing to help see if you have celiac- and where do you get this testing from if it is helpful?

Thanks! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



VydorScope Proficient
In regard to blood test results, are there any precursors to testing positive? Like would a certain antibody be raised but not necessarily over the top limit of the reference range?

Yes, (at least?) two things will impact the blood test.

1) If your IgA decificent (like me), and your doc ONLY does the IgA test, which is calimed to be 99% accurate, then you will show NOT celiac disease, reguardless of anything else. The only way to beat this is to have all of the celiac disease blood tests done. Theres 5 total, but even if you got 4 of them you ebe better off...

2) You have not been eating SUFFENICENT quanties of gluten for sufficent period of time to trigger enoungh damage/antibodies to detect. How much is enought? Short answer 2-3 slices a bread every day for 2-3 months, long answer : https://www.celiac.com/st_main.html?p_catid=2

lopo7883 Rookie
Yes, (at least?) two things will impact the blood test.

1) If your IgA decificent (like me), and your doc ONLY does the IgA test, which is calimed to be 99% accurate, then you will show NOT celiac disease, reguardless of anything else. The only way to beat this is to have all of the celiac disease blood tests done. Theres 5 total, but even if you got 4 of them you ebe better off...

2) You have not been eating SUFFENICENT quanties of gluten for sufficent period of time to trigger enoungh damage/antibodies to detect. How much is enought? Short answer 2-3 slices a bread every day for 2-3 months, long answer : https://www.celiac.com/st_main.html?p_catid=2

Hi-

I dont think I'm IgA deficient. I just had a blood test done by my doctor and the results were negative. My IgA was an 8 (ref range <11= negative). My Serum IgA was 162 (ref range 81-463). My serum IgA seems low, but I dont know if that would impact a test at all. My doctor advised me to go on a gluten free diet becuase she thought the IgA antibodies were too high at 8, even though they weren't over 11. I dont know if that would be impacted by a serum IgA in the low range of the scale.

I was just wondering if maybe that was indicating that it might be in the works for the future... I already have hashi thyroid disease so maybe my doctor figures that its there regardless of the results cause i have some other symptoms? the only test i didn't get was ema because quest labs didn't feel it was necessary.

when i took the test i was eating gluten, i wasn't really monitoring it to make sure i ate a ton, but i hadn't been gluten free really, just more low carbs... the day of the test all i had was an oatmeal granola bar and sushi though ? would that affect it? probably not i dont think...

VydorScope Proficient
when i took the test i was eating gluten, i wasn't really monitoring it to make sure i ate a ton, but i hadn't been gluten free really, just more low carbs... the day of the test all i had was an oatmeal granola bar and sushi though ? would that affect it? probably not i dont think...

1 day either way wont make a difference. "Low carb" is normally low wheat/flour and that WILL impact it.

Claire Collaborator

I have to bite my tongue here. I could really make somebody really mad!

Gluten does nasty nasty damage to the body.

Certainly you can test by eating it continually until real damage can be 'proven'. By then you have a problem or maybe many problems - instead of what you have now. If you push your luck you will most certianly develop other autoimmune diseases. Your intestinal lining will be a mess. Or perhaps your brain will be damaged and you will have to deal with the neurlogical results of that.

How could there possibly be any choice here?

Sorry, I am opinionated. Claire

nettiebeads Apprentice
I have to bite my tongue here. I could really make somebody really mad!

Gluten does nasty nasty damage to the body.

Certainly you can test by eating it continually until real damage can be 'proven'. By then you have a problem or maybe many problems - instead of what you have now. If you push your luck you will most certianly develop other autoimmune diseases. Your intestinal lining will be a mess. Or perhaps your brain will be damaged and you will have to deal with the neurlogical results of that.

How could there possibly be any choice here?

Sorry, I am opinionated. Claire

Nope, not opinionated, just bluntly factual. Even though I was dx'd with celiac disease 9 years ago, I didn't want to do w/o my cereal and light drinks. I ignored the word malt for years thinking I was okay - I didn't have the overt symptoms of being glutened. But after nine years of this, I finally joined the forum and realized what I was doing to myself. I had been experiencing numbness to my face and legs (felt like I was walking on stumps most mornings) and had attributed to aging or something else. This forum made me realize the link between neurapathy and gluten. I confessed what I had been doing to my dr, he believes it'll take 12 to 18 months of being REALLY gluten-free this time to undo the damage. But my legs are getting better. DO THE gluten-free diet if your dr recommended it. It's only your health for the rest of your life.

Annette

lopo7883 Rookie
I have to bite my tongue here. I could really make somebody really mad!

Gluten does nasty nasty damage to the body.

Certainly you can test by eating it continually until real damage can be 'proven'. By then you have a problem or maybe many problems - instead of what you have now. If you push your luck you will most certianly develop other autoimmune diseases. Your intestinal lining will be a mess. Or perhaps your brain will be damaged and you will have to deal with the neurlogical results of that.

How could there possibly be any choice here?

Sorry, I am opinionated. Claire

Hi, I am actually following a gluten free diet right now. My doctor said she thought if it helped with any/all stomach problems I may have then why not give it a shot. My blood tests though are overwhelmingly negative. I posted them in a previous post but I think I may have given the only two that I thought might be slightly abnormal above in the post... but I could be wrong. I already have an autoimmune disease- hashis, but that runs in my family and no one else in my fam has been diagnosed with celiac- not to say that it isn't possible, but still i'm the pioneer.

So, I see what you mean in your post, and because of the interest of my doctor I am trying out a gluten free lifestyle, so that I am not opposed to. Perhaps I should rephrase the question that I originally posted, which was, my tests levels right now though normal, are they really normal? What should antigliadin IgA antibodies really be? and what is the ideal level for IgA serum? I am very active in regard to my thyroid health, and know that although quest- or any lab really- has ranges of oh say .05-5.5, but ideally most people will want to be between a 1-2 or even lower.

So I'm just new to this and still very confused. And I dont want to assume I have celiac disease if I really dont have it... not because I really want bread beer and cake made with pure gluten, but more because I dont want to claim to have an issue that is really just not there.

Although, I will say one thing. I certainly eat sooooooo much healthier on a gluten free diet. :D

Thanks for your advice!

Susan123 Rookie

I have always had a positive IgA level and a negative Tissue Transglutiminase. I had a biopsy- no damage and had another biopsy almost two years later after eating gluten the whole time and still no damage. Who knows right? I am now gluten-free even thought I never had symptoms. I also have a wheat allergy diagnosed through the skin test which puts a wrench in things!

eeyor-fan Contributor
I was just wondering if anyone out there has ever tested negative for Celiac Disease and then years later, tested for it again and got positive results.....

I mean, could someone be in such early stages of this disease that it is impossible to detect anything more than a sensitivity and then eventually, it turns into full blow Celiac Disease?

Also, I tested positive for the fecal Antigliadin IgA, so how serious is this? Does this mean I can eat it every once in a while, a small amount, or should I avoid it like the plague as if I have Celiac Disease?

I'm starting to think I shouldn't deprive myself completely unless I have a real autoimmune problem with it. :unsure:

I tested negative on my biopsi even though before and since my blood tests keep comping back very stong positive.

Hugs

Bridget

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.