Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Low IgA, dr won’t test IgG


Runningyogi

Recommended Posts

Runningyogi Rookie

Just wondering how common this is. I had tTg-IgA and gliandin IgA tested and they both came back at 2, which is without a doubt a “negative result.” However my IgA was 48, the lab cited 79-335 as “normal” and flagged me as low. My PCP said the test shows no celiac, I had already googled and discovered the low IgA situation so I asked her about testing IgG and she said it wasn’t necessary. 

 

Is my IgA just not low enough? I obviously make the antibody just not at a normal level. 

Has anyone else been told this, if so did you push for further testing or get a second opinion? I’m mostly trying to just rule some things out, my son has EoE so it’s not totally unlikely im suffering from something more than IBS. Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master
(edited)
5 minutes ago, Runningyogi said:

Just wondering how common this is. I had tTg-IgA and gliandin IgA tested and they both came back at 2, which is without a doubt a “negative result.” However my IgA was 48, the lab cited 79-335 as “normal” and flagged me as low. My PCP said the test shows no celiac, I had already googled and discovered the low IgA situation so I asked her about testing IgG and she said it wasn’t necessary. 

 

Is my IgA just not low enough? I obviously make the antibody just not at a normal level. 

Has anyone else been told this, if so did you push for further testing or get a second opinion? I’m mostly trying to just rule some things out, my son has EoE so it’s not totally unlikely im suffering from something more than IBS. Thanks!

Your total IGA is not too low for Celiac testing.  The test range isn't specific to Celiac.

"Any level of IgA above 20 mg/dl should make the tTG-IgA test valid, regardless of age."

Open Original Shared Link

 

Edited by kareng
cyclinglady Grand Master
(edited)

Your Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is low or below range, but it is enough to determine if the celiac tests work.  It would have to be close to zero.    So, two negatives is probably correct.  However, some celiacs are seronegative.  Some, like me, do not test positive to all the celiac tests (DGP, TTG and EMA).  (I test positive to only the DGP).  Some people at the time of testing might gluten free or gluten light.  In those cases, an endoscopy may be ordered.  

Do you have any deficiencies like low iron or B-12?  That can also help determine a celiac diagnosis.  Or do you already have another autoimmune disorder, like Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis or autoimmune diabetes?  

I am sorry to hear about your son suffering;g from EOE.  

Edited by cyclinglady
Runningyogi Rookie
41 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

Your Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is low or below range, but it is enough to determine if the celiac tests work.  It would have to be close to zero.    So, two negatives is probably correct.  However, some celiacs are seronegative.  Some, like me, do not test positive to all the celiac tests (DGP, TTG and EMA).  (I test positive to only the DGP).  Some people at the time of testing might gluten free or gluten light.  In those cases, an endoscopy may be ordered.  

Do you have any deficiencies like low iron or B-12?  That can also help determine a celiac diagnosis.  Or do you already have another autoimmune disorder, like Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis or autoimmune diabetes?  

I am sorry to hear about your son suffering;g from EOE.  

I suffered from low iron for a few years but then had an IUD placed and my iron levels have been normal since.  No other autoimmune that I know of. Just a long history of IBS. 

Thanks for your help! 

GFinDC Veteran

I think they say that around 5% of people with celiac disease also have low IgA production.  I'd try another doctor for the complete celiac panel.  There are other antibodies they can test and you might show up positive on one of them.  Maybe search for local celiac support group and ask them for a doctor recommendation.

Runningyogi Rookie
12 hours ago, GFinDC said:

I think they say that around 5% of people with celiac disease also have low IgA production.  I'd try another doctor for the complete celiac panel.  There are other antibodies they can test and you might show up positive on one of them.  Maybe search for local celiac support group and ask them for a doctor recommendation.

 

Thank you! I am seeing lots of conflicting info on low IgA and how it affects the testing. It’s also difficult because when I search most results are for IgA deficiency and not low IgA (deficiency is the close to zero result from what I understand)

i did find a couple of sites that mentioned low IgA specifically and did say to check the IgG, but at this point I feel like a hypochondriac chasing a diagnosis. 

Anyway, thanks for your help everyone. I have a GI appointment next month so I just need to decide if I should trial myself off gluten before hand or wait on the off chance he wants to run another test. I’m just kind of sick of being sick and I’ve felt better off gluten in the past. (I was off gluten due to nursing my wheat, barley and rye allergic son for almost two years)

ravenwoodglass Mentor
1 hour ago, Runningyogi said:

 

Anyway, thanks for your help everyone. I have a GI appointment next month so I just need to decide if I should trial myself off gluten before hand or wait on the off chance he wants to run another test. I’m just kind of sick of being sick and I’ve felt better off gluten in the past. (I was off gluten due to nursing my wheat, barley and rye allergic son for almost two years)

Please wait to go gluten free as if you go gluten free now the doctor won't be able to test you for celiac.  If your son is 'allergic' to wheat, rye and barley it sounds like he may be celiac. Your being diagnosed could help him as well as yourself.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Runningyogi Rookie
55 minutes ago, ravenwoodglass said:

Please wait to go gluten free as if you go gluten free now the doctor won't be able to test you for celiac.  If your son is 'allergic' to wheat, rye and barley it sounds like he may be celiac. Your being diagnosed could help him as well as yourself.

He actually outgrew the wheat allergy! Hooray!  He has traditional, IgE mediated, food allergies. He's still allergic to barley and rye.

I think it's probably best to leave the gluten in just in case, even though it really looks like celiac is not what I have. 

erika1petrus Newbie

Hello ? I have low IgA. My doctor said that IgA is the immune protein that keeps one from getting sinus infections & breaks down gluten & dairy in the gut. With low IgA, a celiac test will come back with a “false positive”. I was told to treat myself as if I have celiac disease & that the consequences of eating gluten are the same. I am never supposed to eat gluten or dairy. Hope this helps!

tessa25 Rising Star
21 minutes ago, erika1petrus said:

With low IgA, a celiac test will come back with a “false positive”

Low IGA can cause TTG IGA and DGP IGA celiac tests to show a false negative.

Welcome to the forum!

Runningyogi Rookie
4 hours ago, tessa25 said:

Low IGA can cause TTG IGA and DGP IGA celiac tests to show a false negative.

Welcome to the forum!

Thanks! It’s interesting because the link someone shared above says as long as the IgA is over 20 the test is accurate but I’ve read annecdotal stuff suggesting otherwise. 

cyclinglady Grand Master
39 minutes ago, Runningyogi said:

Thanks! It’s interesting because the link someone shared above says as long as the IgA is over 20 the test is accurate but I’ve read annecdotal stuff suggesting otherwise. 

That link is pretty spot on.  The University of Chicago is a leading celiac research center.  We are discussing testing for celiac disease (used as a control test) and not issues with a low Immunoglobulin A and the health issues that arise from that. 

Some celiacs are seronegative period (rare).   If you think your IgA results are incorrect, then ask for the IgG test versions.   If you  and your GI strongly suspect celiac disease, your GI should order an endoscopy.  

You should remain on gluten until all testing for celiac disease is complete.  Since your GI appointment is just a month away, I would advise sticking to a full gluten diet.  Some research centers advise 2 to 4 weeks prior to an endoscopy.  We have seen too many members who just did 2 weeks and then received a negative biopsy result.  Was it because their bodies were slow to generate antibodies and two weeks was just not long enough?  Who knows?  Now they are in diagnostic limboland.  Use the more conservative number, would be my non-medical advice.  

Keep in mind, that sometimes we jump to conclusions with out all the facts.  I could have sworn my niece had celiac disease.  Turns out it was Crohn’s.  I could have sworn I had active celiac disease with my symptoms and an elevated celiac antibodies.  My recent repeat endoscopy revealed healthy villi.    My  current issues were with a new diagnosis — Chronic Autoimmune Gastritis. 

Runningyogi Rookie

Yeah sorry wasn’t trying to insinuate that the link was wrong. Also, i don’t have any strong feelings that I have celiac. I don’t know WHAT I have unfortunately! I was just trying to rule it out and then I had the low IgA which led to me to researching that and I was curious if that was indicative of something yadda yadda...I fell down an Internet rabbit hole. Lol

  • 3 months later...
pupppy Apprentice

You have iga deficiency... it's called partial iga deficiency. Anything under the range is iga deficient and can invalidate the iga test. According to mayoclinic's algorithm they are supposed to run the igg tests so you are right. I don't know what that other link is saying, but I think you are right

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

pupppy Apprentice

 

On 4/12/2018 at 3:45 PM, cyclinglady said:

Your Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is low or below range, but it is enough to determine if the celiac tests work.  It would have to be close to zero.    So, two negatives is probably correct.  However, some celiacs are seronegative.  Some, like me, do not test positive to all the celiac tests (DGP, TTG and EMA).  (I test positive to only the DGP).  Some people at the time of testing might gluten free or gluten light.  In those cases, an endoscopy may be ordered.  

Do you have any deficiencies like low iron or B-12?  That can also help determine a celiac diagnosis.  Or do you already have another autoimmune disorder, like Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis or autoimmune diabetes?  

I am sorry to hear about your son suffering;g from EOE.  

You're wrong. Partial iga deficiency is still iga deficiency and the doctor is supposed to run igg tests. 

pupppy Apprentice
On 4/12/2018 at 3:42 PM, kareng said:

Your total IGA is not too low for Celiac testing.  The test range isn't specific to Celiac.

"Any level of IgA above 20 mg/dl should make the tTG-IgA test valid, regardless of age."

Open Original Shared Link

 

You and your link are wrong. Algorithms for testing state that if iga is out of range they should test for igg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Blozo
    Newest Member
    Blozo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.